Motion to Withdraw Appellant's Brief on Appeal
Public Court Documents
June 3, 1977
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Garner Hardbacks. Motion to Withdraw Appellant's Brief on Appeal, 1977. d1fc5ebd-26a8-f011-bbd3-000d3a53d084. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/82e8a7d7-b955-4a99-9e43-30f25e8a55b4/motion-to-withdraw-appellants-brief-on-appeal. Accessed February 12, 2026.
Copied!
R ECE*
JUN3 1977
JOHN P. HEHMAN, ClerK
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
NO. 77-1089
------------------------------------------ ----------------- JON 3
' pb
r. /i/l /h
F I L E D
CLEAMTEE GARNER, ETC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant
VS.
MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT,
ET AL,
Defendants-Appellees.
JOHN P. HEHMAN, ClerK
MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPELLANT'S BRIEF ON APPEAL, TO WITHDRAW
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS, AND TO EXTEND TIME WITHIN WHICH
TO FILE BRIEF ON APPEAL
Comes the plaintiff-appellant and moves this Honorahle
Court to permit them to withdraw their Brief on Appeal and to
direct the Clerk to ' . return the transcript of the pro
ceedings to the Clerk's Office for the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division,
and to extend the time within which to file the Brief on Appeal
and for reasons therefore would show the Court the following:
1. During the preparation of the Brief and Appendix
on appeal in this cause counsel for plaintiff-appellants ascer
tained that the transcript was incorrectly numbered in several
places and the testimony of certain witnesses did not appear in
the correct place in said transcript.
2. The Brief on Appeal was prepared by Nashville Counsel
and the Appendix on appeal was prepared by New York Counsel and
said Counsel -fourxj .it impossible because of the condition of the
transcript to coordinate their efforts in order that citations
to the Appendix could be made in the Brief on Appeal.
3. The Brief on Appeal and the Appendix were timely
filed, however, Nashville Counsel was not able to make citations
to the Appendix because of the difficulties encountered with
the paginations of the transcript.
4. If the transcript can be mailed to the Clerk's Office
for the United States District Court for the Middle District of
Tennessee, Nashville Division, Nashville Counsel will have an
opportunity to ascertain how the transcript as submitted to the
Sixth Circuit is numbered.
5. Appellcints submit that the Brief which was timely
filed should be returned to appellants in order that appellants
can make the correct citations to the Appendix.
6. Appellaints submit that a period of fourteen (14) days
would be sufficient to complete the viewing of the transcript
and.the correction of the Brief on Appeal.
7. The defendant-appellees will not be prejudiced by
the granting of the instamt Motion.
Respectfully submitted.
AVON N. WILLIAMS, JR.
MAURICE E. FRANKLIN
1414 Parkway Towers
Nashville, Tennessee 37219
WALTER BAILEY
BAILEY, HIGGS & BAILEY
161 Jefferson Avenue
Memphis, Tennessee 38103
JACK GREENBERG
JAMES M. NABRIT, III
STEPHEN RALSTON
10 Columbus Circle
Suite 2030New York, New York 10019
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellants
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing
Motion was mailed to Heniry L. Klein, Esquire, 3500 - 100 N.
Main Building, Memphis, Tennessee 38103, this the f day
of June, 1977-