Plaintiffs' Response to Motion for Approval of Single-Member District Plan

Public Court Documents
September 6, 1991

Cite this item

Plaintiffs' Response to Motion for Approval of Single-Member District Plan preview

3 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Includes Correspondence from Blacksher to Clerk; Envelope from Blacksher to Chambers and Cunningham.

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Voting Rights
Matter
- Dillard v. Crenshaw County
Case
- Dillard v. Crenshaw County
U.S. state
- Alabama
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- cc780f13-b8d8-ef11-a730-7c1e527e6da9

Cite this item

Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Plaintiffs' Response to Motion for Approval of Single-Member District Plan, 1991. cc780f13-b8d8-ef11-a730-7c1e527e6da9. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/84ee2352-c4c6-462d-b0b9-1201953722ea/plaintiffs-response-to-motion-for-approval-of-single-member-district-plan. Accessed November 02, 2025.

Copied!

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE 
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION 

  

JOHN DILLARD, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

CIVIL ACTION 
No. 85-T-1332-N 

vv. 

CRENSHAW COUNTY, et al. 
(Re: Limestone County Bd. 
of Education) 

N
o
s
 
N
N
N
 
N
N
N
 

Defendants. 

PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR APPROVAL 
OF SINGLE-MEMBER DISTRICT PLAN 

Plaintiffs, through undersigned counsel, do not interpose 

any objection to defendant’s motion, filed August 12, 1991, for 

approval of its single-member district plan drawn with 1990 

census data and precleared under Section 5 of the Voting Rights 

Act. 

     
   Edward Still es U. Blacksher 

714 South 29th Street h Floor Title Bldg. 
Birmingham, AL 35233-2810 300 21st Street North 

205/322-6631 Birmingham, AL 35203 
205/322-1100 

JULIUS L. CHAMBERS 
DAYNA IL. CUNNINGHAM 
99 Hudson Street 
New York, NY 10013 
212/219-1900 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and 
Plaintiffs-intervenors 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, the undersigned attorney, do hereby certify that on 
September 6, 1991, I mailed or delivered a copy of the foregoing 

to Byrd R. Latham, 314 West Market Street, Athens, AL 35611. 

    

    Olin 1B Attorney for Plaintiffs 

 



  

LAW OFFICES 

JAMES U. BLACKSHER 

FIFTH FLOOR, TITLE BUILDING 

300 TWENTY-FIRST STREET NORTH 
TELEPHONE 

JAMES U. BLACKSHER BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35203 (208) 322-1100 
FACSIMILE COPIER 

LESLIE M. PROLL 

(205) 322-1125 

~ 6 September 1991 

Mr. Thomas C. Caver 

Clerk, U.S. District Court 

P.O. Box 711 

Montgomery, AL 36101 

Re: Dillard v. Crenshaw County (Limestone BOE), CA No. 85- 

T-1332-N 
  

Dear Mr. Caver: 

Please file the enclosed Plaintiffs’ Response to Motion for 

Approval of Single-member District Plan in the subject action. 

Best regards. 

Sincerely, 
/ 

rod 

es U. Blacksher 

Encl. 

cc w/encl: All counsel 

 



LAW OFFICES 

_AMES U. BLACKSHER 
FIFTH FLOOR, TITLE BUILDING 

300 TWENTY-FIRST STREET NORTH 

BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35203 

Julius L. Chambers, Esquire 
Dayna L. Cunningham, Esquire 
99 Hudson Street 
New York, NY 10013

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Plaintiffs' Response to Motion for Approval of Single-Member District Plan

Impact area

Topic

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in