Correspondence from Guinier to Reynolds Re: FOIA Request
Correspondence
December 6, 1982
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Major v. Treen Hardbacks. Correspondence from Guinier to Reynolds Re: FOIA Request, 1982. f8353b78-c903-ef11-a1fd-002248219001. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/7069d86c-2c3a-4a6b-bcb4-527430a9e80f/correspondence-from-guinier-to-reynolds-re-foia-request. Accessed November 05, 2025.
Copied!
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, iNC
und 10Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 (212) 586-8397
December 6, 1982
William Bradford Reynolds
Assistant Attorney General
Civil Rights Division
U.S. Department of Justice
Washington, D.C. 20530
Re: Louisiana Congressional
Redistricting
Dear Mr. Reynolds:
On June 24, 1982, James Kellogg, Esg., a cooperating
attorney with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and co-counsel
in the case, Major v. Treen, Civil Action No. 82-1192,
United States District Court, Eastern District of
Louisiana, wrote you a letter, pursuant to the Freedom of
Information Act, requesting, inter alia, a copy of ‘any
memoranda generated by the Civil Rights Division, voting
Section regarding the Louisiana Congressional Redistricting.
He received a letter from you dated July 19, 1982, enclosing
a copy of your Memorandum to the File dated June 18, 1982,
on the subject: Louisiana Congressional Redistricting Plan -
Section 5 Review (Docket # E 3028). In addition our
letter advised Mr. Kellogg that the balance of his request
had been referred to Janet Blizard for consideration.
We are still interested in receiving all the requested
FOIA material, and in particular any memoranda generated by
the Voting Rights Section analyzing the submission,
summarizing the facts of the submission and providing
information on which you relied to make your decision. IF
the delay in responding to our June 24, 1982, request is due
to a claim that any of these memoranda may be exempt in
part or in whole under 5 UsC § 552(b) (5), we wish to call
your attention to the principle that memoranda containing
recommendations or conclusions that were adopted by the
decision maker are not exempt. See e.g., Renegotiation
Contributions are deductible for U.S. income tac purposes
The NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND is not part of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People although it
was founded by itand shares its commitment to equal rights. LDF has had for over 25 years a separate Board, program, staff, office and budget.
Board v. CGrummon Aircraft, 421 U.S. 168 (1975).
We would appreciate your prompt attention to this
request since as you know the matter is in litigation with
trial scheduled for January 1983.
Sincerely, .,)
\'
INA ALA_
a - pl /
AA INA Le
VLani Guinier
Lowell Johnston
Attorneys
NAACP Legal Defense & Educ.
und, Inc.
cc: Janet Blizard, Director FOIA Office
James Kellogg, Esq.
LG: ja