Letter to Opposing Counsel From Smiley RE: Appellants’ Designation of Documents For Joint Appendix

Correspondence
October 9, 1998

Cite this item

Letter to Opposing Counsel From Smiley RE: Appellants’ Designation of Documents For Joint Appendix preview

3 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Redistricting
Matter
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
Case
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 76a730ca-e00e-f011-9989-002248226c06

Cite this item

Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Letter to Opposing Counsel From Smiley RE: Appellants’ Designation of Documents For Joint Appendix, 1998. 76a730ca-e00e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/7bddee68-da25-42f3-8696-aaa77ae6d30b/letter-to-opposing-counsel-from-smiley-re-appellants-designation-of-documents-for-joint-appendix. Accessed November 19, 2025.

Copied!

    State of North Carolina 

MICHAEL F. EASLEY Department of Justice 
ATTORNEY GENERAL P.O. BOX 629 : ; 

REPLY TO: Tiare B. Smiley 
RALEIGH Special Litigation 

27602-0629 (919) 716-6900 
FAX: (919) 716-6763 

October 9, 1998 

Mr. Robinson O. Everett 

Everett & Everett 

P. O. Box 586 

Durham, NC 27702 

Re: Designation of Cromartie Joint Appendix 

Dear Robinson: 

Pursuant to the Supreme Court Rules, enclosed please find appellants’ designation of 
documents from the district court record for the Joint Appendix in the Cromartie appeal. The 
designation includes documents reproduced in the Appendix to the Jurisdictional Statement, which 
will not be reproduced in the Joint Appendix. 

As per our conversation, we will work with your co-counsel Martin McGee regarding 
appellees’ designations for the Joint Appendix. 

Very truly yours, 

Tiare B. Smiley 

Special Deputy Attorney Gener 

TBS/fc 

Enclosure 

CC: Martin McGee 

Todd Cox 

Adam Stein 

Clerk, United States Supreme Court (w/out enclosure) 

 



LJ » 

APPELLANTS’ DESIGNATIONS FOR THE JOINT APPENDIX 

IN HUNT V. CROMARTIE, NO. 98-85 

  

, Docket Entries 

iy Amended Complaint (CD* 21) 

3. Answer (CD 26) 

4. Answer of Defendant-Intervenor (CD 27 & 112) 

5. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (CD 34) 

6. Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (CD 44) 

7. Affidavit of Gary O. Bartlett (CD 46) - Selected Portions and Attachments from the 
Section 5 Submission: 

a. Section 97C-27N - Effect of Change on Minority Voters (as reproduced in the 
Jurisdictional Statement Appendix) 

; Section 97C-27R - Other Material Concerning the Purpose of the Plan 
C. Attachment 97C-27A-2, 97 House/Senate Plan A Stat Pack, pp. 25-28: 

1. District Summary - Total Populations 

ii. District Summary - Voting Age Populations 

iii. District Summary - Registration 

iv. District Summary - Elections 
d. Attachment 97C-27B-1, 1992 Congressional Base Plan #10 - 

Explanation/Statistics: 

i. District Summary - Total Populations 

ii. District Summary - Voting Age Populations 

iii. District Summary - Registration 
c. Attachment 97C-28F-4F (1), Statement of Senator Roy Cooper, House 

Congressional Redistricting Committee Discussion House Floor 3-26-97, pp. 1-4 
f Attachment 97C-28F-4F(2), Statement of Representative Edwin McMahan, 

Verbatim Transcript of Floor Debate on HB 586 (Committee Substitute) 
Congressional Redistricting Senate Chamber Thursday, March 27, 1997, pp. 1-8 

8. Affidavit of Senator Roy A. Cooper, III (without attachments) (CD 47) (as reproduced 
in the Jurisdictional Statement Appendix) 

FADATA\WP\SPLIT\DISTRICT\CROMARTI\USSCT\JAPPDESI.LST page 1 

 



9, Affidavit of Representative W. Edwin McMahan (without attachment) (CD 47) (as 
reproduced in the Jurisdictional Statement Appendix) 

  

10. Affidavit of David W. Peterson, PhD (without attachment) (CD 47) (as reproduced in 
the Jurisdictional Statement Appendix) 

11. Affidavit of Dr. Alfred W. Stuart (without attachments) (CD 47) (as reproduced in the 
Jurisdictional Statement Appendix) 

12. “An Evaluation of North Carolina’s 1998 Congressional Districts” by Professor Gerald 
R. Webster (without maps) (CD 47) (as reproduced in the Jurisdictional Statement 
Appendix) 

13. Order and Permanent Injunction of United States District Court for the Eastern District of 
North Carolina, April 3, 1998 (CD 70) (as reproduced in the Jurisdictional Statement 
Appendix) 

14. Judgment of United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, April 
6, 1998 (CD 71) (as reproduced in the Jurisdictional Statement Appendix) A 

15. Notice of Appeal, April 6, 1998 (CD 74) (as reproduced in the Jurisdictional 
Statement Appendix) 

16. Amended Notice of Appeal, April 8, 1998 (CD 77) (as reproduced in the Jurisdictional 
Statement Appendix) 

17. Opinions of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, April 14, 
1998 (CD 79) (as reproduced in the Jurisdictional Statement Appendix) 

18. Order of United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, April 21, 
1998 (CD 88) (as reproduced in the Jurisdictional Statement Appendix) 

19. Order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, June 
22,1998 (CD 112) (as reproduced in the Jurisdictional Statement Appendix) 

* CD = Civil Docket Number 

F\DATA\WP\SPLIT\DISTRICT\CROMARTI\USSCT\JAPPDESI.LST page 2

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Letter to Opposing Counsel From Smiley RE: Appellants’ Designation of Documents For Joint Appendix

Impact area

Topic

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in