Letter from Lani Guinier to Hon. Alexander Stevas, Clerk RE: Edmisten, et al. v. Ginqles, et al.

Public Court Documents
June 15, 1984

Cite this item

Letter from Lani Guinier to Hon. Alexander Stevas, Clerk RE: Edmisten, et al. v. Ginqles, et al. preview

1 page

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Collection
- Legal Department General
Creator
- Lani Guinier and others
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 1add07c3-e592-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Letter from Lani Guinier to Hon. Alexander Stevas, Clerk RE: Edmisten, et al. v. Ginqles, et al., 1984. 1add07c3-e592-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/6fa7d1da-150a-4d43-9795-33eeddc4a2fb/letter-from-lani-guinier-to-hon-alexander-stevas-clerk-re-edmisten-et-al-v-ginqles-et-al. Accessed July 04, 2025.

Copied!

    June 15, 1984

Hon. Alexander Stevas, Clerk
Office of the Clerk
Supreme Court of the United States
Washington, D. C. 20543

RE: No. 83-I968, October Term, I983
Ed.misten, et a1. v. Ginqles, et a1.

Dear Sir:

Pursuant to Rule 34 (5) , the apPellee herewith
reguests an extension of time to and including
Septer,lber 2, 1984, in which to f ile a motion to
dismiss or affirm the appeal taken in this case.
The jurisdictional statement was filed on June
2, 1964 and served upon the aPpellee on June I0,
1984, and unless extended the time for filing
such a motion will expire on July 10, 1984.

This request is made necessary by the fact that
appellee's counsel in North Carolina is scheduled
f;i triat on June 18, 1984, and apPellee's counsel
in New York has previously scheduleo a vacation
for June 27 through July 10, 1984- In addition,
appellee's counsel continue to spend time in this
ciie challenging a portion of the remedy proposed
by appellants. The additional time is therefore
necellary to permit counsel to confer and then to
draft the rnotlon to dismiss or affirm in this i'm-
Portant case.

Appellant's counsel, Kathleen Iieenan t'lcGuan and
l-ames Wallace , Jr. , have consented to thj-s exten-
sion. Appellee believes that this extension will
not unauly delay this Court's consideration of the
appeal and that the Court wiII be able to act upon
the appeal as soon as the new Terrn commences on
October l, 1984.

Sincerely Yours,

Lani Guinier
Attorney for APPeIlee

LGIr

q-;;:-J aQ-i



Hon. Alexander Stevas, Clerk
June 15, 1984

Page Two

cc: Kathleen lleenan McGuan
900 ITth Street, lI.W. Suite 1020
Washington, D.C. 20007

James Wallace, Jr., Esq.
Deputy Attorney General
ItI. C. Department of Justice
Post Office Box 629
P.aleigh, North Carolina 27602

99 HUDSON STREET (212t 21 9-1 900 NEW YORK N, Y 1CC13

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Letter from Lani Guinier to Hon. Alexander Stevas, Clerk RE: Edmisten, et al. v. Ginqles, et al.

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in