Correspondence from Cohen to Hess et al. Re: Court's Appeal for Argument Schedule

Correspondence
November 10, 1998

Cite this item

Correspondence from Cohen to Hess et al. Re: Court's Appeal for Argument Schedule preview

1 page

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Economic Justice
Topic
- Healthcare
Matter
- Campaign to Save Our Public Hospitals - Queens Coalition v. Giuliani
Case
- Campaign to Save Our Public Hospitals - Queens Coalition v. Giuliani
U.S. state
- New York
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 7ccd7aed-6835-f011-8c4e-7c1e5267c7b6

Cite this item

Case Files, Campaign to Save our Public Hospitals v. Giuliani Hardbacks. Correspondence from Cohen to Hess et al. Re: Court's Appeal for Argument Schedule, 1998. 7ccd7aed-6835-f011-8c4e-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/74d053c7-a65d-460b-85a9-47eb3cfbb2fc/correspondence-from-cohen-to-hess-et-al-re-courts-appeal-for-argument-schedule. Accessed October 30, 2025.

Copied!

    Stuart M. Ci Clerk 5 Cfffece 
Clerk of the Count lhany, New York 72207. 1095 

November 10, 1998 

Hon. Michael D. Hess 

Corporation Counsel 
Attn: Flizabeth Dvorkin, Esg. 

100 Church Street, Room 5-240 

New York, New York 10007-2601 

Elaine R. Jones, Esq. 

NAACP Legal Defense & Education 
Fund, Inc. 

Attn: Norman J. Chachkin, Esg. 
99 Hudson Street, 16th Floor 

New York, New York 10013 

Barbara J. Olshansky, Esg. 
Center for Constitutional Rights 
666 Broadway, 7th Floor 
New York, New York 10002 

Re: Campaign To Save Our Public Hospitals v. Giuliani 

Dear ‘Counselors: 

The Court has scheduled this appeal for argument on Tuesday, 
February 16, 19%8 at 2:00 p.m. 

Appellants-respondents' response to the cross appeal and 
reply on the main appeal is due by December 23, 1998. 
Respondents-appellants' reply on the cross appeal is due by 
January 3, '1299. "All briefs must actually be with opposing 
counsel and filed at the Court by the above stated dates. Please 
be aware that these dates are final and under the Court Rules 
failure to comply with the filing dates may subject the 
appellants-respondents to dismissal (Rule 500.9([b]) and the 
respondents-appellants to preclusion (Rule 500.9]([c]). 

Questions may be directed to Martin F. Strnad at (518) 455- 
7702, 

Very truly yours, 

£4 

{ 

Stuart M. Cohen 

mec

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Correspondence from Cohen to Hess et al. Re: Court's Appeal for Argument Schedule

Impact area

Topic

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in