Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Kathleen Bell, Esq. Re Whitfield v. Clinton
Correspondence
March 18, 1987

Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Kathleen Bell, Esq. Re Whitfield v. Clinton, 1987. 39373ab9-ea92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/6d9adab5-d6b4-4a6a-9066-25151d460925/correspondence-from-lani-guinier-to-kathleen-bell-esq-re-whitfield-v-clinton. Accessed October 09, 2025.
Copied!
Lesa,EDrenseH. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND' INC. 99 Hudson Street, New York, N.Y. 10013 o (2121219-1900 March 18, L987 Kathleen Bell, Esq. Wilson, BeII & Neal 1.30 Columbia Street Helene, Arkansas 72342 Re: Whitfield v. Clinton Dear Kathleen: Enclosed are our proposed interrogatory answers to both sets ofinterrogatories. r hope they are satisfactory. rf sor please send them to Tim Humphries with the necessary attachmentl. I understand your secretary has already prepared those attachments, but you may want to double check the references in our reviseddraft. EIY, Guinier LG/r Enclosures Contributione are deductible for U.S. ineome tat purposes The i{AACp Leoat Delense & Educational Fund, lnc. (LDD is not part ot the Nalional Association lor the Advarcement ot Colored Ptople (t{.fACP) although ii#ff;t,ffiil'b;rft fiilciiil lljies irscbmmimenr roeqriatrighrs. LoF has had lor over25years a separale Board, program,slatl, otfice and budget.