Motion for Extension of Time to Take Depositions

    CV 89-0360977S 

SUPERIOR COURT LX
] MILO SHEFF, et al., 

Plaintiffs, : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF 

: HARTFORD/NEW BRITAIN 

Vv. : AT HARTFORD 

WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, et al., : 

Defendants. : SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS 
  

Pursuant to the final pretrial order entered in this matter, 

the defendants are required to take the depositions of the 

plaintiffs' "outside" expert witnesses on or before October 15, 

1992. The defendants have undertaken this task but have been 

advised by the plaintiffs’ attorneys that three of the 

plaintiffs' "outside" expert witnesses cannot appear on dates 

which are available before October 15, 1992. The plaintiffs have 

offered alternative dates after October 15, 1992 for these three 

witnesses. The defendants have agreed to schedule these 

witnesses on the dates suggested by the plaintiffs' attorneys. 

Under the above noted circumstances, the defendants cannot 

take the depositions of all of the plaintiffs' outside expert 

NO ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED 

NO TESTIMONY REQUIRED   
 



  

    

      

witnesses on or before October 15, 1992 as they are required to 

do by the pretrial order. 

To accommodate the schedules of the plaintiffs' "outside" 

experts, the defendants need an extension of time until October 

20, 1992 to complete those depositions. The defendants reserve 

the right to request a postponement of the date for trial for 

reasons which will probably become more apparent after the 

conclusion of the depositions which have been delayed at the 

plaintiffs' request. 

The plaintiffs have been contacted in regard to this motion 

and have no objection to the extension of time to complete 

depositions, but note that they would object to any request for 

postponement of the trial date. 

WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the defendants request 

an extension of time to take the depositions of the plaintiffs’ 

  
 



  

  

      

"outside" expert witnesses giving the defendants until October 

20, 1992, 

FOR THE DEFENDANTS 

RICHARD BLUMENTHAL 

ATTO Y GENERAL 

Zia § : 

\ NL’ 

Jo R. Whelan - Juris 085112 
ASsAstant Attorney General 
A110 Sherman Street 
‘Hartford, Connecticut 06105 

fZ31: Bass A 

7 
7 

  

By: 
  

    

  

   

     

  

< Juri 

Assistant Attorpey General 
¥10 Sherman Street 
Hartford, Connecticut 06105 
Tel, 566-7173 

  

  

 



    

ORDER   For a good cause shown, the foregoing motion is hereby 

| GRANTED/DENIED. 

By the Court 

  

Honorable Harry Hammer 

CERTIFICATION 
  

This is to certify that on this 28th day of September, 1992 

a copy of the foregoing was mailed to the following counsel of 

record: 

John Brittain, Esq. Wilfred Rodriguez, Esq. 
University of Connecticut Hispanic Advocacy Project 
School of Law Neighborhood Legal Services 
65 Elizabeth Street 1229 Albany Avenue 
Hartford, CT 06105 Hartford, CT..06112 

Philip Tegeler, Esq. Wesley W. Horton, Esq. 
Martha Stone, Esq. Moller, Horton & 
Connecticut Civil Fineberg, P.C. 
Liberties Union 90 Gillett Street 
32 Grand Street Hartford, CT 06105 
Hartford, CT 06105 

Ruben Franco, Esq. Julius L. Chambers, Esq. 
Jenny Rivera, Esq. Marianne Lado, Esq. 
Puerto Rican Legal Defense Ronald Ellis, Esq. 
and Education Fund NAACP Legal Defense Fund and 
99 Hudson Street Education Fund, Inc. 
l4th Floor 99 Hudson Street 
New York, NY 10013 New York, NY 10013     
  

 



    

John A. Powell, Esq. 

Helen Hershkoff, Esq. 
| Adam S. Cohen, Esq. 
|| American Civil Liberties Union 

132 West 43rd Street 
New York, NY 10036 

    / 
74 

7 pe 

4% 
/ 

/ 
/ / ; 

/ A V4 A 

y 4 / ;-. if 

| | Zo 7 vi / 2 4 

  

John R. Whelan 
‘Assistant Attorney General