Defense's Motion for Extension of Time
Public Court Documents
September 25, 1981

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Defense's Motion for Extension of Time, 1981. 31d79b77-d292-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/7a4f4941-28ef-452b-b7e0-e8c03fa0b8f6/defenses-motion-for-extension-of-time. Accessed June 13, 2025.
Copied!
IN FOR THE RALPH GINGLES, SIPPI BELFIELD and JOSEPH behalf of themselves others similarly sit Plai v. RUFUS EDMISTEN, in h as the Attorney Gene Carolina; JAMES C. G Governor of North Ca capacity as Presiden Carolina Senate; LIS in his capacity as S North Carolina House tatives; THE STATE B ELECTIONS OF NORTH C R. KENNETH BABB, JOH SR., RUTH SEMASHKO, BARNWELL and SHIRLEY their official capac members of the State Elections of North C THAD EURE, in his ca Secretary of the Fta Carolina, Defe The defendants i Extension OF Time in Complaint in the abo they be granted a pe or until November 6, to the Complaint. The undersigned attorney for plainti objection to defenda as said Extension in usual discovery sche Extension of Time; WHEREFORE,it is granted an additiona or until November 6, pleadings. V 28"" 8| THE UNITED'STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ii; RALEIGH DIVISION i“‘:;r“' O BURTON, FRED CIVIL ACTION MOODY, on NO. 81-803~CIV~5 and all uated, ntiffs, MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME is capacity ral of North REEN, Lt. rolina in his t of the North TON B. RAMSEY beaker of the of Represen- DARD OF AROLINA: N L. STICKLEY, SYDNEY F. C. HERRING, in ities as Board of arolina; pacity as te of North and VVVVvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvVV ndants. n the above—entitled action move for an which to file responsive pleadings to the Je—entitled action; the defendants move that riod of thirty days beyond October 7, 1981 1981 in which to file responsive pleadings :ounsel has conferred with Leslie Winner, Efs, who has indicated that she has no nts Motion for Extension of Time so long .I. \- no way interferes with what would be he Rule in the absence of an Order granting an defendants stipulate to this condition. :espectfully prayed that the defendants be 1981, L thirty days, following October 7, 1981, in which to file their responsive MJH » K .flh This the ./ day of September, 1981. Rufus L. Edmisten Attorney General \‘ / James WEIIace,VJr. L&//r' Deputy Attorney Gener 1 for Legal Affairs North Carolina Attorney ~’”General's Office Post Office Box 629 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Telephone: (919) 733—3377 Tiare Smiley Norma Harrell Assistant Attorneys General I hereby certify Motion for Extension placing a copy of sa postage prepaid, add This the ;% ) d CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE that I have this day served the foregoing of Time upon p1aintiffs' attorneys by ' id Motion in the United States Post Office, ressed to: J. Levonne Chambers Chambers, Ferguson, Watt, Uallas, Adkins & Fuller, P.A. 951 South Independence Boulevard Charlotte, North Carolina 28202 Leslie Winner ‘ Chambers, Ferguson, Watt, Wallas, Adkins & Fuller, P.A. 951 South Independence Boulevard Charlotte, North Carolina 28202 Jack Greenberg James M. Nabrit, III Napoleon B. Williams, Jr. 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 ay of September, 1981 av": . ,/ I. . fl 1, //' .V "” ;.Qn~.fgz/ 4%.,“ .. ”27/, K C. James Wallace, Jr. .7 IN'H FOR THE RALPH GINGLES, et. a V. RUFUS L. EDMISTEN, e FOR GOOD CAUSE 8 action are hereby gr responsive pleadings they being granted a 1981, or until Novem pleadings. This the da E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EAFTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA RALEIGH DIVISION CIVIL ACTION 1. ) NO. 81—803—CIV—5 ) ) ORDER ) t. al. ) HOWN, the defendants in the above—entitled anted an extension of time in which to file to the Complaint filed in said matter, n additional thirty days, following October 7, her 6, 1981, in which to file their responsive y of September, 1981. J. Rich Leonard Clerk of Court Eastern District of North Carolina United States District Court Deputy Clerk