Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to James U. Blacksher Re Dillard v. Crenshaw County; Affidavit of Pamela Karlan and Appendices (Karlan CV and Working Hours)
Correspondence
July 11, 1988

Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to James U. Blacksher Re Dillard v. Crenshaw County; Affidavit of Pamela Karlan and Appendices (Karlan CV and Working Hours), 1988. 716cdf30-ec92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/64cbc682-1b17-4f97-a2d5-87a027adac31/correspondence-from-pamela-karlan-to-james-u-blacksher-re-dillard-v-crenshaw-county-affidavit-of-pamela-karlan-and-appendices-karlan-cv-and-working-hours. Accessed October 09, 2025.
Copied!
Les.,EDrensoH" NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. 99 H udson Street, New York, N. Y. 1 001 3 o (21 21 21 S' 1 900 JuIy 11, 1988 James U. Blackser 5th Floor, Title Building 300 21st Street, North Birmingham, Alabama 35203 Re: Dillard v. Crenshaw County (Montqomery and Baldwin County Boards of Education Dear Jim: I have qone back over my time records to see whether I had any time attributable specifically to these two defendants, and to compile a total of time spent on subclass A that cannot be allocated to an individual defendant. Virtually all of my attributable subclass A time concerned motions to dismiss or sunmary judgment motions fired by other A defendants and the indeteminate Baldwin County Commission. f do not have any tine specifically noted concerning the ltlontgomery and Baldwin BOE's. They Lrere in part the subject of several telephone calls from you and Ed; in addition, there have been several opinions concerning them. I have not, however, broken down opinion-reading time by defendant, since they arrive in such large envelopes, and the opinion-reading time has been included in my reguest for fees in the subclass B litigation, since that,s what the vast burk of the opinions concern. r wourd estimate that the total tine spent on each of these defendants is unlikely to exceed one or two hours. My total subclass A tine since the summer of L987 when the classes were split comes to 21.3. r have prepared an affidavit, which accompanies this letter. Lastly, I am enclosing a copy of Peyton and my review of Abby Thernstrom. ft's some fight beach reading. I shall be moving to Charlottesville next week. l{y address there is University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, VA 229OL. My office phone number will be (804) 924-78LO. ere1y, LIa S. Karlan enclosures (2) Corrrribtdions on dedtfribb lor U.S ironw t4, pt rps. Ttr IAACP Lcoal lbhns! & Educedonal Fund, lnc. (LDD b not part ol ttu tlatonel tusodstoo tor thc Adtarrcmcnt ot Colorcd hople (NAACP) al$ough UlFmstounOiOOyttr llMCPrnd rtrarlslbcommitmcnitoqualdCha. LDFhrsh.dlorovcrOytsrs! tlpanh Bo8rd, proCram, statt,olliccand brdget. lega1 ald organlzatlon, and lt has been clted by the United States Suprene Court as having ,a corporate reputation for expertness Ln presenting and arguing the difficult questions of law that frequently arise in civil rights litigation.x NAACp v. Button, 371 U.S. at 422. In the area of voting rights in particuJ.ar, attorneys affiliated with the Legal Defense Fund have litigated important cases decided by the Supreme Court, l the Eleventh Circuitr2 and other Circuits3. 3. Neither I nor any other attorney on the staff of the Legal Defense Fund has accepted or expects to receive any conpensation or reimbursement from the plaintiffs in this case. No counsel fees, costs, oE expenses will be obtained for work done or money spent on this case by the Lega1 Defense Fund or its staff attorneys unless the Court awards such fees, costs, and expenses against the defendants. Any such award to attorneys employed by the Legal Defense Fund during the pendency of this case will be paid over to the Legal Defense Fund. 1 E g-, Thornburcr v. Ginoles, 478 U.S. _, 92 L.Ed.Zd. 23(1986); NAACP v. Hampton County, 47O U.S. 155 (1985); Escambia County v. llcMillan, 466 U.S. 49 (1984); City of Mobile v. Bo1den, 446 U.S. 55 (1980), remanded, 542 F. Supp. 1050 (S.D. AIa. 1982) tUnited Jewish Organizations v. Carey, 430 U.S. L44 (L9771 i East carrorl Parish school Bd. v. Marshall, 424 u.s. 636 (L976); Arlenv. Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 (1966). 2 E-€.-, Dillard v. Crenshaw County, 831 ?.2d, 246 (I1th Cir. 1987) t Brown v. Board of Schoo1 Commissioners, 706 F.2d 1103(l1th Cir. 1e83). .3.8.o., Chisom v. Edwards, - F.2d - (sth Cir. 1998); Coalition for Education in District 1 v. Board of Elections, 495 F.2d 1090 (2d cir. L974)i BelI v. Southwell, Cir.L967l,. Srnith v. Paris, 386 F.2d 979 (sth 376 F.2d 6s9 (sth cir. L9671. 4. I am adnitted to practi.ce law before the followlng courts: The United States Courts of Appeals for the Fifth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits; the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; and the Appellate DivLsion, First Departnent of the State of New york. 5. Attached as Appendix A to this af f idavit is a reEiume which correctly sunmarizes ny biographical data, educational background, enplolment histoEy, and professional experience. 6. Since my graduation from Yale Law School in 1984, f have specialized in civil rights and constitutional litigation. From 1984 to 1985, I was a law clerk to the Honorable Abraham D. sofaer, united states District court, southern District of New York. Fron 1985 to 1986, f was a Iaw clerk to the Honorable Harry A. Blaclstun, Associate Justice of the United States Supreme court. During my crerkships, r was responsible for reviewing many cases involving constitutional law issues and voting rights. From 1986 to 1988, r worked primariry on voting rights cases as a staff attorney at the r,ega1 Defense Fund. During the summer of 1987, I was responsible for managing the Fundrs voting docket and overseeing alr voting cases in which the Fund participated. I am currently an Associate Professor of Law at the University of Virginia School of Law, where I teach Civil Procedure and Law and Po1itical Participation. 7. I have broad experience in the litigation of voting rights cases under the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution. In addition to the case at bar, I have been lead counsel for plalntlffs Ln Chlsom v. EdwardE, 839 F.2d 1056 (5th Clr. 1988); Jones v. Edwards, 674 F. Supp. L225 (E.D.La. 1987) (three-Judge court); and No. H-C-86-47, Whitfield v. Clinton (E.D. Ark.). I have also participated in numerous district court cases including No. 86-1O48-CfV-5, Alexander v. Martin (E.D.N.C.), and No. 84-35- D-O, PUSH v. Allain (N.D. Miss. 1987). I successfully represented a voting rights actlvist in his petition for rehearing on his criminal conviction, United States v. Gordon, _ F.2d _ (l1th Cir. 1988) (per curiam). I had primary responsibility for preparing the anicus briefs filed by the Legal Defense Fund in Ua}Iory v. Eyrich, 839 ?.2d 275 (5th Cir. 1988); No. 87-L75L, Gomez v. City of Watsonville (9th Cir. ) ; and No. 87- 376L, Westwego Citizens for Better Government v. City of Westwego (sth cir. ) . 9. I am the author of rrDiscriminatory Purpose and Mens Rear rr 93 YaIe L.J. L1l (1983) . In addition, I am the co-author with Professor Peyton McCrary of rtWithout Fear and Without Research: Abigail Thernstrom on the Voting Rights Act,r' 4 J.L. & Pol. 75L (1988), a review essay discussing recent scholarly treatment of the Voting Rights Act. I have also participated as a panelist in several conferences and training programs on voting rights scholarship, litigation, and legislation: Southern Educational Foundation, Aug. 9, L997, New Orleans, Louisiana American Political Science Association, Sept. 3, LgB7, Chicago, Illinois Committee on FuII Political Participation, Oct. 22, 1987, San Antonio, Texas 4 v. CRENSHAW COt NTY, ALABAITIA, gl_&_, Defendants. IN THE I'NITED STATES DTSTRICT COURT ::i_:::_=::-_:=::I::_::_:33Y_* JOIIN DILLARD, g.@_, : C.A. No. Plaintiffs, 85-T-1332-N AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK CTTY OF NEW YORK PAITIELA S. KARLAN, being duly slrorn, deposes and says: 1. I am one of the attorneys for the plaintiffs in this case, and I was employed as Assistant Counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (nlegal Defense Fundrr) fron 1986 to 1988. I subnit this affidavit in support of plaintiffs, application for an award of attorneys, fees, costs, and expenses. 2. The L,egal Defense Fund is a nonprofit corporation which rlas founded in 1940 and which has since furnished legal assistance in cases involving claims of racial discrimination and deprivation of constitutional rights before state and federal courts throughout the nation. See NAACP v. Button, 37L U.S. ALS, 421 n. 5 (L953). The Legal Defense Fund has been approved by the Appellate Division of the State of New York to function as a ) ) ) Center for Constitutlonal Rlghts, lttay 21, 1988, t{est Menphis, Arkansas 10. My hourly rate is $ffO.OO per hour. Appendix B to this affidavlt is a schedule of the hours which I spent between the summer of 1987 and the present on litigation against subclass A menbers that cannot be allocated directly to a particular defendant. These hours were conpiled from contemporaneous tine records which I have maintained throughout this period. 11. In addition to the hours listed in Appendix B, other attorneys employed by the Legal Defense Fund have reviewed documents filed in this case and have conferred with ne from time to time concerning this case. These attorneys include Director- Counsel Julius LeVonne Chambers, First Assistant Counsel Charles Stephen Ralston, and Assistant Counsel Elaine R. Jones and C. Lani Guinier. In order to provide a conserrative etatement, of the time spent on this case and to elininate any hours which might conceivably constitute a duplication of effort, the Legal Defense Fund is not requesting fees for the serrrices of these attorneys. Pamela S. Karlan Subscribed to and sworn to before ne this il Lfr'aY of JuIy 1988. 5 APPENDIX A PAI.TEI.A SUSAN l[Irull}I IORX EXPERIENCE 1988 University of Virginia School of Law Charlottesville, Virginia Associate Professor of Law 1985 1988 NAACP r.egar Defense and Educationar Fund, rnc. New York, New York Assistant Counsel 1985 1985 United States Supreme Court Washington, D.C. Law Clerk to Associate Justice Harry A. Blacloun 1984 1985 United States District Court Southern District of New york New York, New York Law Clerk to Judge Abraham D. Sofaer EDUCArION 1980 1984 YaIe Law Schoo1 New Haven, Connecticut Article & Book Review Editor, YaIe Law Journal Director, YaIe Moot Court of Appeals Research Assistant to Professor paul Gewirtz Supenrising Student, Jerone Frank Legal Selrrices Program at F.C.I. Danbury 1981 1984 YaIe University Department of History New Haven, Connecticut J.D. /YI.A. Program Honors in AI1 Graduate School Courses L9'76 1980 YaIe College New Haven, Connecticut B.A. magrna cum laude with distinction in history Robert D. French Scholar DeForest, Townsend, TenEyck, and Buck-Jackson Prizes PUBLICNrIONs Nonmaiority Rules and the Supreme Court, 136 U.Pa.L. Rev. LO67 (1988) (with Richard Revesz) I{ithout Fear and Without Research: Abigail Thernstrom on the Voting Rights Act, 4 J.L. & pol. 75L (1988) (with Peyton McCrary) BAR IDIITTSSIONS Book Revlew, A.B.A. Journal, Feb. 1988, tt 117 (reviewing A. Thernstrom, Whose Votes Count?: Affinrratlve Action and llinority Voting Rights (1e87) ) Book Review, Human Rights, Summer 1988, it _(reviewing S. Cagin & P. Dray, I{e Are Not Afraid: The Story of Goodman, Schwerner, and Chaney and the Civil Rights Campaign for Mississippi (1988) ) Adnitted to Practice in New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit L.J. 111 (1983) APPENDIX Activitv neeting with cocounsel re subclass A defrts status conference and meeting re subclass A def 'ts B Date oe/Lo/87 oe/2e/87 Hours 3.0 2.6 5.2 2.5 1.5 o.2 2.O L.o 1.5 o.1 o.7 LL/L7/87 work on subclass A cost allocation memo LL/L8/88 completed and sent out draft of subclass A cost allocation memo OL/O4/88 adapted LT\I brief for subclass A defendants and serrred OL/29/88 selrrice of LTV reply brief on subclass A 6/22/88 tel conf with JIIB and LTM re subclass A fees issues; work on subclass A fee reimbursements 6/27/88 conv with .rUB re subclass A fees and work on reimbursements O7/O4/88 prepared memo for finance and project head re subclass A expense reimbursements 07/06/88 discussed reimbursenents with I,G O7/LL/88 prepared affidavit and time sheet and sent to Jt,B TOTAL 2L.3