Plaintiff-Intervenor Houston Lawyers' Motion for Leave of Court to File in Excess of Ten Requests for Admission
Public Court Documents
August 8, 1989
5 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Plaintiff-Intervenor Houston Lawyers' Motion for Leave of Court to File in Excess of Ten Requests for Admission, 1989. a082f375-247c-f011-b4cc-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/6f9f4de8-60a0-4c37-8141-34f52c1ba4a4/plaintiff-intervenor-houston-lawyers-motion-for-leave-of-court-to-file-in-excess-of-ten-requests-for-admission. Accessed November 07, 2025.
Copied!
#
CAR ly. YAGNER Midland-Odessa Division
wii P. 0. Box 10708
Midland, Texas 79702
UNITED STATES DiIsTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
August 11, 1989
Sherrilyn A. Ifill
99 Hudson St., 16th Floor
New York, NY 10013
Re: LULAC vs. Mattox, et al
Civil Action MO 88 CA 154
Dear Attorney:
Receipt of the following material is acknowledged:
Plaintiff-Intervenor Houston Lawyers Motion for Leave of Court
to File in Excess of Ten Requests for Admission
The document described above is being returned for the following
reason:
xx Rule 300-1 of the Local Rules of this Court require that
all pleadings in civil cases shall be furnished to the Clerk
in duplicate by the parties to said cause
You must include with the original and copy of the pleading
filed with the Clerk a certificate stating the date a true
and correct copy of the pleading was mailed to defendant or
his counsel
All pleadings must be signed by the moving party of his counsel
Rule 300-1 of the Local Rules of this Court require that
depositions, interrogatories, requests for documents, requests
for admissions and answers and responses thereto shall not be
filed unless on order of the court or unless they are needed
for use in a trial or hearing. (copy of Rule 300-1 enclosed)
—XX All motions submitted for filing must have a proposed order.
Sincerely,
CHARLES W. VAGNER. Clerk _
By; A BERT
Encl
August 8, 1989
Hon. John Neil
Deputy Clerk, U.S. Courthouse
P.O. Box 10708
200 E. Wall, Room 316
Midland, Texas 79702
Re: Civil Action No. MO-88-CA-154
LULAC, et al. v. Jim Mattox, et. al.
Dear Mr. Neil:
Enclosed for filing, please find Plaintiff-intervenors, Houston Lawyers’ Association’s Motion for Leave of Court to File in Excess of Ten Requests for Admission. Thank you.
Sincerely,
AA. UV, 4
LY RGAS A
/ “Sherril nA. Ifill
SATI/dm
encl.
cc: All Attorneys of Record
NINETY NINE HUDSON STREET, 16th FLOOR (212) 219-1900 NEW YORK, N.Y. 10013
"® S
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN
CITIZENS (LULAC), et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Houston Lawyers’ Association, Alice
Bonner, Weldon Berry, Francis Williams,
Rev. William Lawson, Deloyd T. Parker,
Bennie McGinty, :
Plaintiff-Intervenors,
vs. No. 88-CA-154
JAMES MATTOX, Attorney General of the
State of Texas, et al.,
Defendants.
PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR HOUSTON LAWYERS’
MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE IN
EXCESS OF TEN REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
In accordance with Rule 300-6(f), plaintiff-intervenors seek
leave of this Court to suspend the operation of the local rule
limiting requests for admission for the pendency of this lawsuit.
This request is made with good cause.
On June 1, 1989, plaintiff-intervenors’ Houston Lawyers’
Association served upon State defendants in the above-captioned
case twenty Requests for Admission. On June 21, 1989, State
defendants objected and refused to answer the last ten requests
*® NS
for admission on the ground that pursuant to Local Rule 300-6(f),
admissions are limited to only ten requests.
On March 1, 1989, this Court entered an order permitting
plaintiffs in this action to request more than ten admissions of
the State defendants. In light of the complex, and Ffact-
intensive nature of this case, and to facilitate productive
discovery, plaintiff-intervenors Houston Lawyers’ Association,
et al, similarly seek leave of this Court to request more than
ten admissions of the defendants.
For the aforementioned reasons which constitute good cause,
plaintiff-intervenors respectfully request that this Court
suspend the operation of Local Rule 300-6(f) for the duration of
this lawsuit.
‘Respectfully submitted,
N py : 2
A 32 7
J/ ad oo yw & . —
fil
Ais Lf 5 CHAMBERS [/
/ SHERRILYN A. IFILL
99 Hudson Street, 16th Floor
New York, New York 10013
Of Counsel: GABRIELLE McDONALD
MATTHEWS & BRANSCOMB 301 Congress Avenue
A Professional Corporation Suite 2050
Austin, Texas 78701
® I
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
27%
day of August, 1989, a
I hereby certify that on this
true and correct copy of the foregoing Plaintiff-intervenors
Houston Lawyers’ Association’s Motion for Leave of Court to File
in Excess of Ten Requests for Admission was mailed to counsel of
record in this case by first class United States mail, postage
pre-paid, as follows:
William L. Garrett
Brenda Hull Thompson
Garrett, Thompson & Chang
8300 Douglas, Suite 800
Dallas, TX 75225
Rolando L. Rios
Southwest Voter Registration
Education Project
201 N. St. Mary’s, Suite 521
San Antonio, TX 78205
Susan Finkelstein
Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc.
201 N. St. Mary’s, Suite 521
San Antonio, TX 78205
Edward B. Cloutman, III.
Mullinax, Wells, Baab &
Cloutman, P.C.
3301 Elm
Dallas, TX 75226-9222
Jim Mattox
Mary F. Keller
Renea Hicks
Javier Guajardo
Attorney General’s Office
P.O. Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711
J. Eugene Clements
John E. O’Neill
Evelyn V. Keys
Porter & Clements
700 Louisiana, Suite 3500
Houston, TX 77002-2730
Michael J. Wood
Attorney at Law
440 Louisiana, Suite 200
Houston, TX 77002
Ken Oden
Travis County Attorney
P.O. Box 1748
Austin, TX 78767
David R. Richards
Special Counsel
600 W. 7th Sst.
Austin, TX 78701
Robert H. Mow, Jr.
Hughes & Luce
2800 Momentum Place
1717 Main Street
Dallas, TX 75201
[ / 9 Ed
¥% Merrdip.- /N- - A L A
Sherrilyn A.J Ifill
Attorney for Plaintiff-Intervenors
Houston Lawyers’ Association