Correspondence from Watson to Clerk Re: United States v. Wilkinson County

Public Court Documents
April 22, 1974

Correspondence from Watson to Clerk Re: United States v. Wilkinson County preview

1 page

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Chisom Hardbacks. Letters from Theresa Haslip to Charles Ralston RE Supreme Court Judgment, 1991. 2c397394-f311-ef11-9f8a-6045bddc4804. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/8b25b108-abdd-4a1c-9fd7-8eb5144f957e/letters-from-theresa-haslip-to-charles-ralston-re-supreme-court-judgment. Accessed August 19, 2025.

    Copied!

    • 
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

OFFICE OF THE CLERK 
WASHINGTON, DC 20543 

WILLIAM K. SUTER, 
CLERK OF THE COURT 

July 22, 1,991 

Charles Stephen Ralston, Esquire 
99 Hudson St. 
16th Floor 
New York, NY 10013 

Re: 90-757 - Chisom, Ronald 
v. Roemer, Gov. of Louisiana 

90-1032 - United States 
v. Roemer, Gov. of Louisiana 

Dear Mr. Ralston: 

AREA CODE 202 
479-3011 

A certified copy of the judgment of this Court in the above-entitled 
cases was mailed today to the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals 
for the Fifth Circuit. 

follows: 
The petitioners are given recovery for cost in this Court as 

Printing of record: 
Clerk's costs: 
Total: 

$1,800.00 
300.00 

$2,100.00 

This amount may be collected through the United States Court of 
Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, or from opposing counsel or parties. 

Very truly yours, 

WILLIAM K. SUTER, Clerk 

By: 

Theresa A. Haslip 
Assistant Clerk 

Enc: 
cc: Robert G. Pugh, Esquire 

Hon. Kenneth W. Starr 
Charles Stephen Ralston, Esquire 
George M. Strickler Jr., Esquire 



aupretne Court of tbe Uniteb ftat 

No. 90-757 and 90-1032 

Ronald Chisom, et al., 

Petitioners, 

V. 

Charles E. Roemer, Governor of Louisiana, et al., and 

United States, 

Petitioner, 

V. 

Charles E. Roemer, Governor of Louisiana, et al. 

ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI to the United States Court of Appeals for the 

Fifth Circuit. 

THESE CAUSES came on to be heard on the transcripts of the records 

from the above court and were argued by counsel. 

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ordered and adjudged by this Court 

that the judgment of the above court in these causes is reversed with costs, 

and that these causes are remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for 

the Fifth Circuit for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of 

this Court. 



S 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioners in No. 90-757, Ronald 

Chisom, et al., recover from Charles E. Roemer, Governor of Louisiana, et al., 

Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00) their costs herein expended; and that the 

petitioner in No. 90-1032, United States, recover from Charles E. Roemer, 

Governor of Louisiana, et al., One Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars ($1,800.00) 

for its costs herein expended. 

June 20, 1991 

Printing of Record: $1,800.00 
Clerk's costs: 300.00 
Total: $2,100.00 



SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 
OFFICE OF THE CLERK 
WASHINGTON, DC 20543 

WILLIAM K. SUTER, AREA CODE 202 
CLERK OF THE COURT 

July 22, 1991 

Charles Stephen Ralston, Esquire 
99 Hudson St. 
16th Floor 
New York, NY 10013 

Re: 90-757 - Chisom, Ronald 
v. Roemer, Gov. of Louisiana 

90-1032 - United States 
v. Roemer, Gov. of Louisiana 

Dear Mr. Ralston: 

479-3011 

A certified copy of the judgment of this Court in the above-entitled 
cases was mailed today to the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals 
for the Fifth Circuit. 

follows: 
The petitioners are given recovery for cost in this Court as 

Printing of record: 
Clerk's costs: 
Total: 

$1,800.00 
300.00 

$2,100.00 

This amount may be collected through the United States Court of 
Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, or from opposing counsel or parties. 

Very truly yours, 

WILLIAM K. SUTER, Clerk 

Theresa A. Haslip 
Assistant Clerk 

Enc: 
cc: Robert G. Pugh, Esquire 

Hon. Kenneth W. Starr 
Charles Stephen Ralston, Esquire 
George M. Strickler Jr., Esquire 



ifoupretne court of tbe ILiniteb 

No. 90-757 and 90-1032 

Ronald Chisom, et al., 

tate5 

Peti,tioners, 

V. 

Charles E. Roemer, Governor of Louisiana, et al., and 

United States, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles E. Roemer, Governor of Louisiana, et al. 

ON WRITS 0F CERTIORARI to the United States Court of Appeals for the 

Fifth Circuit. 

THESE CAUSES came on to be heard on the transcripts of the records 

from the above court and were argued by counsel. 

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ordered and adjudged by this Court 

that the judgment of the above court in these causes is reversed with costs, 

and that these causes are remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for 

the Fifth Circuit for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of 

this Court. 



„ 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioners in No. 90-757, Ronald 

Chisom, et al., recover from Charles E. Roemer, Governor of Louisiana, et al., 

Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00) their costs herein expended., and that the 

petitioner in No. 90-1032, United States, recover from Charles E. Roemer, 

Governor of Louisiana, et al., One Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars ($1,800.00) 

for its costs herein expended. 

Printing of Record: $1,800.00 
Clerk's costs: 300.00 
Total: $2,100.00 

June 20, 1991

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top