Fact Sheet on Seven Protest Demonstration Cases Decided by the U.S. Supreme Court
Press Release
May 20, 1963
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Loose Pages. Fact Sheet on Seven Protest Demonstration Cases Decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, 1963. 51aa673c-bd92-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/81c54588-1bf5-4b8f-8490-2d0a00de4280/fact-sheet-on-seven-protest-demonstration-cases-decided-by-the-us-supreme-court. Accessed January 07, 2026.
Copied!
PRESS RELEASE @ r
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND
TOCOLUMBUS CIRCLE + NEW YORK19,N.Y. © JUdson6-8397
DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS JACK GREENBERG CONSTANCE BAKER MOTLEY
President Director-Counsel Associate Counsel
o>
FACT SHEET ON SEVEN PROTEST DEMONSTRATION
CASES DECIDED BY THE U. S. SUPREME COURT
May 20, 1963
AVENT v. NORTH CAROLINA -- Involves lunch counter demonstrations
at a Kress Variety Store in Durham, N. C. on May 6, 1960, by five
Negro and two white college students. Petitioners were convicted
under North Carolina trespass law. Jack Greenberg of New York City
argued the appeal for petitioners. Other attorneys for petitioners
are L. C, Berry, Jr., William A. Marsh, Jr., F. B, McKissick, C. 0.
Pearson, W. G. Pearson and M. Hugh Thompson of Durham, N, C,
GRIFFIN ». -- Involves a protest demonstration by five
Negro students at Glen Echo, a segregated amusement park in
Montgomery County, Md., on June 30, 1960, Petitioners were convicted
of trespassing. Joseph Raugh of Washington, D. C, argued the appeal
for petitioners. Other attorneys for petitioners are Charles T.
Duncan and Joseph Sharlitt.
LOMBARD v. LOUISIANA -- Involves a sit-in lunch counter demon-.
stration at a McCrory's store in New Orleans, La. by three Negro and
one white student on September 17, 1960. Petitioners were convictes
of criminal mischief. John P. Nelson of New Orleans, La. argued the
appeal for petitioners. Other attorneys for petitioners are Lolis ©
Eli, Nils R. Douglas and Robert F. Collins of New Orleans.
GOBER v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM -- Involves lunch counter demonstra-
tions by ten Negro youths at five stores in Birmingham, Ala. on
March 30, 1960, in defiance of a Birmingham segregation ordinance.
Petitioners were convicted of trespassing. Mrs. Constance Baker
Motley of New York City argued the appeal for petitioners, Other
attorneys for petitioners are Arthur D. Shores, Peter A. Hall,
Orzell Billingsley, Jr., Oscar W. Adams, Jr. and J. Richmond Pearson
of Birmingham.
325
SHUTTLESWORTH v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM -- Involves a conviction of
two Birmingham Negro ministers, Rev. Fred Shuttlesworth and Rev.
Charles Billups, for "inciting" the students in the Gober appeal to
sit-in on March 30, 1960. Petitioners convicted of inciting, aiding
or abetting to trespass. Mrs. Constance Baker Motley of New York
City argued the appeal for petitioners. Other attorneys of record
for petitioners are the same as in Gober.
PETERSON v, CITY OF GREENVILLE -- Involves a lunch counter sit-in
by ten Negro students at a Kress department store on August 9, 1960,
in Greenville, S. C. Petitioners were convicted of trespassing.
Matthew J, Perry of Columbia, S, C. argued the appeal for petitioners
Other attorneys for petitioners are Lincoln C, Jenkins, JP /0F
Columbia and Willie T. Smith of Greenville, S. C.
WRIGHT v, GEORGIA -- Involves the arrest of six Negro youths
for playing basketball on a city park court in Savannah, Ga. on
January 23, 1961. Petitioners were convicted of unlawful assembly.
James M, Nabrit, III argued the appeal for petitioners. Other
attorneys for petitioners are B, Clarence Mayfield and E, H. Gadsden
of Savannah, Ga.