Plaintiff-Intervenors Houston Lawyers First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents to Defendants
Public Court Documents
May 8, 1989
9 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Plaintiff-Intervenors Houston Lawyers First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents to Defendants, 1989. b9f5e85c-237c-f011-b4cc-6045bdffa665. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/7bcef2a2-ef68-4eaf-a0d5-3be7d614ab0e/plaintiff-intervenors-houston-lawyers-first-set-of-interrogatories-and-requests-for-production-of-documents-to-defendants. Accessed December 23, 2025.
Copied!
May 8, 1989
Renea Hicks, Esq.
Javier Guajardo, Esq.
Attorney General’s Office
P.O. BOX 12548
Austin, TX 78711
Re: IUILAC, et al, v. Mattox. et al.
Dear Counsel:
Enclosed please find Plaintiff-Intervenors Houston Lawyers’
Association’s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for
Production of Documents to defendants in the above captioned
case. All counsel of record have been served.
I look forward to your timely response.
yn A. Ifill
1 for Plaintiff-Intervenors
NINETY NINE HUDSON STREET, 16th FLOOR ° (212) 219-1900 ° NEW YORK, N.Y. 10013
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS,
(LULAC), et al.,
PLAINTIFF,
Houston Lawyers’ Association, Alice Bonner,
Weldon Berry, Francis Williams, Rev. William.
Lawson, Deloyd T. Parker, Bennie McGinty,
Plaintiff-Intervenors
Vv. 3 ; No. MO-88-CA-154
JAMES MATTOX, Attorney General of
the State of Texas, et al.,
DEFENDANTS.
PLAINTIFF-INTERVENORS HOUSTON LAWYERS’ ASSOCIATION'S
FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANTS
Pursuant to Rules 33 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, plaintiffs request that defendants answer fully in
writing and under oath each of the following interrogatories
within 15 days after service. These interrogatories shall be
deemed continuing to the extent required by Fed. R. Civ. 26(e).
In answering each interrogatory, defendants are requested to
identify separately and in a manner suitable for use in a
subpoena all sources of information (whether human, documentary,
or other) and all records maintained by the defendants or by any
other person or organization on which the defendants relied in
answering the interrogatories.
For each request to produce, plaintiffs request that
defendants produce all requested documents at the law office of
Gabrielle K. McDonald, 301 Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas, 78701,
within 15 days after service or at such time and place as is
mutually agreed upon by counsel for the parties.
Definitions
1. “Identify” when referring to a fact or document, means state
the name and date of the fact or document, the type of document,
the identity of the author of the document, and the location of
the document or a copy of the document.
2. ”"Identify,” when referring to a person, means state the name,
race, home and business address and position with any defendant
or relation to any defendant, if any. |
3. “Document” means ‘the original or identical copy of any
document (including "writings, drawings, graphs, charts,
photographs, phonorecords, audio recordings, and other data
compilations from which information can be obtained, translated,
if necessary, by the plaintiffs through detection services into
reasonably usable form) and any tangible things which constitute
or contain matters within the scope of Rule 26(b) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure. ;
4. “Relating to” a subject means containing, embodying,
referring to, comprising, reflecting, explaining, or having a
logical, factual or causal connection with the subject.
5. “The Voting Rights Act” means the Voting Rights Act of 1965,
as amended, 42. U.S.C. §1973, et seq.
Interrogatories and Requests to Produce
INTERROGATORY NO. 1: Identify each expert you have consulted in
preparation for the trial of this matter. For each, give the
subject matter on which the expert was consulted.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 1: Please produce for inspection and
copying all documents you have directly or indirectly provided to
or prepared for, each expert listed in response to Interrogatory
No. 1, and any documents prepared by each expert for the use of
the defendants in this case, or which relates to the claims or
defenses of defendant-intervenor Wood.
INTERROGATORY NO. 2: Identify how many residents of Harris
County were registered to vote during each of the following
years: 1940, 1950, 1960, 1964, 1968, 1972, 1976, 1980, 1982,
1984, 1986, 1988.
INTERROGATORY NO. 3: For each year listed above, identify how
many registered voters were white, how many were Black, how many
were Hispanic, and how many were any other race.
INTERROGATORY NO. 4: Fully describe the requirements for
registering to vote in the .state of Texas including any
qualifications, tests, taxes or other prerequisites to
registration during each of the following years: 1940, 1950,
1960, 1964, 1968, 1972, 1976, 1980, 1982, 1984, 1986, and 1988,
and cite the statutory or wedtiten authorities upon which your
descriptions are. based.
INTERROGATORY NO. 5: Identify every civil action, (indicating
case name, civil action number and citation) filed since 1950
against the State of Texas, any agency, department or appointed
body of the State of Texas or any county, municipality or
township in Texas, which alleged discrimination on the basis of
race, a denial of equal protection to Black residents, or a
violation of any statute which protects or protected civil
rights, including but not limited to the right to vote. Include
any action claiming discrimination in. employment or in the
provision of state or municipal services.
INTERROGATORY NO. 6: Identify every instance in which the U.S.
Department of Justice, the United States Department of Health,
Education and Welfare, the U.S. Department of Health & Human
Services, the United States Department of Education or any other
federal agency or department has investigated any claim, charge
or suspicion of racial discrimination against Blacks in Texas
since 1950.
INTERROGATORY NO. 7: Identify and fully describe each and every
state policy or rationale which you contend supports the adoption
or maintenance of the currently constituted at large system of
electing district judges in Texas.
INTERROGATORY NO. 8: Identify and fully describe the reasons why
defendants contend Article 5, §7a(i) of the Texas Constitution
was adopted.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 3: Please provide for inspection and
copying any documents which support your answer to Interrogatory
No. 8, or on which you base your answer to Interrogatory No. 8.
INTERROGATORY NO. 9: State whether you have prepared, or have
had prepared, any analysis of past and/or current voting
practices of any ethnically or racially identifiable group of
voters in Texas for the purpose of attempting to determine
whether racially polarized voting has occurred, or continues to
occur, in the State.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 4: If your answer to Interrogatory
No. 9 is yes, please produce all documents which indicate the
results of the analysis.
INTERROGATORY NO. 10: Describe fully the specialized functions
of district judges in Harris County, including, but not limited
to: the types of specialized district judges (i.e, criminal,
civil, juvenile); the qualifications necessary for each type of
specialized judge; the number of judges currently serving in each
specialized area, their names, and the number of the district in
which they serve.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 5: Please produce for inspection and
copying all documents . on which you base your answer to
Interrogatory No. 10.
INTERROGATORY NO. 11: State whether the State of Texas, Harris
County or any of their subdivisions, offices or personnel, have
kept or currently keep information related to the race of
registered voters, or the racial composition of election
precincts in Texas in general, and/or in Harris County in
® specific.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 6: Please produce for inspection and
copying all documents on which you base your answer to
Interrogatory No. 11. o
ecrully submitted,
A. Sp
dn LIUS bd GAMBIT
SHERRILYN A. IFILL
NAACP Legal Defense &
Educational Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson Street, 16th Floor
New York, New York 10013
(212) 219-1900
Of Counsel:
Matthews & Branscomb
A Professional Corporation
May Y, 1989
GABRIELLE K. MCDONALD
301 Congress Avenue
Suite 2050
Austin, Texas 78701
(512) 320-5055
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenors
Houston Lawyers’ Association,
et al.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this xe day of May, 1989, a true
and correct copy of the foregoing Plaintiff-Intervenors Houston
Lawyers’ Association’s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests
For Production to Defendants was mailed to counsel of record in
this case by first class United States mail, postage pre-paid, as
follows:
William L. Garrett
Brenda Hull Thompson
Garrett, Thompson & Chang
8300 Douglas, Suite 800
Dallas, TX 75225
Rolando L. Rios
Southwest Voter Registration
Education Project
201 N. St. Mary’s, Suite 521
San Antonio, TX 78205
Susan Finkelstein
Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc.
201 N. St. Mary’s, Suite 521
San Antonio, TX 78205
Edward B. Cloutman, III
Mullinax, Wells, Baab &
Cloutman, P.C.
3301 Elm
Dallas, TX 75226-9222
Jim Mattox
Mary F. Keller
Renea Hicks
Javier Guajardo
Attorney General’s Office
P.O. Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711
J. Eugene Clements
John E. 0’Neill
Evelyn V. Keys
Porter & Clements
700 Louisiana, Suite 3500
Houston, TX 77002-2730
Michael J. Wood
Attorney at Law
440 Louisiana, Suite 200
Houston, TX 77002
Ken Oden
Travis County Attorney
P.O. BOW 1748
Austin, TX 78767
David R. Richards
Special Counsel
600 W. 7th St.
Austin, TX 78701
Robert H. Mow, Jr.
Hughes & Luce
2800 Momentum Place
1717 Main Street
Dallas, TX 75201
-
Hl
Spee a. Ifil1 Vv
Attorney for Plaintiff- ~IAtervencrs
Houstorp Lawyers’ Association