Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Kathleen Bell, Esq. Re Whitfield v. Clinton
Correspondence
October 21, 1986

Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Kathleen Bell, Esq. Re Whitfield v. Clinton, 1986. a4313093-e992-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/6bee84d4-dee3-421d-b99d-3a1c0f155113/correspondence-from-lani-guinier-to-kathleen-bell-esq-re-whitfield-v-clinton. Accessed October 08, 2025.
Copied!
October 21, 1986 Re: Whitfield v. Clinton Dear Kathleen: As promised, r encrose an amended complaint, a motion to amend, and a supportingi memorandum. These documents are arrready to be filed, subject, of course, to your review andapproval. on the memorandum, you need to insert the date of theJudgers recent order, and each of the documents needs acertificate of service. other than the changes r mentioned on the phone, we tried topresen/e the approach to the complaj-nt reflected in your initialdraft. Please call if you have any reservations at ilr aboutthings we have omitted or included. we are real1y looking forward to working together on thiscase. rt is LDF poricy that arr cooperating-attorneys filr outan agreement to cover distribution of any funds recovered in theevent plaintiffs prevail. Please review the attached agreement and return a signed gopy to me as soon as possibre. rn addition,as we have already discussed, you have agreed to give LDFattorneys.an opportunity to review any papers before they arefiled. Final1y, we need to work out I Ludget for this case thatwill reflect the amount of money LDF wirr contribute to the expenses of the lit,igation. you can submit a proposed budgetwith the cooperating attorney agreement or we Lan- d.iscuss itfurther over the phone. Kathleen BeII, Esq. Wilson, BeII & Neal 130 Columbia Street Helena, Arkansas 72342 I hope to hear from you soon. Siry>gceLy, /XA/*\/ 'r,)#i Guinier LG:pk