Florida v. Board of Control Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida

Public Court Documents
March 8, 1957

Cite this item

Florida v. Board of Control Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Topic
- Education
Notable Person
- Thurgood Marshall
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Matter
- State of Florida v. The Board Control of Florida
Case
- State of Florida v. The Board Control of Florida
U.S. state
- Florida
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 3be37a03-b29a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 1. NAACP Legal Defense Fund Sues High Point Hospital, 1964. c4327c04-b592-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/ce5cef43-871e-41f5-8eae-382f63fdefa5/naacp-legal-defense-fund-sues-high-point-hospital. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    NAA. CP. Lecat Terese Ann EnvcATIONAL FUNn, INC. 

10 Columbus Circle, New York 19, WN. Y. 
JUDSON 6-8397 ae Bae 

| KNIGHT CHALMERs JACK'GREENBERG =" TLEY 
: Presiden: Direetor-Gotinsel 10 punsel 

NAACP LEGAL DEF 
SMMEDIATE RELEASE, Friday, July 3, 1964 SUBS HIGH POINT 

Jesse DeVore, Uirector of Public Information 
oad 

: — W.C.--Attorneys of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund téday ask 
Fa District Court here to end segregation at High Point Memorial. 

: » High Point, N.C, . 

y ee id Lindsay, who suffers from arthritis and Mrs, soome L, fal 
R @ heart condition, seek treatment at High Point al. . Bo 

2 sting the discriminatory practices of this institution, 

i Defense Fund attorneys = both patients, each a resident of 
“would be segregated solely b of race and would be = 

igned @ bed on a floor in the west wing of the hospital which is reo 
d@ for Negro patients only." 

"High Point Mencrisl is the only hospital in High Point. § 
_ EW addition, High Point residents B, Elton Gox, Thomas Fuller and> 

Se Addision would seek comprehensive physical examinations at 
it Memorial but have not done so because of discrimination, 
Say. 2 

- gated delivery rooms for white and Negro patients, 

gated newborn nursery facilities. 

; ‘PSeGregated room and ward facilities. (All Negro patients, withp 
puuuption of pediatric patients, are placed on one floor in th 

West wing.) 5 
. gated eating facilities are maintained for Negro nurses 

¢ : Negro personnel, 

_ The Goaplaint also states that High Point Memorial has received 4 
ly 31,099,019 from the United States in recent years for var 

expi » under provisions of the Hili-Burton act. 

Contributions are deductible for U. S. Income Tax Purposes 



Baace 1 Defense Fund * ou July 3, 1964 
dues Hi Point Hospital 

The U.S. Supreme Court ouept away ion foundations for jim crow 
pRestices in 2,000 hospitals and medical facilities in eleven southexa 
Stetes last March. 

North Carolina was one of the states covered. 

The Hill-Burton act was passed by Congress in 1946 go that federsl 
funds could be used by states fog.buliding sedical facilities and 
hospitals. 

BAAC: A po befense fund atterneys handling the ceee include Robert 
Bend, ten; Conrad ©. Pearson, Durham; J. LeVonne Chasbers, 

Ghniotie; and Jack Greenberg and Michael Weltener cf Hew York Citys

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Florida v. Board of Control Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida

Topic

Notable Person

Organization

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in