Motion for Extension of Time

Public Court Documents
October 15, 1992

Motion for Extension of Time preview

4 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Motion for Extension of Time, 1992. 04b33cee-a346-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/7e34cad8-1730-4821-afcd-3ebf3d1281f4/motion-for-extension-of-time. Accessed October 09, 2025.

    Copied!

    CV 89-03609775 

MILO SHEFF, et al., : SUPERIOR COURT 

Plaintiffs, : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF 

: HARTFORD/NEW BRITAIN 

Vv. : AT HARTFORD 

WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, et al., 

Defendants. : OCTOBER 15, 1992 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 
  

The defendants move for an extension of time of ten days, up 

to and including October 25, 1992 in which to respond or object 

to the plaintiffs' Fifth Request for Production of Documents. 

The defendants request this additional time because a 

substantial portion of the documents requested by the plaintiffs 

(i.e., in response to items 5, 6,7, and 8) will not be available 

from the State Department of Education until sometime within the 

ten (10) day period following this motion. 

NO ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED 
NO TESTIMONY REQUIRED   

  

  
  

 



  

  

    

Moreover, despite the tremendous amount of time and best efforts 

of the many individuals being put to the task of gathering, 

copying and indexing these materials, the defendants cannot 

produce the documents requested in the plaintiffs’ Fifth Request 

for Production of Documents within the thrity (30) days provided 

for by the Connecticut Practice Book. 

This is the defendants' first request for an extension of 

time within which to respond or object to the plaintiffs' Fifth 

Request for Production of Documents. Counsel for the plaintiffs 

object to this motion to the extent that it may delay production 

of the documents requested in items 5, 6, 7, and 8. Counsel for 

the plaintiffs consent to this motion in all other respects. 

FOR THE DEFENDANTS 

RICHARD BLUMENTHAL 

By: 
   

a, tha M. x - £71 

Agsistant Attorney General 
110 Sherman Street 

/Hartford, Connecticut 06105 
f tel, 566-7173 

  

  

   

  

  
 



  

ORDER 

For a good cause shown, the foregoing motion is hereby 

  

    

GRANTED/DENIED. 

This is to certify that on this 15th day of October, 

By the Court, 

  

Honorable Harry Hammer 

CERTIFICATION 
  

1992 a 

copy of the foregoing was mailed to the following counsel of 

record: 

John Brittain, Esq. 
University of Connecticut 
School of Law 
65 Elizabeth Street 

Wilfred Rodriguez, Esq. 
Hispanic Advocacy Project 
Neighborhood Legal Services 
1229 Albany Avenue 

Hartford, CT 06105 Hartford, . CT 06112 

Philip Tegeler, Esq. Wesley W. Horton, Esq. 
Martha Stone, Esq. Moller, Horton & 

Connecticut Civil Fineberg, P.C. 
- Liberties Union 90 Gillett Street 

32 Grand Street Hartford, Cr 06105 
Hartford, CT "06105 

Ruben Franco, Esq. Julius L. Chambers, Esq. 

Jenny Rivera, Esq. Marianne Lado, Esq. 

Puerto Rican Legal Defense Ronald Ellis, Esq. 
and Education Fund NAACP Legal Defense Fund and 
99 Hudson Street Education Fund, Inc. 
14th Floor 99 Hudson Street 

New York, NY 10013 New York, NY 10013 

  

  

 



  

  

John A. Powell, Esq. 
Helen Hershkoff, Esq. 

Adam S. Cohen, Esq. 
American Civil Liberties Union 

132 West 43rd Street 

New York, NY 10036 

      

fartha M. Watts 
Assistant Zotomney General 

MMWO1 78AC

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.