Negroes File Job Suit Against Wallace Sewing Company
Press Release
January 27, 1966
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 3. Negroes File Job Suit Against Wallace Sewing Company, 1966. 330be0a7-b692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/72f8c23f-f17f-4028-a35b-68c5ae8cb802/negroes-file-job-suit-against-wallace-sewing-company. Accessed January 07, 2026.
Copied!
10 Columbus Cirele
New York, N.Y. 10019
JUdson 6-8397
NAACP
: Legal Defense and Educational Fund
PRESS RELEASE
President
ion. Francis E. Rivers
pga en FOR RELEASE
Thursday,
January 27, 1966
NEGROES FILE JOB SUIT AGAINST
WALLACE SEWING MACHINE COMPANY
North Carolina Employment Drive Continues
WILMINGTON, N.C.---Attorneys of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund
today filed federal suit against the Wallace Sewing Machine
Company, Wallace, N.C., charging employment discrimination under
the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
Negro plaintiffs are Annie Lois Brown and Doris Ann McGee
of Wallace and Gladys Branch and Annie Dolores Rice of Rose
Hill,&N.C.
a
,
+ Legal Defense Fund attorneys have asked the U.S, District c
Court for the Eastern District for a preliminary and permanent™, ia
injunction restraining the Wallace Company from "maintaining a =
policy, practice, custom and usage of withholding . . . equal.
employment opportunities." $ $
ee
The Legal Defense Fund complaint states that the Wallace
Company maintains an Industrial Training program to train
prospective employees to be sewing machine operators. re
Civil rights attorneys assert the company selects people
from a list drawn up before July 2, 1965. This was the date
the employment section of the Civil Rights Act went into effect.
Hence, the names on the list before that time are all
white, The Negroes applied August 10, 1965.
Fs
The Negroes were denied entry into the training program and
subsequently filed complaints with the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission.
The Commission found "reasonable cause” to believe the
Wallace firm in defiance of Title VII. The sewing concern did
not show evidence of altering its policies within the time
period aliotted,
This cleared the way for today's suit which was filed by
Defense Fund Attorneys J, LeVonne Chambers of Charlotte, N.C.;
and Jack Greenberg, Leroy Clark and Alfred Feinberg, of New York
City.
-30-
Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public ‘ion—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487 So