Letter from Court to All Counsel RE: Disclosure of Expert Witnesses

Public Court Documents
September 28, 1992

Cite this item
Letter from Court to All Counsel RE: Disclosure of Expert Witnesses preview

2 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Letter from Court to All Counsel RE: Disclosure of Expert Witnesses, 1992. 0876bcee-a546-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/6d45c210-6b18-4218-9f6d-e84c3d2c182f/letter-from-court-to-all-counsel-re-disclosure-of-expert-witnesses. Accessed July 29, 2025.

    Copied!

    * * 

  

MacKenzie Hall 

110 Sherman Street 

Hardord, CT 06105 

RICHARD BLUMENTHAL 
ATTORNEY GENERAL 

FAX (203) 523-5536 

  

Office of The Artornev General 

State of Connecticut Tel: 566-7173 

September 28, 1992 

Philip Tegeler, Esq. 
Martha Stone, Esq. 

Connecticut Civil Liberties Union 
32 Grand Street 

Hartford, CT 06105 

RE: SHEFF v. O'NEILL/DEFENDANTS' DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES 
  

Dear Phil & Martha: 

This is to advise you that the following individuals will 
not be listed expert witnesses in the defendants' October 4, 1992 
Disclosure of Expert Witnesses: Douglas Rindone, William 
Conjero, Peter Behuniak, Elliott Williams, Robert Brewer, Peter 
Prowda, Theodore Sergi, Thomas Breen, and Patricia Downs. You 
will note that a number of these individuals will be listed as 
"non-expert witnesses" in the defendants' September 29, 1992 
Disclosure of Non-Expert Witnesses. 

To be sure that you do not draw any erroneous inferences 
from the fact that the names of certain individuals have been 
deleted from our list of "expert witnesses" and not included on 
our list of "non-expert witnesses", we want you to know that we 
are not waiving the right to call any of the witnesses whose 
names have been deleted from our lists if, at some point before 
or even during the trial, we deem their testimony necessary or 
helpful to the defendants' case. The list of expert and 
non-expert witnesses we will be providing you identifies those 
individuals who we expect to call to the stand at this time. As 
we learn more about the plaintiffs' case through depositions 
which are underway, through our additional efforts to obtain 
complete answers to discovery requests, and through the 
presentation of the plaintiffs' case at trial, we expect to be 
adding to our list of witnesses. It is at least theoretically 
possible that some of the individuals who we are no longer 
listing as witnesses will be called depending on the evidence 
being presented by the plaintiffs, 

  

 



  

Philip Tegeler, Esq. 

Martha Stone, Esq. 
September 28, 1992 
Page 2 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

Very truly yours, 

BLUMENTHAL 

  

JRW:ac [/ 

Vv 

CC: To All Counsel of Record

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top