Notice and Motion to Intervene as a Plaintiff in a Class Action; Complaint of Intervening Plaintiffs
Public Court Documents
August 12, 1969
8 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hardbacks. Notice and Motion to Intervene as a Plaintiff in a Class Action; Complaint of Intervening Plaintiffs, 1969. c3c854f2-2d34-f111-88b4-0022482cdbbc. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/6888cda0-b7bc-4499-9891-a5ad8a51fd1b/notice-and-motion-to-intervene-as-a-plaintiff-in-a-class-action-complaint-of-intervening-plaintiffs. Accessed June 02, 2026.
Copied!
[||3a546a02-dfeb-41df-9e1d-7d92910b83d4||] Q |
r
IN THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
JAMES E. SWANN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
VS.
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION,
a public body corporate; WILLIAM E. POE;
HENDERSON BELK; DAN HOOD; BEN F. HUNTLEY;
BETSEY KELLY; COLEMAN W. KERRY, JR.;
JULIA MAULDEN; SAM McNINCH, III; CARLTON
G. WATKINS; THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD
OF EDUCATION, a public body corporate; and
DR. A. CRAIG PHILLIPS, SUPERINTENDENT OF
PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF THE STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA,
Defendants.
V
a
r
”
N
t
”
S
a
”
i
a
a
”
a
?
N
t
a
i
?
a
”
a
t
i
”
u
d
”
S
u
”
u
i
”
“
u
r
s
”
NOTICE OF MOTION TO INTERVENE
AS A PLAINTIFF IN A CLASS ACTION
Pursuant to Rule Five of the Federal Rules of Civil Proce-
dure, as amended, notice is hereby given that George Parker,
Ned Lyerly, Paul Kidwell, M. L. Winters, and others
situated in the Paw Creek School District of Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina, by their undersigned counsel, will move the
Court on August 12, 1969, or as soon thereafter as counsel can
be heard to intervene in the above entitled action as a matter
of right, will move for leave to file Supplemental Complaint,
and will move the Court to restrain the defendants from effect-
ing so much of the defendant's administrative plan previously
filed herein as affects Paw Creek Elementary School.
Respectfully submitted,
(Gey
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 1974
similarly
fei
Attorney for
Intervening Pl (Ls.
Whitfield, McNeely and
901 Flizabeth Avenue
Suite 503
Charlotte, North Carolina 28204
WHITFIELD, McNEELY AND ECHOLS eo ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Echols
CHARLOTTE, N. C.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the fore-
going Notice of Motion was served upon counsel for the Charlotte-
Mecklenburg Board of Education; William E. Poe; Henderson Belk;
Dan Hood; Ben F. Huntley; Betsey Kelly; Coleman W. Kerry, Jr.;
Julia Maulden; Sam McNich, III and Carlton S. Watkins,
defendants; and was served upon counsel for the plaintiffs,
by depositing copies of same in the United States Mail, postage
prepaid, addressed to:
Brock Barkley, Esq.
Law Building
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
William J. Waggoner, Esq.
Weinstein, Waggoner, Sturges and Odom
1100 Barringer Office Tower
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Gaston H. Gage, Fsq.
Grier, Parker, Poe, Thompson,
Bernstein, Gage and Preston
1014 Law Building
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Conrad O. Pearson
203 1/2 East Chapel Hill Street
Durham, North Carolina
Chambers, Stein, Ferguson & Lanning
216 West Tenth Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
Jack Greenburg
James M. Nabrit, III
Norman Chachkin
10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York 10019
This the 1llth day of
ttorney for ff / J
Intervening Plaintiffs
WHITFIELD, McNEELY AND ECHOLS eo ATTORNEYS AT LAW e CHARLOTTE, N. C.
IN TBE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
JAMES E. SWANN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
VS. CIVIL ACTION
NO. 1974
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BOARD
OF EDUCATION, et al.,
Defendants.
N
a
”
N
a
s
”
N
a
”
N
a
t
?
w
i
”
N
k
”
N
i
?
N
a
”
N
u
i
?
N
e
”
u
t
?
u
i
t
?
MOTION TO INTERVENE IN A CLASS ACTION
Pursuant to Notice heretofore served upon Brock Barkley,
Esg.; William J. Waggoner, Esq.; Gaston H. Gage, Esqg.; Conrad
O. Pearson, Esq.; Jack Greenburg, Esg.; James N. Nabritt, III,
Esqg.; Norman Chackin, Esg.; and Chambers, Stein, Ferguson &
Lanning, Attorneys of Record for the plaintiffs and defendants
in th above entitled action, George Parker, Ned Lyerly, Paul
Kidwell, M. L. Winters and others similarly situated in the
Paw Creek School District of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina,
by and through their undersigned counsel, respectfully moves the
Court for leave to intervene as plaintiffs herein on the ground
that the present plaintiffs herein do not fairly and adequately
protect the interests of the residents of the Paw Creek School
District of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, and for an Order
permitting George Parker, Ned Lyerly, Paul Kidwell, M. L. Winters
and others similarly situated in the Paw Creek School District
of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, to adopt the Complaint of
the plaintiffs and file a Supplemental Complaint and other plead-
ings; and further, counsel for intervening plaintiffs will move
WHITFIELD, McNEELY AND ECHOLS o ATTORNEYS AT LAW ¢ CHARLOTTE, N.C,
the Court for an Order restraining the defendants, and their
servants, agents and employees from implementing the administra-
tive plan previously filed herein regarding the operation of
the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools for the academic year 1969-
1970 insofar as it relates to the moving of mobile classroom
units at Paw Creek Elementary School and insofar as it relates
to the division of Paw Creek Elementary School into two physical
plants as proposed by the defendants.
Respectfully submitted this 12th day of Augyst, 1969.
Attorney fo
Intervening
Whitfield, Hl oNeoly and Echols
901 Elizabeth Avenue
Suite 503
Charlotte, North Carolina 28204
WHITFIELD, McNEELY AND ECHOLS ¢ ATTORNEYS AT LAW CHARLOTTE, N. C.
IN THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
GEORGE PARKER, NED LYERLY, PAUL
KIDWELL, M. L. WINTERS and others
similarly situated in the Paw
Creek School District of Mecklen-
burg County, North Carolina,
Plaintiffs,
VS. CiVIL ACTION
: NO. 1974
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BOARD
OF EDUCATION, et al., :
Defendants.
N
a
s
t
”
N
a
?
N
a
”
N
a
s
”
a
t
?
a
”
N
u
”
a
i
t
a
t
”
a
d
?
“
a
i
”
i
d
?
“
a
?
“
u
i
t
”
COMPLAINT OF INTERVENING PLAINTIFFS
l. Plaintiffs are citizens of the County of Mecklenburg,
State of North Carolina, and are all residents of the Paw Creek
School District who bring this action under Rule 24 (a) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as amended for the reason that
thoy are so situated that the disposition of the action may
impair or impede their ability to protect their interests and
for the reason that the intervening plaintiffs interests are not
adequately represented by existing parties to the action above
entitled.
2. That pursuant to previous Order of the Court in the
cause the defendant, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education,
caused to be promulgated on or about July 23, 1969, a plan pur-
porting to be a plan of desegregation for the public school
system of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
WHITFIELD, McNEELY AND ECHOLS e ATTORNEYS AT LAW e CHARLOTTE, N.C,
3. That the intervening plaintiffs are citizens and
residents of the Paw Creek Flementary School District located
within the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School System, which Flementary
School is one of the largest plants within the local school
system and which Elementary School has been integrated without
incident for a period of several years.
4. That the intervening plaintiffs are informed, believe
and therefore allege that the defendant School Board proposes
in its plan of desegregation to take from the Paw Creek Flemen-
tary School eight (8) mobile classroom teaching units and to
| place said units otherwise within the system, all according to
its purported plan of organization.
5. That these intervening plaintiffs are informed, believe
\| and therefore allege that the defendant School Board proposes
further to physically divide Paw Creek Elementary School into
two (2) physical plants, the second of which would be operated
at Woodland School, a building which has been discontinued for
use for school purvoses, that fifth and sixth grade students
from Paw Creek Elementary School would be bussed involuntarily
to Woodland School to attend classes.
6. That these intervening plaintiffs are informed, believe
and therefore allege that the defendant School Board proposes
to involuntarily bus fifth and sixth grade Paw Creek Flementary
School students against the wishes of their parents approximately |
two (2) miles from Paw Creek Elementary School to Woodland School
over narrow, winding roads containing numerous traffic hazards |
including five (5) railroad grade crossings, none of which are
adequately protected by way of electric signs, signals, gates or other warnings; by the intersection of three (3) major traffic
arteries controlled only by wooden and metal stop signs, and |
WHITFIELD, McNEELY AND ECHOLS ¢ ATTORNEYS AT LAW e CHARLOTTE, N. C.
¥ i
I
|
hoof }
}
|
Hi
{
which narrow roadway winds through an industrial area of oil
depots, and which road carries heavy traffic from passenger
vehicles and heavy tractor-trailer oil rigs.
7. That these intervening plaintiffs are informed, believe
and therefore allege that the defendant School Board further
proposes to provide one school principal to oversee and superin-
tend the educational processes at Paw Creek Elementary School
and Woodland Elementary School in contravention to previous
School Board policy and practice and sound educational practices.
8. That the intervening plaintiffs are informed, believe
and therefore allege that the defendant School Board further
proposes that fifth and sixth grade students from Paw Creek
Elementary School be bussed involuntarily from Paw Creek Elemen-
tary School to Woodland School, and that students in the fifth
and sixth grades will be required to provide their own transpor-
tation to and from Paw Creek Elementary School from distances
up to three (3) miles, in contravention of the policy and prac-
tice of the defendant School Board and in contravention of North
Carolina General Statute 115-183 (4), which Statute provides for
bussing of students who live at distances greater than one and
one-half miles from the school plant at which they attend classes.
9. That these intervening plaintiffs are without remedy in
law and should the mobile classroom teaching units as above men-
tioned be removed from the premises of Paw Creek Elementary
School and the School divided into two (2) physical plants grave
and irreparable damage would be done to Ehass intervening plain-
tiffs and the other parents and citizens of the Paw Creek
School District.
WHEREFORE the intervening plaintiffs pray the Court that
the defendant School Board, its servants, agents and employees
WHITFIELD, McNEELY AND ECHOLS o ATTORNEYS AT LAW e CHARLOTTE, N.C,
be restrained from moving any and all mobile classroom teaching
units at Paw Creek Elementary School, further be restrained
from physically dividing Paw Creek Elementary School into two
physical plants, further be restrained from involuntarily bussing
fifth and sixth grade students from Paw Creek Elementary School
to Woodland School, and otherwise be restrained from implemen=-
ting any portion of plans previously proposed to the Court or
any plans to be proposed to the Court in the future insofar as
such plans affect Paw Creek Elementary School by the division
thereof into two (2) or more physical plants and the involuntary
bussing of fifth and sixth grade students therein.
Vo - ‘1
Attorne: £ f/inteffrening Hlaintiffs
Whitfield //MNcNee® and Echols
901 Elizabeth Avenue
Suite 503
Charlotte, North Carolina 28204
WHITFIELD, McNEELY AND ECHOLS e ATTORNEYS AT LAW ¢ CHARLOTTE, N., C, [||3a546a02-dfeb-41df-9e1d-7d92910b83d4||]