Order: Unopposed Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limit

Public Court Documents
November 20, 1992

Cite this item
Order: Unopposed Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limit preview

3 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Thompson v. Raiford Hardbacks. Order: Unopposed Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limit, 1992. 0940dc4e-5d40-f011-b4cb-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/70b678e1-8576-4f5a-bbe0-362edb8bae37/order-unopposed-motion-for-leave-to-exceed-page-limit. Accessed June 17, 2025.

    Copied!

    - ® 1/20/72 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

  

LOIS THOMPSON on behalf of and 

as next friend to TAYLOR KEONDRA 
DIXON, ZACHERY X. WILLIAMS, 

CALVIN A. THOMPSON and PRENTISS 

LAVELL MULLINS, 

Plaintiffs, 

VY. Civ. A. No. CA3-92-1539-R 

BURTON F. RAIFORD, in his 

capacity as Commissioner of 
the Texas Department of Human 
Services, 

and 

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendants. 

N
a
 

N
a
a
s
”
 

N
a
s
s
?
 

N
a
t
?
 

N
a
t
l
 

N
a
a
t
?
 
N
t
 

N
a
t
 

N
a
a
t
?
 
N
a
?
 

a
t
?
 

a
t
?
 

a
t
t
?
 

a
t
t
?
 

a
?
 

u
a
?
 

u
t
?
 

u
n
t
 

s
t
?
 

a
t
’
 

s
e
t
 

u
s
t
’
 

  

ORDER 

On the day of , 1992, came on to be heard the   

Unopposed Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limit by defendant United 

States of America ("USA"). The Court, having considered said 

Unopposed Motion and being otherwise fully apprised of the 

circumstances of this cause, is of the opinion that said Unopposed 

Motion should be granted. It is therefore, 

ORDERED that defendant USA's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Exceed 

Page Limit is granted. The Clerk of the Court shall file Defendant 

USA's Opposition to PUEBLO, ABC, NYCCELP and Individual Proposed 

Plaintiff-Intervenors' Motion to Intervene and Memorandum in Support, 

ORDER =-- Page 1 

 



- 4% 

which is attached to defendant USA's Unopposed Motion for Leave to 

  

Exceed Page Limit. 

SIGNED this day of , 1992,   

  
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

ORDER =-- Page 2

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top