CNN Article on County Officials
Unannotated Secondary Research
September 24, 1979
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Garner Hardbacks. CNN Article on County Officials, 1979. 567f93d6-26a8-f011-bbd3-000d3a53d084. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/845d6f28-aeba-45ed-892a-f81b213a1e03/cnn-article-on-county-officials. Accessed February 12, 2026.
Copied!
J
C^/^J
Department’s complaints about the House draft concerned
restrictions on federal jurisdiction and investigative
techniques.
Heymann objected to the draft’s wholesale
elimination of federal jurisdiction that overlaps state
jurisdiction in such areas as extortion and bribery involving
state officials. In its four priority areas — white collar
crime, corruption by public officials, organized crime, and
major narcotics trafficking — the department prefers broad
federal statutory jurisdiction limited by guidelines,
federal-state working agreements, and congressional
oversight.
The department also is unhappy about the draft’s
requirement of a court order based on probable cause for
recording of conversations by undercover agents or
informants. Heymann said most such “ consensual
monitoring’’ occurs at too early a stage in an investigation
to permit a showing of probable cause.
Another provision attacked by Heymann would shift
the focus of an entrapment defense from whether the
defendant had a willingness or readiness to commit the
crime regardless of government enticement to whether the
government’s conduct would cause a “ normally
law-abiding person to commit the offense.’’
The House Criminal Justice Subcommittee is
scheduled to complete its bill within a few weeks. The
Senate Judiciary Committee began a new series of hearings
on the two bills on September 18, 20 and 24.
For further information, contact the House
subcommittee (Washington, DC 20515) and Senate
Judiciary Committee (Washington, DC 20510). Rector’s
testimony is available from the NCCD National Capitol
Office, 1101 15th St., NW, Wa.shington, DC' 20005, and
the ABA testimony may be obtained from the Criminal
Justice Section, 1800 M St., NW, Washington, DC 20036.
COUNTY OFFICIALS BACK NEW CJ POLICIES
Noteworthy pronouncements on juvenile justice, jail
reform, and law enforcement were approved by the
National Association of Counties at its recent annual
meeting.
A new juvenile justice policy statement urges counties
to remove juveniles from correctional facilities which
detain accused or adjudicated adults.
A separate statement suggests reauthorization of the
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act with two
new sections: 1) provisions to assist counties in creating
programs for serious and violent delinquents; and 2) a
program of financial incentives to states for establishing
subsidies for local governments to promote deinstitu
tionalization and develop community-based youth
programs.
Jails. A resolution on jail reform urges that Congress
supply 50% federal/50% local matching grants for
construction and renovation of local corrections and
detention facilities. Such a program might cost anywhere
from $150 million to $500 million in its first year.
According to NACo, any federal financial assistance
9/24/79
should encourage creation of regional coirections and
detention facilities and services, should place emphasis on
community-based corrections and alternatives to prison
incarceration, and should make social services available to
local prisons and jails.
A separate resolution asserts that “ the mentally ill and
retarded/developmentally disabled should not be
incarcerated in local jails and that programs to provide
alternative institutional or community-based residential
facilities should be developed.’’
Further, it is proposed tliat the federal government
“ reduce its budgetary emphasis on the reimbursement for
institutionalized care and provide increased resources for
the community-based social services program.”
Law Enforcement. Another resolution restates
NACo support for reauthorization of LEiAA and a fiscal
1980 appropriation of not less than $546 million.
In a separate resolution on law enforcement and crime
prevention, NACo encourages the use of diversion, team
policing, and interjurisdictional contracts for police
services.
For further information, contact: Herbert Jones,
Associate Director, Criminal Justice and Public Safety,
NACo, 1735 New York Ave., NW, Washington, DC'
20006 (202/785-9577).
* ♦ *
Information on Alternatives. A recent NACo survey
of 221 counties indicated strong interest in adopting
alternatives to juvenile court disposition processes such as
mediation, conciliation and arbitration. Contact: Choice
Richardson, at NACo for further details.
LISTINGS, ANNOUNCEMENTS
BRIEFS
lACP Convention Notes. Chief Joseph Dominelli of
Rotterdam, NY was elevated to president of the
International Association of Chiefs of Police at last week’s
annual meeting in Dallas. Chief John J. Norton of Foster
City, CA joined the line of succession by being elected
sixth vice president. . . . During the convention
representatives of the National Organization of Black Law
Enforcement Executives called a news conference to urge
lACP adoption of a resolution restricting the police use of
deadly force. NOBLE wants departments to institute
guidelines “ based on the principle that officers may not
draw or discharge their weapons except to protect their lives
or the lives of innocent citizens from imminent
danger. . . .” The proposal was referred to the lACP
resolutions committee for possible presentation to the full
lACP membership. Contact: lACP, 11 Firstfield Rd.,
Gaithersburg, MD 20760, and NOBLE, PO Box 1743,
Newark, NJ 07102.
Papers Solicited on Corrections. A call for papers on
“ corrections and public policy” has been announced by the
Policy Studies Journal. Issues to be explored in the