Motion for Extension of Time in Which to File Objections to Magistrate's Findings and Recommendations

Public Court Documents
July 25, 1986

Cite this item

Motion for Extension of Time in Which to File Objections to Magistrate's Findings and Recommendations preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

LDF Attorney
- Lani Guinier
Matter
- Major v. Treen
Case
- Major v. Treen
U.S. state
- Louisiana
Collection
- Case Files
Creator
Publisher
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 92733949-c803-ef11-a1fd-002248219001

Cite this item

Case Files, Major v. Treen Hardbacks. Motion for Extension of Time in Which to File Objections to Magistrate's Findings and Recommendations, 1986. 92733949-c803-ef11-a1fd-002248219001. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/6efb9d6a-7dad-441d-825a-59e64d0c2317/motion-for-extension-of-time-in-which-to-file-objections-to-magistrates-findings-and-recommendations. Accessed November 05, 2025.

Copied!

    - 

hy STATES DISTRICT COURT 

< EASTERN DISTRICT OP oN 

Luk i Is A 

sas sons om AL CLERRcIvIL acTION 

VERSUS NUMBER 82-1192 

DAVID TREEN, ET AL SECTION: C (£3 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE 
OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE'S FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

  

  

  

NOW INTO COURT, through undersigned counsel, come 

plaintiffs in this matter, who respectfully request that they be 

allowed until Friday, August 8, 1986 to file objections to the 

Findings and Recommendations of Magistrate Alma L. Chasez 

regarding the appropriate amount of attorney fees to be awarded 

in this matter. 

The reasons for this request are many: First, the 

Findings and Recommendations of the Magistrate are 61 pages long. 

Second, trial counsel for plaintiffs in the attorney fees only 

received the findings on July 17, 1986. Third, there are several 

recent U.S. Supreme Court cases which bear directly on the issue 

before the Court and need to be briefed (including Pennsylvania 
  

v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air, 54 LW5017). 
  

For these reasons, plaintiffs request until August 8, 

1986 to file objections to the Magistrate's Findings. 

2 8 JUL 1986 

DATE OF ENTRY coe...  



Respectfully submitted, 

BLACKSHER, MENEFEE & STEIN, 

P.A. 

405 Van Antwerp Bldg. 
P. O. Box 1051 
Mobile, Alabama 36633 
(205) 433-2000 

ly ie L/ fe 
LARRY T. MENEFEE/ [ 
  

WILLIAM P. QUIGLEY 

STEVEN SCHECKMAN 

631 St. Charles Ave. 
New Orleans, LA 70130 
(504) 524-0016 

R. JAMES KELLOGG 

840 Gov. Nichols 
New Orleans, LA 70116 
(504) 524-2487 

STANLEY HALPIN 

2206 W. St. Mary 
Lafayette, LA 70506 

LANI GUINIER 

LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 

99 Hudson Street 
l6th Floor 

New York, New York 10013 
(212) 219-1900 

ARMAND DERFNER 

Box 608 

Charleston, S.C. 29402 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs  



ORDER 

Considering the foregoing, it is ordered that 

plaintiffs have until August 8, 1986 to file objections to the 

Findings of the Magistrate in this matter. 

New Orleans, Louisiana 

  

| fla i > 777) D 

as Bu 2.5. y§¢ AK LZ. ve Jol] f 
J UPDATE U.S. DISTRICT SUntE 

ROBERT F. COLLINS 

  

Certificate Service 
| certify that a copy of the foregoing pleading 

hes been served upon qoynsel for all parties 

to this ding, by mailing the same to 

each by 2 class United St S15tos mail, propers- 

ly addressed and pos stage prepaid on tivis 

19

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Motion for Extension of Time in Which to File Objections to Magistrate's Findings and Recommendations

LDF Attorney

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Creator

Publisher

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in