Correspondence from Guinier to Reynolds Re: FOIA Request

Correspondence
December 6, 1982

Correspondence from Guinier to Reynolds Re: FOIA Request preview

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Major v. Treen Hardbacks. Correspondence from Guinier to Reynolds Re: FOIA Request, 1982. f8353b78-c903-ef11-a1fd-002248219001. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/7069d86c-2c3a-4a6b-bcb4-527430a9e80f/correspondence-from-guinier-to-reynolds-re-foia-request. Accessed November 05, 2025.

    Copied!

    NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, iNC 

und 10Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 (212) 586-8397 

December 6, 1982 

William Bradford Reynolds 

Assistant Attorney General 

Civil Rights Division 

U.S. Department of Justice 

Washington, D.C. 20530 

Re: Louisiana Congressional 

Redistricting 
  

Dear Mr. Reynolds: 

On June 24, 1982, James Kellogg, Esg., a cooperating 

attorney with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and co-counsel 

in the case, Major v. Treen, Civil Action No. 82-1192, 

United States District Court, Eastern District of 

Louisiana, wrote you a letter, pursuant to the Freedom of 

Information Act, requesting, inter alia, a copy of ‘any 

memoranda generated by the Civil Rights Division, voting 

Section regarding the Louisiana Congressional Redistricting. 

He received a letter from you dated July 19, 1982, enclosing 

a copy of your Memorandum to the File dated June 18, 1982, 

on the subject: Louisiana Congressional Redistricting Plan - 

Section 5 Review (Docket # E 3028). In addition our 

letter advised Mr. Kellogg that the balance of his request 

had been referred to Janet Blizard for consideration. 

  

  

We are still interested in receiving all the requested 

FOIA material, and in particular any memoranda generated by 

the Voting Rights Section analyzing the submission, 

summarizing the facts of the submission and providing 

information on which you relied to make your decision. IF 

the delay in responding to our June 24, 1982, request is due 

to a claim that any of these memoranda may be exempt in 

part or in whole under 5 UsC § 552(b) (5), we wish to call 

your attention to the principle that memoranda containing 

recommendations or conclusions that were adopted by the 

decision maker are not exempt. See e.g., Renegotiation 
  

Contributions are deductible for U.S. income tac purposes 

The NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND is not part of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People although it 

was founded by itand shares its commitment to equal rights. LDF has had for over 25 years a separate Board, program, staff, office and budget.  



  Board v. CGrummon Aircraft, 421 U.S. 168 (1975). 

We would appreciate your prompt attention to this 
request since as you know the matter is in litigation with 
trial scheduled for January 1983. 

Sincerely, .,) 

\' 

INA ALA_ 
a - pl / 

AA INA Le 
  
VLani Guinier 
Lowell Johnston 

Attorneys 

NAACP Legal Defense & Educ. 
und, Inc. 

cc: Janet Blizard, Director FOIA Office 
James Kellogg, Esq. 

LG: ja

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.