Order Authorizing Modified Busing Requirements and Denying Stay

     [||3936edb0-9ac8-4d40-9676-f338b7968d98||] UNIT TY OMA MIT 
INLTED oe 0 0 WE 

  

Bs i py TY Wie op ots ay hth od - 
James FE. Swann, et al. ’ 

do mu £20 A vn tn 7 YT ~ 
Pl: a i nNviiis Ap nellees, 

versus 

Charlotte~-Meckienburg Board of 
-’ 

Education, er al., 
-~ vt A LY oa i § 

eren dants Appell ante, H 

and 

Honorable Robert W. Scott, Governor 

of the State of North Carolina, et al., 

: Additional Parties 

Defendants Appellants. |   
  

  

  

i 
ns : 

$ 
| 

% HT i, ST ORD BE R 

one ec - — d= Re hs a - be all Y WAN TY pont a on ~ +4 TA 

An application for a stay pending appeal of the 

gd raga vp oom abn Ty - 3 Ne Phe J TE | 3 my oy pe PN he § 7 ae 

order of the District Court dated February 5, 1970 made to 

| 
| ] 

N J pi es TOTS Vy ~~ 1 4 “~~ =~ i ands dl de. ~ hp! +3 YY TT - Ae Hy sats bl = an 4 i 

Judge Craven was by him referred to the entire Court pursuant | 

to Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

pon consideration by the full Court, it appears 

Th J An Em a a sin = 2 i REI OE J 
that Aisposition OF thas appeal wlll Gependa 1n parc upoi a 

Fi 

’ - 

g
r
 

S
S
 

A 
SY

S 
S
O
R
A
 
A
 

I 
YA

 
A
 

resolution of factual questions as yet undetermined in the 

District Court. Specifically, the parties are in wide 

}] 

disagreement as to the impact of the order upon the School 

™ ah it YEO igi 5 Be va er wh . b= ay PL em 1 er Jl IR RE pe ~ 

3oard's transportation system, the number oI pupils for whom 

de mm am Cr py me oy " y 71 33 He YC 111 +e Sv AAT + e I 11 ML ~SY 

cransportacill wil SHS A SC guire d under the order, the numer 

oN - reves To AG in A hr iit apr a A AY 2 vr] oo | gmt gree Fic pre apg a eh SpA Fin MRT 

OL SCHOOL DUSEes NeeteC To proviae such LY Alls PO LH 241.050, the ii i 

: ~ 

availability, and the cost of their -acquisitior 5 

i 

0 ~ ~~ cS | dein Pe ‘ 3 Na EE ~ “NTT ES CS 3 ~ 
ig resOilaticiy Lo-sSucny actual lssies 15 ne 

 



  

  

  

nw — yen ak ale ~ de 3-1 PR RR > ey ve oh ph TE CWE de am CY Ee 

they are wlio EeQ Eco Lhe OL gaey's Yeqg a 3 rompentc tid WL anspokl ta 
EN 

Jui 
£2 i Lo 

YS TA or Ps ro 

tion be px -ovide 38 LOX pupils cass Lgned unex the rder. 

To facilitate the hearing and the disposition of 

this appez.. ithe District Court is requested, after such 

evidentiary hearings as may be necessary, to make supplemental 

act respecting the general issue of busing and 

the effect of its order with respect 1O the number of pupils 

transported, the number of buses required, thelr availability. 

and the additional capital and operating costs of transporta- 

rict Court is requeste ed, if possible, to 

file a supplemental order Or memorandum, including such 

findings of fact, by March 20, 1970. | 

This appeal 1s accelerated. The hearing of the 

appeal will be scheduled in the Court OL Appeals in Ric hmond, 

virginia, on April 9, 1976, and the att orneys for all 

parties are directed to file their briefs in the office of 

iy 

the Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 

not later than Tuesdav, April 7, 1970. 

gince it appears that the appeal cannot be heard 

and determined prior | to April 1, /1970, the date for imple- 

| 
/ 

mentation of the first phase of the order of the District 

court, and since the court of Appeals 1s presently unable 

- 

to appraise, in the absence OX +he requested additional 

findings of fact, the impact of the busing requirements, 

IT IS NOW ORDERED +hat the order of the District 

court dated February 5. 1970 be, and it hereby is, stayed 

- 

pv 4 

insofar as it requires the reassignment OL 

  

& 
E 

] 
g 

i 

  

i
S
 

t
H
E
 

i 
—
—
 

 



  

RATAN OT SAR SE gre aa RAEI Fr ET mans 
  

> 

de sam rm SA TYE At Y AT wwr~11 14 3 ~ YT TJ ovrvmA AY 3 ~ Vv ~1 4 - 

Xoo 1] 1 SDV Y .CR LL. #§ Ol i WO A a Cl De fa No Lu 1. CA MIA |W | QO FB LLE on L W1i0 ci Lt 

~% dn ap do am - vs vs yo x. 7} — x Tw 1 YS PF $e win a om 3 — 

now not transporied OX wip are No WwW PDCl1Ng ransporc 840 -0C 
" i - y 

x i aie . AEE 
El CN ni Eo I wi T= | ~ CC NT vA yes A - mp 

SUDS antiaily less distance ang 
». 

. . ~~ «mY YY IRIAN. abr tr I, Pa ER) 0. A ATE ~ 11 4 ~ f+ +The ~ = | =~ 

such reassignmencs Delllyg CLHOsC arising our or che pairing and 

~ 

clustering of schools with resulting cross-busing. 

m 3 " PR Rap TR do Ty my te You hy Vy Bg pn wn ele ma OL ME - J A + 

To the extent that the stay granted by this order 
A 

" 1a F949 "oe ~~ TM TIX PE eT — vy (PAE a T= Te ol - +A y ~ ) dr 

Such: mrogiiications as nay appeax approprida LS O the District 

court to schieve a cohesive and efficient system of public 

education are authorized. 

t=
 

I
d
 

Q ® 'C (T
 

<!
 

»
 

. 

c
r
 H 0)
 

wn
 

'S
 

0
)
 0Q Tr
 

1)
 

O or
 

y
t
 

=)
 Md o j
o
 

n {o
e}

 

= MD Q
 o -
 o 5 cr
 

n O i 

the order which are hereby stayed and the Xesulting necessary 
L - 

modifications hereby authorized, . the application for a stay 

ct
 

y
 

()
 0 Hs
 

[o
F 

D = Oo
 

Hh
 " 5 oO
 U +
 wn
 

K I
 0 f
r
 

is denied, and implementation oi 

Court is directed at the times and in the manner specifie 

~~ f= SVE ON — Vo ol va oid Sih my 0, TN a ve ab a EE BT 8 
therein, subject TO tic Ludldilcr OL IETS OL Cu 

ultimate disposition of the appeal. This is in conformity 

A the general direction of the Supreme Court that orders 

t
+
 wi 

1 

of the District Court shall be implemented sending the heara 
i - 

and determination of appeals from such orders. Alexander v. 

pis 

Holmes County Board of Education, 396 U.S. 19; Carter Vv. West 

Feliciana Parish School Board, U.S. {January 14, 1970). 

By direction of the Court. 2 

ull EE 3 pi Cu / 

/ « V 74 ; ig / io ERY J / 

aoe are gn el tnt eg 

Chief Judge, 

   

L
A
 

p
r
 

h
h
 

i
i
a [||3936edb0-9ac8-4d40-9676-f338b7968d98||]