Letter to Cox from Carraway RE: Jurisdictional Statement Appendix

Correspondence
April 20, 2000

Cite this item

Letter to Cox from Carraway RE: Jurisdictional Statement Appendix preview

2 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Redistricting
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
Case
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 583dd927-e10e-f011-9989-7c1e5267c7b6

Cite this item

Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Letter to Cox from Carraway RE: Jurisdictional Statement Appendix, 2000. 583dd927-e10e-f011-9989-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/730a1372-f49f-4e8e-b7e7-d3329b9cbcb4/letter-to-cox-from-carraway-re-jurisdictional-statement-appendix. Accessed July 30, 2025.

Copied!

    State of North Carolina 
MICHAEL F. EASLEY Department of Justice 

ATTORNEY GENERAL P. O. BOX 629 

RALEIGH REPLY TO: Frances S. Carraway, CLAS 

pe = Special Litigation df DC = 27602-0629 (919) 716-6900 

(919) 716-6763 

April 20, 2000 

Todd A. Cox 

NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund Inc 

1444 1. Street, N.W. 10% Floor 

Washington, DC 20005 

Re: Jurisdictional Statement Appendix in Hunt v. Cromartie 

Dear Toddd: 

I understand you got to go on vacation over the Easter weekend. I’m envious! Hope you had 

a good break before the briefing battle starts! 

Tiare asked me to send you a copy of the documents we have formatted, to date, for the 

jurisdictional statement appendix. We are current through all documents requested. All have not yet 

been proofed, however. The only documents for which page numbers are correct are the opinion and 

dissent. We will hold off on numbering any others until the order is a lot closer to being final. There 

is a separate list of everything included in the packet. 

I haven’t received the copies of your interrogatory responses and admissions yet. Would you 

mind checking to see if they’ve been sent? 

Thanks, and please call if I can help in any way. 

Sincerely, 

Frances S. Carraway, CLAS  



  

pagent” — 

DOCUMENTS TO BE FORMATTED FOR THE JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT 

(don’t number any pages other than the opinion) 

NOTE that captions are omitted - see earlier Jurisdictional Statement) 

Opinion dated March 7, 20000 

Memorandum Opinion - begins on la 

Concurrence and Dissent - should begin on an odd numbered page (we’ll insert a “This 

page left intentionally blank” if needed to make pagination right.) 

Notice of Appeal, March 10, 2000 - 2000app\appeal.not 

Judgment dated March 8, 2000 - from file 

Peterson Trial Testimony - selected portions 

Peterson’s Trial Exhibits - 433 & 434 

Peterson’s 2nd and 3rd (?) Affidavits 

Cooper Trial Testimony - selected portions 

Cooper Affidavit (?) 

McMahan Trial Testimony - selected portions 

McMahan Affidavit (?) 

Cohen Trial Testimony - selected portions 

Selected Interrogatory Responses 

Red Maps - Trial Exhibit Nos. 140-142 

Purple Map from Cooper’s First Affidavit - Trial Exhibit No. 125 

97House/Senate Plan A (as adopted) - Trial Exhibit No. 102A (full state) with stats 

97 Congressional Plan A (Cooper Plan) - Trial Exhibit No. 104B(D1) & C(D12) with stats 

Cooper Plan 2.0 - Trial Exhibit No. 129C(D12) with stats 

Congressional Plan A.1 (McMahan Plan) - Trial Exhibit No. 105B(D1) & C(D12) with stats 

Order in Shaw v. Hunt, dated 9/12/97 

Yo er ve. tnclivilel since whe do's bedi 

Quplicates of +o Size hs bie wsSed: We plat 

ahitnie Jom + [oy an winds filed Page we tha Lyiet 

(C ona Hee exhibits).

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Letter to Cox from Carraway RE: Jurisdictional Statement Appendix

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in