Defense's Motion for Extension of Time
Public Court Documents
September 25, 1981
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Defense's Motion for Extension of Time, 1981. 31d79b77-d292-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/7a4f4941-28ef-452b-b7e0-e8c03fa0b8f6/defenses-motion-for-extension-of-time. Accessed November 30, 2025.
Copied!
IN
FOR THE
RALPH GINGLES, SIPPI
BELFIELD and JOSEPH
behalf of themselves
others similarly sit
Plai
v.
RUFUS EDMISTEN, in h
as the Attorney Gene
Carolina; JAMES C. G
Governor of North Ca
capacity as Presiden
Carolina Senate; LIS
in his capacity as S
North Carolina House
tatives; THE STATE B
ELECTIONS OF NORTH C
R. KENNETH BABB, JOH
SR., RUTH SEMASHKO,
BARNWELL and SHIRLEY
their official capac
members of the State
Elections of North C
THAD EURE, in his ca
Secretary of the Fta
Carolina,
Defe
The defendants i
Extension OF Time in
Complaint in the abo
they be granted a pe
or until November 6,
to the Complaint.
The undersigned
attorney for plainti
objection to defenda
as said Extension in
usual discovery sche
Extension of Time;
WHEREFORE,it is
granted an additiona
or until November 6,
pleadings.
V 28"" 8|
THE UNITED'STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ii;
RALEIGH DIVISION
i“‘:;r“'
O BURTON, FRED CIVIL ACTION
MOODY, on NO. 81-803~CIV~5
and all
uated,
ntiffs,
MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME
is capacity
ral of North
REEN, Lt.
rolina in his
t of the North
TON B. RAMSEY
beaker of the
of Represen-
DARD OF
AROLINA:
N L. STICKLEY,
SYDNEY F. C.
HERRING, in
ities as
Board of
arolina;
pacity as
te of North
and
VVVVvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvVV
ndants.
n the above—entitled action move for an
which to file responsive pleadings to the
Je—entitled action; the defendants move that
riod of thirty days beyond October 7, 1981
1981 in which to file responsive pleadings
:ounsel has conferred with Leslie Winner,
Efs, who has indicated that she has no
nts Motion for Extension of Time so long
.I.
\-
no way interferes with what would be he
Rule in the absence of an Order granting an
defendants stipulate to this condition.
:espectfully prayed that the defendants be
1981,
L thirty days, following October 7,
1981, in which to file their responsive
MJH
» K
.flh
This the
./
day of September, 1981.
Rufus L. Edmisten
Attorney General
\‘ /
James WEIIace,VJr. L&//r'
Deputy Attorney Gener 1
for Legal Affairs
North Carolina Attorney
~’”General's Office
Post Office Box 629
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Telephone: (919) 733—3377
Tiare Smiley
Norma Harrell
Assistant Attorneys General
I hereby certify
Motion for Extension
placing a copy of sa
postage prepaid, add
This the ;% ) d
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
that I have this day served the foregoing
of Time upon p1aintiffs' attorneys by '
id Motion in the United States Post Office,
ressed to:
J. Levonne Chambers
Chambers, Ferguson, Watt, Uallas,
Adkins & Fuller, P.A.
951 South Independence Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Leslie Winner ‘
Chambers, Ferguson, Watt, Wallas,
Adkins & Fuller, P.A.
951 South Independence Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Jack Greenberg
James M. Nabrit, III
Napoleon B. Williams, Jr.
10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York 10019
ay of September, 1981
av": . ,/ I.
. fl 1, //' .V
"” ;.Qn~.fgz/
4%.,“ .. ”27/, K C.
James Wallace, Jr. .7
IN'H
FOR THE
RALPH GINGLES, et. a
V.
RUFUS L.
EDMISTEN, e
FOR GOOD CAUSE 8
action are hereby gr
responsive pleadings
they being granted a
1981, or until Novem
pleadings.
This the da
E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EAFTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
RALEIGH DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION
1. ) NO. 81—803—CIV—5
)
) ORDER
)
t. al. )
HOWN, the defendants in the above—entitled
anted an extension of time in which to file
to the Complaint filed in said matter,
n additional thirty days, following October 7,
her 6, 1981, in which to file their responsive
y of September, 1981.
J. Rich Leonard
Clerk of Court
Eastern District of North Carolina
United States District Court
Deputy Clerk