Order to Suspend Judgment

2 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Includes Correspondence from Bailey to Winter.

Impact area
- Criminal Justice
Topic
- Police Accountability
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organization
- LDF
Matter
- Garner v. Memphis Police Department
Case
- Garner v. Memphis Police Department
U.S. state
- Tennessee
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 86189901-27a8-f011-bbd3-000d3a53d084

Cite this item

Case Files, Garner Hardbacks. Order to Suspend Judgment, 1980. 86189901-27a8-f011-bbd3-000d3a53d084. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/66607a3e-fb5b-4bf8-8ee7-e2e184be7b27/order-to-suspend-judgment. Accessed February 12, 2026.

Copied!

    Walter Lee Bailey, Jr .
A T T O R N E Y  A T  LAW

161 JEFFERSON AVENUE SUITE 901 TENOKE BUILDING 
MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE 38103 

A R E A  C O D E  901 521-1560

S H A R IN G  O F F IC E S

D 'A R M Y  B A IL E Y  
W. O T IS  H IG G S ,  JR.

June 5, 1980

The Honorable Steven L. Winter
NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York 10019
Dear Steve:
Enclosed is a copy of the order per request.

Very truly yours, 

Walter Lee Bailey, Jr.
WLB:jit 
Enclosure



FILED

Af r Z3
 ̂ ■ t*.. _ . ; *. t - ■ •. 0 ̂  I

WESTERS UlST. OF TEHN.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE 

WESTERN DIVISION

CLEAMTEE GARNER,etc., 
Plaintiff,

V .

MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, 
et al.,

Defendants.

NO. C-75-1A5

O R D E R

After entry of an Order in this cause, concluding 
after remand that plaintiff, as a matter of law, was not 
entitled to reopen the case by way of a new trial on issues 
already decided, plaintiff's counsel has moved for 
reconsideration. The plaintiff is hereby granted forty-five 
(45) days from the date of this Order to submit further 
briefs and memoranda on the issues asserted to be "open" for 
proof in light of Monell v. Department of Social Services,
436 U.S. 658 (1978). The Court will consider further the 
questions raised, including any offer of proof, after allowing 
defendants twenty (20) days to respond after receipt of 
plaintiff's submission.

It is so ORDERED this ^  day of ,
U

1980. Judgment for defendant will be suspended pending such 
further consideration in light of the contention that plaintiff 
was not given full opportunity to brief and argue the merits.

53

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Order to Suspend Judgment

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organization

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in