Letter from Lani Guinier to Hon. Alexander Stevas RE: Edmisten v. Gingles Motion to Dismiss or Affirm
Public Court Documents
August 3, 1984
4 pages
Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Letter from Lani Guinier to Hon. Alexander Stevas RE: Edmisten v. Gingles Motion to Dismiss or Affirm, 1984. bd9c9319-e792-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/880b1fb3-1c56-4a48-8704-1cccab9ed89e/letter-from-lani-guinier-to-hon-alexander-stevas-re-edmisten-v-gingles-motion-to-dismiss-or-affirm. Accessed January 09, 2026.
Copied!
August 3, 1984
Honorable Alexander L. Stevas
Clerk
Supreme Court of the Uniteci States
Washington, D.C. 20543
Re: Rufus L. Edmisten, €t aI.,
vs. Ra1ph Gingles, €t aI.
No.83-I968
Dear !1r. Stevas:
Enclosed please find forty (40) copies of the
Motion to Dismiss or Affirm fited by Appellee's
Ralph Gingles, €t. &1., in the above case.
A11 parties required to be served have been
served as evidenced by the enclosed Certificate
of Service.
Sincerely
Lani Guinier
Counsel for Appellees
LGlad
EncIs.
cc: A11 Counsel
99 HUDSON STREET (212\ 21 9-1 900 NEW YORK. N. Y, 10013
o
nnlm
Po. 83-1968 , ocroann Tenra, lgg
Rufus L. Edmisten, €t. aI.
(Petitioner or Appellant)
The Clerk will enter my sppesrance as Couneel for the
Signature
Address 99 Hudson Street, 16th floor
City urd g,"r" IIew Yorkr New York 10013
NOTE: This appearanoe must be eigned by sn individual Member of the Bar of the Supreme
Court of the Unitcd Ststea.
The Clerk is requested to notify counsel of action of the Court by means of:
[ ] Collect Telegram
[ ] Airmail Ietter
I x] Regular Msil
NOTE: When more than one attorney repnesents a single party or group of parties, eounsel
should designate a particular individual to whom notification is to be sent, with the
understanding that if other counsel should be informed he will perform that function.
In this case the person to be notified for
is:
Lani Guinier
(
99 Hudson Street, I6th floor
(Strwt Address)
New York, New York 10013
Ralph Gingles, €t. aI.
SUP *,ilffiffifirrnn?em
(llespondent, or Appellce)
[ ] Petitioner(s)
[ ] Respondent(s)
[ ] Appellant(a)
k I Appellee(s)
[ ] Amicus
cG73
(City, State ead Zip Code)
No. B3-re6B O
rN THE
SUPREIU.E COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
October Term, 1983
RUFUS L. EDMfSTEN, €t ErI.,
Appellants,
-v-
RALPH GINGLES, €t dI.,
Appellees.
On Appeal From the United
States District Court For
The Eastern District of
North Carolina
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, C. LANI GUINIER, hereby certify that f am a member of
the Bar of the Supreme Court of the United States and that I
have served three (3) copies of the Motion to Dismiss or Affirm
upon counsel for Appellants Jerris Leonard, EsQ. r Kathleen
Heenan McGuan, Law Offices of Jerris Leonard, P.C., 900 17th
Street, N.W. Suite 1020, Washington, D.C. 20007, and one coPy
each to Arthur Donaldson, Esq., Burke, Dona]dson, Holshouser &
Kenerly, 309 North t{ain Street, Salisbur}r North Carolina 28154;
James Wallace , Jr. , DePuty Attorney General for Legal Affairs,
Attorney General's Office, N.C. Department of Justice, Post
Office Box 629, Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 and Robert N.
Hunter, Jr., 20I West llarket Street, Post Office Box 3245,
Greensboro, North Carolina 27402, by depositing them, first
class postage prepaid, in the United States mail box, this
third day of August, 1984.
A11 parties required to be served ha r, been
I5th Floor
99 Hudson Street
New York, N.Y. 10013
tlo. 83-1968
IN THE
STJPREI'IE COURT OP THE T,NITED STATES
October Term, 1983
RUFUS L. EDIT{ISTEN, et 81.,
Appellants,
RLLPH GINGLES, €t al.,
Appellees.
On Appeal From the United
States District Court For
The Eastern District of
North Carolina
AFFIDAVTT OF I{AILING
C. LANI GUINIER, being duly sworn, deposes and states:
I. I am an attorney for Appellees Ra1ph Gingles,
et aI., and I am a member of the Bar of this Court.
2. Pursuant to Rule 28.2 of the Rules of this
Court, orl August 3, 1984, &t approximately 4:00 p.m., E.D.S.T.,
I caused to be placed forty (40) copies of the Appellees'
I"lotion to Dismiss or Af firm in a package addressed to the Clerk
of this Court, with first class postage prepaid,, and caused the
package to be placed in the United States mail, in a mail box
under the exclusive care and custody of the United States Postal
Service within the City and State of New York.
c,
NIER
Sworn to before me this
3rd day of August, 1984.
,
I
wttfir R. PlsE
iot t, Public, Stare ol llcw Yon
I lo. ,l{?66E8
' 0utliticd ih Queeas Countv ^ .. Samission Erpires tiarch 30, fg..trC