Response in Opposition of HLA to Motion of Appellant-Defendant-Intervenor Wood for Establishment of Expedited Briefing Scheduling
Public Court Documents
January 29, 1990
5 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Response in Opposition of HLA to Motion of Appellant-Defendant-Intervenor Wood for Establishment of Expedited Briefing Scheduling, 1990. 570a9544-247c-f011-b4cc-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/645e8d2a-9418-4048-be12-2f0213168fab/response-in-opposition-of-hla-to-motion-of-appellant-defendant-intervenor-wood-for-establishment-of-expedited-briefing-scheduling. Accessed December 24, 2025.
Copied!
MATTHEWS & BRANSCOMB
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
2OILCONGRESS AVENUE, SUITE 2050
I8O0 FIRST CITY BANK TOWER AUSTIN, TEXAS 7870Il ONE ALAMO CENTER
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78477 TELEPHONE 512-320-5055 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205
512-888-926 TELECOPIER 512-320-5013 512-226-421
GABRIELLE K. MCDONALD
January 29, 1950
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
Gilbert F. Ganucheau, Clerk
U.S. Courtiof Appeals, 5th Circuit
600 Camp Street
New Orleans, Louisiana 70130
RE: League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC),
et al. v. Jim Mattox, et al.; Cause No. 908014;
In the United States Court of Appeals for the
Fifth Circuit
Dear Mr. Ganucheau:
Enclosed please find an original and three (3) copies of the
Response in Opposition of Houston Lawyers' Association, et al. to
Motion of Appellant-Defendant-Intervenor Wood for Establishment
of Expedited Briefing Scheduling in the above-styled and numbered
cause. Please return the copies, file stamped and dated in the
self-addressed, stamped envelope provided.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely yours,
MATTHEWS & BRANSCOMB
A Professional Corporation
hs K. McDonald
5GKMdl :mld
Enclosures
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FIFTH CIRCUIT
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN
AMERICAN CITIZENS (LULAC),
COUNCIL #4434, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
and
HOUSTON LAWYERS ASSOCIATION,
et al.,
NO. 90-8014
Plaintiff-Intervenors,
Ve.
JIM MATTOX, et al.,
State Defendants. D
A
N
N
D
A
L
WD
ND
WN
D
N
N
W
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION OF HOUSTON LAWYERS' ASSOCIATION, et al.
TO MOTION OF APPELLANT-DEFENDANT-INTERVENOR WOOD
FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF EXPEDITED BRIEFING SCHEDULING
TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
NOW COME Houston Lawyers' Association ("HLA), Weldon Berry,
Francis Williams, Alice A. Bonner, William Lawson, Deloyd T. Parker,
Jr., and Bennie McGinty ("Plaintiff-Intervenors-Appellees") and hereby
respectfully submit their response to the Motion of
g Schedule in
the above-styled matter, and respectfully pray that this Court deny
said Motion and as grounds therefore would respectfully show as
follows:
I.
Plaintiff, League of United Latin American Citizens ("LULAC") has
previously filed a response in opposition to the Motion of Appellant
Entz for establishment of expedited briefing schedule.
Plaintiff-Intervenors-Appellees join in that response for the reasons
stated in the response of LULAC.
it.
Defendant-Appellant George S. Bayoud, Jr. has filed a Motion
dated January 24, 1990, joining in Judge _Entz's Motion for
Establishment of Expedited Briefing Schedule. For the reasons
previously set forth in the Response in Cpposition filed by
Plaintiff-Appellee LULAC to Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant Entz's
Motion, Plaintiff-Intervenors-Appellees oppose Bayoud's Motion.
IIX.
Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant Judge Wood has merely joined in
the Motion of Judge Entz and for the reasons previously set forth in
opposition to said Motion, Plaintiff-Intervenors-Appellees HLA,
et al., oppose this Motion.
lv.
The issues that are presented to this Court as the relate to the
Harris County voters, are complex and of such significance that it is
necessary to have the normal briefing schedule in order to properly
prepare.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff-Intervenors-Appellees Houston Lawyers
Association, et al., respectfully request this Court to deny the
Motion for Establishment of Expedited Briefing Schedule filed by
Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant Wood and establish a briefing schedule
that comports with the Court's usual time limitations which will
provide all parties an opportunity to fully brief the complex issues
presented in this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
JULIUS LEVONNE CHAMBERS
SHERRILYN A. IFILL
NAACP Legal Defense and
Educational Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson Street, l6th Floor
New York, New York 10013
(212) 219-1900
OF COUNSEL: Cotihuin ty [hd Lan)
GABRIELLE K. MCDONALD
MATTHEWS & BRANSCOMB 301 Congress Avenue, Ste. 2050
A Professional Corporation Austin, Texas 78701
(512) 320-5055
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF-
INTRVENORS-APPELLEES
HOUSTON LAWYER'S ASSOCIATION,
January 29, 1990 et al.
CERTIFICATE OF CERTIFICATE
I certify that on this. 29th day of January, 1990, I sent a
copy of the foregoing document by first class U.S. mail to each
of the following: William L. Garrett, Garrett, Thompson & Chang,
8300 Douglas, Suite 800, Dallas, Texas 75225; Rolando Rios,
Southwest Voter Registration & Education Project, 201 N. St.
Mary's, Suite 521, San Antonio, Texas 78205; Sherrilyn A. Ifill,
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., 99 Hudson Street,
16th Floor, New York, New York 10013; Renea Hicks P.O. Box 12548,
Capitol Station, Austin, Texas 78711-2548; Edward B. Cloutman,
TIT, Mullinax, Wells, Baab & Cloutman, P.C., 3301 Elm Street,
Dallas, Texas 75226-1637; J. Eugene Clements, Porter & Clements,
700 Louisiana, Suite 3500, Houston, Texas 77002-2730; Robert H.
Mow, Jr., Hughes & Luce, 2800 Momentum Place, 1717 Main Street,
Dallas, Texas 75201; and John L. Hill, Jr. Liddell, Sapp, Livley,
Hill & LaBoon, 3300 Texas Commerce Tower, Houston, Texas 77002.
id
ielle K. McDonald
oe
5GKMdk:mld
United States Court of Appeals
FIFTH CIRCUIT
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TEL SO SOASIE
600 CAMP STREET
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130
1990
GILBERT F. GANUCHEAU
CLERK
January 30,
Mr. Renea Hicks
Special Assistant Attorney General
Post Office Box 12548
Captiol Station
Austin, Texas 78711
No. 90-8014 - League of United Latin American
Citizens, Et Al. v. Judge Entz, Et Al.
Receipt is acknowledged of the Attorney General of Texas’ motion
to certify state law question or, alternatively, to disqualify
counsel. Receipt is also acknowledged of appellant George S.
Bayoud, Jr.’s response to motion to certify state law question,
etc. and the Attorney General’s reply to that response. This is
to advise that the above mentioned motion and responses will be
submitted to the Court.upon completion of the briefing schedule.
Very truly yours,
GILBERT F. GANUCHEAU, Clerk
By E00 & . tin altn
Eileen C. Boudoin
Case Manager
ECB:afg
cc: All counsel of record