United States v. Wilkinson County Findings of Fact and Recommendations
Public Court Documents
July 14, 1970
6 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. United States v. Wilkinson County Findings of Fact and Recommendations, 1970. 5935c427-d267-f011-bec2-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/824820ce-a334-48b5-9c13-88f1b36c515e/united-states-v-wilkinson-county-findings-of-fact-and-recommendations. Accessed November 19, 2025.
Copied!
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF
VERSUS NOS. 28030 and 28042
HINDS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, ET AL{, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI DEFENDANTS
FILED
: JUL 14 1970
ROBERT C. THOMAS, CLERK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BY ma PLAINTIFF
VERSUS CIVIL ACTION NO. 1160 (W)
WILKINSON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL, %: DEFENDANTS
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
On November 7, 1969, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
in consolidated Causes Nos. 28030 and 28042 directed the immediate
enforcement of permanent student and faculty assignment plans
prepared by the office of Education, Department of Health, Education
and Welfare in approximately 30 school systems in the Southern
District of Mississippi in order to effectuate the conversion of
these school systems to unitary systems. In said order the Appellate
Court provided a procedure whereby a school board might seek to
modify said plan through an evidentiary proceeding before this
Court. On June 12, 1970, pursuant to said procedure, the Wilkinson
County Board of Education, involved in Cause No. 1160(W) on the
docket of this Court, filed its petition seeking periission to close
the Woodville Attendance Center, presently housing grades 10-12 in
the Woodville Area, and to transfer these students and faculty
members remaining at said school to the Wilkinson County Training |
School. The board has no plans to dispose of the Woodville facility
or its equipment outside the system.
After notice to all parties, a hearing was had on July 2,
1970, at which plaintiff and the defendant school board were
represented by counsel. The N.A.A.C.P. Legal and Educational
Defense Fund, amicus curiae herein, made no appearance. ey
Plaintiff's reponse offered no objection to defendants’
proposal ) close the Woodville Attendance Center and to assign
students, formerly required to attend that school under the Gonet
ordered student assignment plan, to the Wilkinson County Training
School, provided the defendants are enjoined from selling or
otherwise disposing of that facility, or the personal property
used therein, or making any use of the facility or personal
property therein for the purpose or with the effect of frustrating
the intent of this Court's orders.
At the hearing, the defendant school board supported
its petition through the testimony of one witness, Mr. Bernard
Waites, the present superintendent of the school district.
Plaintiff, the United States of America, offered no evidence,
relying instead on its cross-examination of defendants' witness.
Prior to the implementation of the HEW lin, this school
district had four schools: Wilkinson County Training School,
housing 2196 students in grades 1-12; Finch Attendance Center,
housing 508 students in grades 1-9, both formerly black; and
Woodville Attendance Center, housing 493 students in grades 1-12,
and William Winans Attendance Center, housing 339 students in
grades 1-12, formerly predominantly white.
The HEW plan called for pairing Wilkinson County Training
School, assigning to it all students in the Woodville ares in
grades 1-9, with Woodville Attendance Center housing all 10-12
grade students in the Woodville area.
In the Centerville area, Finch Attendance Center, grades
1-6, was paired with William Winans Attendance Center, grades 7-12.
The total enrollment, county-wide, as projected by HEW, was 3536
students, 779 white and 2757 black. Following the implementation
ue
of the HEW plan, and as reflected by an enrollment report dated
April 20, 1970, on file with the Appellate Court, all whites have
withdrawn from the public schools of Wilkinson County, including
the withdrawal of all 454 whites from the Woodville Center alone,
and black attendance has dropped to 2670. The number of faculty
members consisted of 43 white teachers, 2 Orientals, and 118 blacks)
for a total of 163; there is now a teaching staff of 126, all
white teachers except 6 having withdrawn with the implementation
of the HEW plan.
In view of the non-white student attendance, the issue
presented by the petition is limited to the econonie feasibility
of closing the Woodville Attendance Center, with no racial
motivation involved.
According to building information appearing in the HEW
plan, Woodville Attendance Center has a capacity for 845 students
with 26 teaching stations and is located on a 19.98 acre site
The Wilkinson County Training Center was constructed as a 1-12
grade school with a capacity for 2310 students and 71 teaching
stations and is located on a 52.10 acre site. According to
current enrollment, the Woodville Center has a present attendance
of 406 students, all black. It is the only school in which any
white teachers, six, remained after the implementation of the HEW
plan. The current attendance at Wilkinson County Training School
is 1555 students, all black, with 71 teachers, all black. On the
basis of these statistics, the Court finds that the Wilkinson
County Training School has ample room and facilities for the
absorption of the students now assigned to Woodville Attendance
Center.
The board's petition sets out the estimated savings,
money-wise, involved in closing the Woodville Attendance Center,
3
listing separately, salaries, operation and maintenance of building
and grounds, . transportation and library expense, for a total of
$112,543.66. Superintendent Waites supported these figures in
detail in his testimony, and added the sum of approximately
$33,000.00 as the cost of operating the cafeteria, which would be
saved if the facility is closed, for a grand total of savings in
the approximate sum of $145,000.00. He stated that, of 148 public
school districts in Mississippi, ranked economically, the
Wilkinson County school system is one of the lowest being ranked
142nd. This district is to open a new vocational-technical school
in September 1970. Its costs of operation have been set at
$150,000.00 per annum, of which $107,000.00 will be a local
obligation. Turning to the two schools involved herein, Waites
stated that two portions of the Woodville facility are partially
empty and the cafeteria is not in use. As a part of the HEW
plan implementation, typewriters and high school desks were moved
from the Wilkinson school to the Woodville Center. These would
be returned for use at Wilkinson. The kitchen and cafeteria at
Wilkinson are in the process of being re-equipped, and when this
is completed, the Wilkinson facility will be fully equipped and
furnished, including all teachers' supplies, typewriters,
laboratory materials, and band instruments now located at
Wilkinson. Some athletic equipment, unadaptable for use at
Wilkinson because of a difference in school colors, and other
equipment and desks not needed at Wilkinson remain in storage
at the Woodville school. The new vocational-technical school will
be newly furnished, requiring nothing in the way of furnishings
or supplies from the other schools. This school is being construct
ed to house 240 students of the 10-12 pad level. county-wide,
which will further reduce attendance previously assigned to other
ly
high schools.
The board alleged in its petition that the Woodville
Center, if closed, will not be used directly or indirectly by
any private school. Waites testified that the board had no
plans for the use or disposition of the facility, or its contents,
which will remain stored there except for the items mentioned
above to be returned to the Wilkinson Training School. The
government completely failed to show any impending use or threat
of use of any of this property for the purpose of or with the
effect of frustrating the intent of previous court orders, evi-
dence which would normally be required to justify injunctive
relief.
Waites conceded that the defendant board has no plans
by which it hopes to Ye-capiure the white students who have fled
the system. He did say that some few white students have
expressed an interest in attending the new vocational center.
As to the faculty members who will be displaced if the
Woodville facility is closed, Waites stated the board plans to
assign them to the Wilkinson school. Since the implementation of
the HEW plan, the district has lost between 40 to 50 teachers.
Of the 6 white teachers who remained at the Woodville Center for
the remainder of the 1969-70 year, only 3 plan to return.
On the basis of the foregoing uncontradicted proof offer-
ed by the defendant school board establishing the feasibility of
closing the Woodville Attendance Center, this Court recommends
that the school board be permitted to do so. Upon the further
showing that the Wilkinson County Training school has the
capacity and is suitably equipped to serve the students rosontly
assigned to the Woodville Attendance Center, this Court
recommends that grades 10-12 in the Woodville Area be assigned
to the Wilkinson school. The Court further recommends assigning
all teachers from the Woodville Attendance Center, including the
remaining white members of the faculty, to the Wilkinson school,
despite the fact that the projected student enrollment will be
100% black. This Court has faced with shock and regret the
realization that this school board, in its compliance with HEW
and court requirements, has lost from its public school system
the entire white enrollment representing a portion of ehl dommrtity
who contribute to the district's support. It is hoped that the
retention of some white teachers will attract the return of some
of these students.
Recommended and signed in duplicate, the Clerk of this
Court being directed to file one signed duplicate in his office
and forward the other signed duplicate to the Clerk of the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and mail a copy to
each party of record.
$ /1 20
/
DATED: ™~
bh