Defendant Wood's Response to Houston Lawyers' Association's Reply Brief
Public Court Documents
October 18, 1989
7 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Defendant Wood's Response to Houston Lawyers' Association's Reply Brief, 1989. 21e7ccf2-247c-f011-b4cc-6045bdffa665. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/6f3b10bd-cf82-4fe3-8ae6-688787a4c820/defendant-woods-response-to-houston-lawyers-associations-reply-brief. Accessed November 06, 2025.
Copied!
SIN.
~~ Lr. R
PorRTER & CLEMENTS RY
A WA A
FIRST REPUBLICBANK CENTER &// Lal { INA ‘
4 a. 7b, 700 LOUISIANA, SUITE 3500 TR ¢/ /
Se: VO VY, HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-2730 Yo. A, y . LN.
ATTORNEYS Xs, TEN Opn XK /
Wy DNV As) NA
A PARINERSINE INDLUDING TELEPHONE (713) 226-0600 Na v 7/7 PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS he CHEW gg ; TELECOPIER (713) 228-1331 dl V
TELECOPIER (713) 224-4835 Soi N2Y/
EVELYN V. KEYES TELEX 775-348 be, WY
(713) 226-061 S,
October 18, 1989
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
Mr. John Neil
Clerk, U.S. District Court
200 FE. Wall St., Suite 316
Midland, Texas 79702
Re: No. MO88-CA-154; League of United Latin American
Citizens (LULAC), et al. v. James Mattox, Attorney
General of Texas, et al.; In the United States District
Court for the Western District of Texas, Midland-Odessa
Division
Dear Mr. Neil:
Enclosed for filing in the above-referenced case is Defen-
dant Wood's Response to Houston Lawyers' Association's Reply
Brief.
Please return a file stamped copy of this document to me in
the enveloped provided.
A copy of this filing is being served on counsel of record
by first class mail, postage prepaid.
Sincerely yours,
Grit Vfl
Evelyn V. Keyes
EVK/cdf
enclosures
cc: Mr. William L. Garrett
Ms. Brenda Hall Thompson
Garrett, Thompson & Chang
Attorneys at Law
8300 Douglas, Suite 800
Dallas, Texas 75225
Mr. Rolando L. Rios
Southwest Voter Registration &
Education Project
201 N, St. Mary's, Suite 521}
San Antonio, Texas 78205
i
ad
PorTER & CLEMENTS
Mr. John Neil
October 18, 1989
Page -2-
CC: Ms. Susan Finkelstein
Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc.
201 N. St. Mary's, Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78205
Mr. Julius Levonne Chambers
Ms, ‘Sherrilyn a. 1fill
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson Street, 16th Floor
New York, New York 10013
Ms. Gabrielle K. McDonald
Matthews & Branscomb
301 Congress Ave., Suite 2050
Austin, Texas 78701
Mr. Jim Mattox, Attorney General of Texas
Ms. Mary F. Keller, First Assistant Attorney General
Ms. Renea Hicks, Spec. Assistant Attorney General
Mr. Javier Guajardo, Spec. Assistant Attorney General
P, O. Box 12548
Capitol Station
Austin, Texas 78701
Mr. Edward B. Cloutman, III
Mullinax, Wells, Baab & Cloutman, P.C.
3301 Elm Street
Dallas, Texas 75226-1637
Mr. E. Brice Cunningham
777 So. R.L. Thornton Freeway, Suite 121
Dallas, Texas 75203
Mr. Robert H. Mow, Jr.
Hughes & Luce
2800 Momentum Place
1717 Main Street
Dallas, Texas 75201
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN
CITIZENS (LULAC), et al.
Vv. NO. MO-88-CA-154
JIM MATTOX, Attorney General
of the State of Texas, et al. N
W
O
)
WD
WD
)
Dh
WA
DEFENDANT WOOD'S RESPONSE TO HOUSTON
LAWYERS' ASSOCIATION'S REPLY BRIEF
TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:
Defendant-Intervenor Harris County District Judge Wood
("Judge Wood") files this Response to the Houston Lawyers’
Association's ("HLA"'s) Reply Brief, which is untimely and
incorporates matters outside the record to the prejudice of Judge
Wood.
I. THE HILA'S REPLY BRIEF 1S UNTIMELY.
The deadline for filing Post-Trial Briefs in this case was
September 29, 1989, and the deadline for filing Reply Briefs was
October 5, 1989. The HLA failed to serve its Post-Trial Brief on
Judge Wood. She was able to obtain a copy by fax from counsel
for the HLA on October 3, 1989, and timely filed her Reply Brief
by sending it to the Court on October 5, 1989, by Federal Express
in accordance with instructions from the Clerk of the Court. A
week later, after having enjoyed the unique benefit of reading
everyone else's Reply Briefs, the HLA filed its Reply Brief with
the Court and mailed it to Judge Wood. It was received by
counsel for Judge Wood on October 17, 1989, almost two weeks
after the deadline.
Judge Wood files this Response in order to object to the
untimely prejudicial filing of the HLA's Reply Brief -- which
follows on numerous untimely filings and responses by the
Plaintiffs and the HLA in this case -- and to object to the HLA's
reliance in that Reply Brief on matters entirely outside the
record of this case.
II. THE HLA'S REPLY BRIEF INCORPORATES
MATTERS OUTSIDE THE RECORD.
In its Reply to Post-Trial Briefs, the HLA relies in part
upon quoted excerpts of testimony from the trial transcript of
Gingles v, Edmisten, 590 F.Supp. 345 (E.D.N.C. 1984), which it
refers to as "Gingles," thereby confounding the District Court
case with the Supreme Court case of Thornburg v. Gingles, 106
S.Ct. 2752 (1986), which reversed the District Court's opinion in
part and affirmed it in part. The testimony cited purports to
establish that inquiry into partisanship is inappropriate in
determining Voting Rights Act violations.
Since the facts in Edmisten are not in evidence in this case
and its transcript is not part of the record, Judge Wood can only
speculate on the context and even the validity of the quotations
cited by the HLA. Accordingly, she requests that this Court
place no weight on the HLA's citations to Edmisten. Judge Wood
also calls the Court's attention to the fact that the District
Court's opinion in Edmisten was analyzed in Thornburg v. Gingles
by both Justice Brennan and Justice O'Connor without any
reference to the testimony or arguments cited as controlling by
the HLA. Moreover, Justice O'Connor pointed out in her opinion
that only a plurality of the Supreme Court accepted that part of
Justice Brennan's opinion which addressed the validity of the
statistical evidence on which the District Court relied. 106
8.Ct. at 2792 (O'Connor, J. concurring in the Judgment only).
Therefore, the testimony and arguments on which the District
Court relied in Edmisten, and on which the HLA in turn relies,
cannot be said to have been accepted as probative by the Supreme
Court and their value is all the more attenuated in the present
case.
For the foregoing reasons, Judge Wood respectfully requests
that the Court place no ‘weight on: the HLA's citations to
Edmisten.
Respectfully submitted,
PORTER & CLEMENTS
a
Eugene Clements TE"
700 Louisiana, Suite 3500
fouston, Texas 77002-2730
(713) 226-0600
ATTORNEY FOR HARRIS COUNTY
DISTRICT JUDGE SHAROLYN WOOD
OF COUNSEL:
PORTER & CLEMENTS
Evelyn V. Keyes
700 Louisiana, Suite 3500
Houston, Texas 77002-2730
(713) 226-0600
Michael J. Wood
Attorney at Law
440 Louisiana, Suite 200
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 228-5105
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on tne | 9th day of October, 1989, a
true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Defendant Wood' S
Response to Houston Lawyers' Association's Reply Brief was mailed
to counsel of record in this case by first class United States
mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
Mr. William L. Garrett
Ms. Brenda Hall Thompson
Garrett, Thompson & Chang
Attorneys at Law
8300 Douglas, Suite 800
Dallas, Texas 75225
Mr. Rolando L. Rios
Southwest Voter Registration &
Education Project
201° N, St. Mary's, Suite 521
San Antonio, Texas 78205
Ms. Susan Finkelstein
Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc.
201 N. St. Mary's, Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78205
Mr. Julius Levonne Chambers
Ms. Sherrilyn A. Ifill
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson Street
16th Floor
New York, New York 10013
Ms. Gabrielle K. McDonald
Matthews & Branscomb
301 Congress Ave., Suite 2050
Austin, Texas 78701
Mr. Jim Mattox, Attorney General of Texas
Ms. Mary F. Keller, First Assistant Attorney General
Mr. Renea Hicks, Spec. Assistant Attorney General
Mr. Javier Guajardo, Spec. Assistant Attorney General
P.. OO. Box 12548
Capitol Station
Austin, Texas 78701
Mr. Edward B. Cloutman, III
Mullinax, Wells, Baab & Cloutman, P.C.
3301 Elm Street
Dallas, Texas 75226-1637
Mr. E. Brice Cunningham
777 So. R.L.. Thornton Freeway
Suite 121
Dallas, Texas 75203
Mr. Robert H. Mow, Jr.
Hughes & Luce
2800 Momentum Place
1717 Main Street
Dallas, Texas 75201
COWL / byt
“GEvelyy/'¥. Keyes
WO004/40/cdf