Wellington Hereford v. Huntsville Board of Education Decision
Public Court Documents
October 8, 1971
Cite this item
-
Brief Collection, LDF Court Filings. Wellington Hereford v. Huntsville Board of Education Decision, 1971. 3348e41d-b89a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/7633fbf6-6879-459d-990a-8dfc8b4b89a6/wellington-hereford-v-huntsville-board-of-education-decision. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
IN THE
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
N o . 7 1 - 2 6 4 1
SONNIE W ELLINGTON H EREFO RD , IV, E T AL,
P laintiffs-A ppellants,
UNITED ST A T E S O F AM ERICA,
Plaintiff-Intervenor,
versus
H U N TSV ILLE BOARD O F EDUCATION, E T AL,
D efendants-A ppellees.
Appeal from the United S ta tes D istrict Court for the
Northern D istrict of A labam a
(October 8, 1971)
Before B E L L , AINSWORTH, and GODBOLD,
Circuit Judges.
P E R CURIAM: We find no error in the judgm ent
of the district court which form s the subject m atter
of this appeal. It follows that the judgm ent should be
and it is A FFIR M ED .
Adm. Office. U.S. Courts—Scofields’ Quality Printers, Inc., N. O., La.
IN THE
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
N o . 7 1 - 2 6 4 1
SO N NIE W ELLIN GTON H EREFO RD , IV, E T AL,
P laintiff s-A ppellants,
UNITED ST A T E S O F AM ERICA,
Plaintiff-Intervenor,
versus
H U N TSV ILLE BO ARD O F EDUCATION, E T AL,
D efendants-A ppellees.
Appeal from the United S ta tes D istrict Court for the
Northern D istrict of A labam a
(October 8, 1971)
Before B E L L , AINSWORTH, and GODBOLD,
Circuit Judges.
P E R CURIAM: We find no error in the judgm ent
of the district court which form s the subject m atter
of this appeal. It follows that the judgm ent should be
and it is A FFIR M ED .
Adm. Office, U.S. Courts—Scofields’ Quality Printers, Inc., N. O., La.
IN THE
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
N o . 7 1 - 2 6 4 1
SO N NIE W ELLIN GTON H EREFO RD , IV, E T AL,
P laintiffs-A ppellants,
UNITED ST A T E S O F AM ERICA,
Plaintiff-Intervenor,
versus
H U N TSV ILLE BOARD O F EDUCATION, ET AL,
D efendants-A ppellees.
Appeal from the United S ta tes D istrict Court for the
Northern D istrict of A labam a
(October 8, 1971)
Before B E L L , AINSWORTH, and GODBOLD,
Circuit Judges.
P E R CURIAM: We find no error in the judgm ent
of the district court which form s the subject m atter
of this appeal. It follows that the judgm ent should be
and it is A FFIR M ED .
Adm. Office, U.S. Courts—Scofields’ Quality Printers, Inc., N. O., La.