Excerpts from the Senate Report (Episodic Barriers)
Working File
January 1, 1982

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Excerpts from the Senate Report (Episodic Barriers), 1982. c96ca17e-dc92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/6809b7e8-1e26-45e7-a26b-448dca71d525/excerpts-from-the-senate-report-episodic-barriers. Accessed October 09, 2025.
Copied!
?f .to-tt t n.r.4p. tfi-fl f. l'{ [p. ti tl z? ( p.zob) gErrait A";"n re*rr-qr*U^W"W Rqe Soth th. Bourc rnd 8.natc bclrlnl rcco?di eootrlnaltfftl6 lol dtnkr .ltuttt,.fo Efiltbortir DrrtlclDrtton. lneludldnt pbyrl(tl vl6l.hl. ,nd lpflmldi. 1i|;; o(ioia; anA-ernOtOrtcr. dtrcilEln.iort mrnlOuhtlotr oFwtiFrr. Rr.drttrtlo!-FE'UIIF Iiatien,i iuilnioiiotrn- cbansint th. locrtlon of pollllna Dlieer lnd lotlrteneG on r* 'iiiiGi'ii-ijnidiiilnirouii ini miirtiitton hotrrr. Eoua. R.m?t No. n?-22?._nD.. I!-4. rnd i;e;H;-;;i;;-iiii sinia-fuliaiii Sutconmttt* oa th. eoritltntlon br Rtrth J. Eln.?- iiii.-priitaini.-L-ail {t( Women vdten. J.nurr t, ,lge2 rt lt lnd Lrtt6 co'hmlttts H*l*i{r*iii$qi.'*111"'i'IlTlt:t'.:;lffii1x['i1'rl'fi1':ff'8ffi df$l!i':,1i"ifi[: iiio -ntroi-.-Ltniifr 2, tet2 at 2-? vllmr u.rtlo.r' b"to?. ttc Eoula Judlclrt, Subg Elttc. on Clrll rDd CoBrtltutlonrl nl8bt!, JuD. 18. 1981, tt l8?8, ft0t ("Eoort bErlDn") (Dolltna phe6,: Iloup Hc.?lDt!. tdtlEony o, RolaEdo Rlo!. Mrt 6, lgEl rt {2 (ItrtlEl: dittoni:-tbc Scaatr. h?irlDar-tatlEoDy ol VllEr llrrtlo€z. JtDui?y 27, let2. at 5-6 (D{rslnr). Clrll Rtibtr CoEElulon Beport. Thc CoEElralon !ct! out nuEriou! atrEpld dl ru-ehlbpcolmcnti to Dlaorlty cudldit.! rDd tb"tr rupnortcrr (Dp. 50-Cl): harltaE.Et rod htlmldrtloo Io r.llrtrrtloD (o"- 22-211: purtlog rDd mr.Blstrrtloa (27-2,,l; DolllDa Dhccr (20-31 ; rnd brr.um.ut and lntlEldatloa lD votlDr (3135). the tio of ihe iLne Erp or cne broadly from i -*.*str;atr'wcrsrEE-iifr nft 'flnrrroff yorets_-r.,oeneeE6EG-','ili ,::H:?Xffi: ffi ploin-tTfrts could.show n varietv of fuctot's' oe- E"[ff;T;;';[f"6{i ";;''i'r"' i'*l'ii'"' "' p"o""dure colled into I quesfrorL ?' 77b (W zo*e] MVWZbnmzr, ond their Proggny dealt rith elfurcl svstem feetuies such as at-lorge elections, mejority vote requirements ahd districtins Dlans. Howevei, Section 2 rcmains the meior strtutory "-tiUiiio" ofail vr*in*+ichts discriminotion. It also prohibits prrc' fil;-;fi ;ii. -*[ii6pi#aiDnd not involvin g permanenc str-uclural barriers. rcsult in |hedciriffof equrl scces to any phasc of the elector- /-t --- - . l- t---:,-^-:.-- -..^ -^-L^-'ol process for minority nroup members.- fi til.t 4!"Eg"q {rEctici, t 1.".*: to s.ugh. a series,of ev^ents glgt: sodes, thtffi-E5uffidient to establish a violati.on Egidic&.rr-r'e*s 3- ?.63 Lyv zzl -, (pzzD --Thobailoutprorisionarsi--requirestlruar jrisuicd6i-undertake posrtyogteps: , I P eliminate intimidation lnd harassment of minoritv votens-,, I :: :IL1ll^gppoguniries f_or minority pa"ti.ipil-ion;.'"nI*'-', ro eriminate voting procedurcs ana rireiroas i[i.tr'inlii'it ",I dilute equal cccess 6'rh;;";;;i;r;;*. Beyond the outricht elimination of discriminatorv bariers. the ao- t..r lnaf,e ure eontinued efiects of mony yeors of discrimination in order to be reliev-ed of special obligrriiohs under the Act. the Supreme Court found it appropriate fgr' Co-rlgryss "to,counte#,he ieroeiuatio!=olg6 p.5..l f-_'..Befoqg a ffin r coverags. it should eliminotsdrerrmudory.vot$s nro-cedures on4 methods-of election which deny €qu8l pccess to tJ'e electoral proces* Thb does not mesn thet, minoritiesnrustlrave been elected in plroportion to cheir nu.u"".. LuC6"i, ilit *f"$;""ruff*unity io pericipate on * A;Jili"*;ilf, ;;- rn. determining whether proeedurce or methods qnhibit or dilute equar. rccet8 -to_ths electoral proeesg" thc strnderd to bc used is the trsults test of w llitc. rn other words, che tpst would be the same as thatfor a chcllenge brought under Seciib" z Li ttre votinc Rishd AJ:-;. 3mencl91l by. thc committee bill, except that the burden"of Sroor -oiiaDo on. the lunsdtction eeking to boil out. As discussed under the amondment to section 2 of the Act, the whitc stendsrd is one with f.! _:\ tl".,yy*t l1e fg gdlb&snt i"triA nas ueei- .t. "ni.a{i;*toeqgrderable [trgation.r yeErs_of pervrsile loting discriminotionJ City ol Rame v. Eliminate and lfa iolenee prone 'igilante or para-miritary'-organizations. hate groups and other meanso.f phvsieal intimidationl,* It is ;;;"i"r;l"r rcha.+ ^r --_. :.-_:_r:-;lJl';'H'"i*xl*:::"1:'^l:.':il6ii.di"fi::;l?H!Tl*?*: l';Li'H}""""1PllT"*,,?iTi:^t:'Itri*fr fi;#;;;'*Hl,"iil;paftieipetion in the p.trtr9glfEg._ss, p.s't (pp z3z - il ffffiment thet rhe politiool-and election be "equally open to par ses leading to nomination ion by the goup in ques- to Ecis@rins and votinc.tion" extends beyond fdrmilorolfici The rcrson for the rei{ili.tm-"n-of constEi"e "tevident. particularlv at i time of ,.n"*.d e;;;;"" , Q-'sa&' Eo-;o.:. 3 P'{f Lrtl Other Constnrctivu Efiorts tunitv for minoritv oarticioaiion fnir statnte listi i,wo of'the most likelv channels for such efiorts: (l) enhanced ooportunitv for rcqisrrrtioi: and (2) the appointrnent of mrnonw er&cron ofrcrars tnirrranorrr- r.np rrrrrqrffiiititGrti? tive rssistrotion practiceiand procedures, such as restriatod hours ud locatio"ns for recistrstion. duof rpcigtrati6n practices, and discrimine' tory rcregistration rcquifuments,-which contqlg to €rigc tlmughout through tu" tppoiif,' ment-of deputy rcgistrars who ore prcscnt at locations accesibte rc | , minoritv ciiizeirs. o-fferins evenins arid wekend recistmrion hourq or I providiiq patcard rcci;Etion.bth"r eramplesif curdrnctive ef' lf iorts incfude eppointming of minority citi4ns as deputy registrpra or I pollworkers, oi -othcr oftcials, thcrcliy iadicrting to .mlngrlty g1guq I mcmbers that they ero eucourrged to ptrttcipste rn the Pouucd I PTOeSE