Order and Permanent Injunction

2 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Redistricting
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
Case
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- f5b4fb73-e10e-f011-9989-002248226c06

Cite this item

Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Order and Permanent Injunction, 1998. f5b4fb73-e10e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/845c495d-c9b8-4c5a-aa97-158032d49218/order-and-permanent-injunction. Accessed July 11, 2025.

Copied!

    APR-03-28 0G:06PM re nT +7043345654 » 7-428 ~ P.01/02 F~1T2 

FILED 
I¥ THER RIATRICT COURT oF ingiodiig hein 

FOR THE BARTERN DIRTRICT OF CAR 

EASTERN DIVISION APR 3 1998’ 
CIVIL NO. 4136CVi04-BO(3) 

DAVID W, DANIEL, CLERK 

tS DISTRICT COURT 

MARTIN CROMARTIE, et al., E DIST. NO. CAR. 
plaincifres, 

ARLER. AMR 
EERMANENZ. SHI ECT ION 

JAMES B. HUNT, JR., in his 
capacity as Governor of the 
state of North Carolina, 
at al., 

Dafendants. 

  

HIS MATTER 14 before the Court on Plaintiffs' motion for 

preliminary injunction, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, 

and Defendants’ motion for summary judgnent. 

Following a hearing on Tuesday, March 31, 1598, tho Court 

rack these motions under advisement and new isauws the follawing 

ruling: 

3) Finding That the Twelfth Congressional pistrict under 

the 1897 North Caralina congresaianal redistricting 

plan is unconstitutionrl, the Court hersby GRANTS 

plaingiffs' motien for summary judgment as tg the 

Twelfth congressional plerriae. 

Based upnn the court's finding that the Twelfth 

Congreasianal District is uncenstitutiamal, it is 

further ORDERAD that Plaintiffe’ metien for a 

preliminary injunction and Plaintiff's request for a    



    

  

+ APR-03-98 06:06PM FOS LL De +7043345654 » 1-428 .'P.02/02 F-I72 

parmanent anjunction as contained in its complaint sre 

GRANTED. Defendants ara naradby ENJOINED from conducting 

any primary oF general election lor eongreanional 

offices under the redistricting plan enacted as 1997 

N.C. Sesplon lLawa. Chapter 11. 

3) Tt is further ORDERED that tha parties ile a wrpiteen 

gubmission no later than Wadnesday, april 8, 1938, 

addrenping the tollawing issues: 

A tea wre 
opportunity to correct the conctitutional defects 

in the 1997 plan, in default of which tha Caurt 

would undertake the Task. 

b A eposed slsction schedula to follow 

A in which providas for a primary 

election process culminating in a gensxal 

cangresaional elaction ta be neld an Tuesday, 

November 3, 1946. 

This order and permanent injunctisn are anterad hy 3 

majority of the thraa-judge panel. Civeuit Judge Bam J. Ervin, 

TTY, dissents. Memcranda with reference te thia arxder will be 

isRued as moon as possibla. 

TRIG the shira day of April, 1998, 

TERRENCE W, BOYLR 
chisf United States District Judga 

RICHARD L. VOQRHERS 
United States District Judge 

ori fansanid lJ: Ji 
TERRENCE W. BOVLE 
chief United Statep Dissrice ge

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Order and Permanent Injunction

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in