Plaintiffs' Response to Houston Lawyer's Association Motion to Intervene
Public Court Documents
February 2, 1989
4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Plaintiffs' Response to Houston Lawyer's Association Motion to Intervene, 1989. e32193f8-1e7c-f011-b4cc-6045bdffa665. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/76954fea-955a-468c-88ea-20fcea67db93/plaintiffs-response-to-houston-lawyers-association-motion-to-intervene. Accessed November 07, 2025.
Copied!
GARRETT, THOMPSON & CHANG
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT Liaw
8300 DouGLAS AVENUE
Suite 800
PrEsTON CENTER
DavLrLas. TExas 75225
WILLIAM L. GARRETT. P.C.
BRENDA HULL THOMPSON. P.C.
SUE J. CHANG. PC.
214-369-1952
214-363-1022
214-987-9887
February 2, 1989
U. .S. District Clerk
200 FE. Vall
Midland, TX 79702
Re: MO 88 CA 154
LULAC, et al. v. Mattox, et al.
Dear Clerk:
Enclosed for filing please find the original and one copy
of Plaintiffs' Response to Houston Lawyer's Association Motion
to Intervene,
By copy of this letter, a copy of the response is being
furnished to all counsel of record.
—
rr ie i TT
’” Aol vd qT —
Yours truly, }
/ / fon ony
/ A : / ™\ [fy Lo den
LY / «7 es ’ 4
Sls
: William L. Garrett
cc: NAACP Legal Defense &«
Education fund, Inc.
Gabrielle K. McDonald
Renea Hicks
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION
LULAC, ET Al.
Plaintiffs
VS
CIVIL ACTION NO.
JIM MATTOX, ET AL.
MO-88-CA-154
N
a
e
”
Na
st
”
Na
st
”
a
s
t
?
Sa
t?
”
a
n
a
t
?
a
t
’
“v
an
e?
na
t?
“
e
t
?
”
Defendants
PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO HOUSTON LAWYER'S ASSOCIATION
MOTION TO INTERVENE
Plaintiffs, LULAC, ET aAl., do. not oppose Houston lawyer's
Association Plaintiffs Motion to Intervene.
Permissive Intervention. Houston Lawyer's Association has
sought permissive intervention under Rule 24h) 12). Such
intervention ‘is wholly discretionary with the district court.
New Orleans Public Service, supra, at 470-471. In deciding upon
whether to grant a permissive intervention, a district court
should look at (1) whether the intervenor's interests are
adequately represented by other parties, and (2) whether they
will significantly contribute to full development of the
underlying factual issues in the suit. New Orleans Public
Service, supra, at 472.
Houston Lawyer's Association request meets these
requirements. The participation of the NAACP Legal Defense and
PLAINTIFFS! RESPONSE TO MOTION TO INTERVENE - PAGE 1 27/r-m-inv.ok
Education Fund, Inc. was sought by the original plaintiffs
herein for the purpose of assembling the data and assisting with
the proof of the Harris County part of the litigation. Lawyers
for that organization have spent subtantial time and resources
gathering and analyzing that data. Theiy participation ‘will
enable original plaintiffs to spend their limited resources on
other parts of the litigation.
In the alternative, in the event that the Court should
determine that intervention 1s not proper, the original
plaintiffs would request that the lawyers for the NAACP Legal
Defense and Education Fund, Inc. and Hon. Gabrielle K. MacDonald
be entered as additional attorneys of record for the black
plaintiffs herein.
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs respectfully request
this Court to GRANT Houston Lawyer's Association Pliantiffs
Motion to Intervene.
Respectfully submitted,
GARRETT, THOMPSON & CHANG
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
A Partnership of
Professional Corporations
8300 Douglas, Suite 800
Dallas, TX 75225
214/ 369-1952
ROLANDO L. RIOS
ATTORNEY AT LAW
SOUTHWEST VOTER REGISTRATION &
EDUCATION PROJECT
201 N.. St. Mary's, Suite 521
San Antonio, TX 78205
512/ 222-2102
PILAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO MOTION TO INTERVENE - PAGE 2 27/r-m~inv,.ok
SUSAN FINKELSTEIN
TEXAS RURAL LEGAL AID, INC.
201 N. St. Mary's, Suite 600
San Antonio, TX 78205
512/ 222-2478.
5,
By: “ Z, \Z= i pe —
WILLIAM L. GAPRETT 07700000
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
i Nc
ail J
certify that on this L day of February, 1989, I served
the foregoing document on all attorneys of record, certified
mail, return receipt requested. 7 per
2 fo fa gt” yi
4 7 y : {5 Pn Ltn). ms 7
pe I GY am BT
“——fiilliam-Ls Garrett =e
PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO MOTION TO INTERVENE - PAGE 3 27/r-m—inv.ok