Motion for a Protective Order; Protective Order

Public Court Documents
January 1, 1984

Cite this item
Motion for a Protective Order; Protective Order preview

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Major v. Treen Hardbacks. Motion for a Protective Order; Protective Order, 1984. c3c8ed80-c903-ef11-a1fd-00224822c302. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/7ae43ea3-abb5-4f2f-bdff-3a3a75ca5fd2/motion-for-a-protective-order-protective-order. Accessed November 05, 2025.

    Copied!

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 

BARBARA MAJOR, ET AL 

Plaintiffs CIViL ACTION 

versus NO. 82-1192 

DAVID C. TREEN, BTC., BRT AL SECTION. C 

Defendants 

* 
0%

 
OF
 

Fk
 

HF
 

¥ 
F 

* 
* 

HF
 

k % kk kkk fe ok hk hk hk Kk fk kh fk * %* *% 

MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER 
  

Defendants, Treen, et al, move this Court to grant 

a protective order quashing the deposition by plaintiffs of under- 

signed counsel for the reasons discussed in the attached memoran- 

dum. 

Respectfully submitted, 

WILLIAM J. GUSTE, JR. 
ATTORNEY GENERAL 

KENDALL L. VICK 
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL 

ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENE 
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 
234 LOYOLA AVENUE, 7TH FLOOR 
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70112 
PHONE: (504) 568-5575  



IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 

BARBARA MAJOR, ET AL 

Plaintiffs CIVIL ACTION 

versus NO, 82-1192 

DAVID C. TREEN, ETC., ET AL SECTION C 

Defendants 

* 
HF

 
F 

* 
¥ 

* 
* 

* 
* 

* 

* kok ok fk hk fk fk ft kh % Rh hh %°% 

Con'sidering the foregoing Motion for a Protective Order 

and Memorandum in Support thereof, it is hereby ordered that 

the notice of deposition seeking to depose defendants or their 

agents, servants or employees who are most knowledgeable with 

regard to the objections and contentions of the defendants relat- 

ing to plaintiffs' motion for an award of attorneys' fees and 

expenses previously filed in this action, particularly relating 

to those factors enumerated in Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, 
  

488 ¥.2d 714 (5th Cir. 1974), is hereby quashed. Plaintiffs 

are further prohibited from directing any discovery to defendants 

as to the same issues. 

    

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.