Letter from Lani Guinier to Hon. Alexander Stevas RE: Edmisten v. Gingles Motion to Dismiss or Affirm
Public Court Documents
August 3, 1984

4 pages
Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Letter from Lani Guinier to Hon. Alexander Stevas RE: Edmisten v. Gingles Motion to Dismiss or Affirm, 1984. bd9c9319-e792-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/880b1fb3-1c56-4a48-8704-1cccab9ed89e/letter-from-lani-guinier-to-hon-alexander-stevas-re-edmisten-v-gingles-motion-to-dismiss-or-affirm. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
August 3, 1984 Honorable Alexander L. Stevas Clerk Supreme Court of the Uniteci States Washington, D.C. 20543 Re: Rufus L. Edmisten, €t aI., vs. Ra1ph Gingles, €t aI. No.83-I968 Dear !1r. Stevas: Enclosed please find forty (40) copies of the Motion to Dismiss or Affirm fited by Appellee's Ralph Gingles, €t. &1., in the above case. A11 parties required to be served have been served as evidenced by the enclosed Certificate of Service. Sincerely Lani Guinier Counsel for Appellees LGlad EncIs. cc: A11 Counsel 99 HUDSON STREET (212\ 21 9-1 900 NEW YORK. N. Y, 10013 o nnlm Po. 83-1968 , ocroann Tenra, lgg Rufus L. Edmisten, €t. aI. (Petitioner or Appellant) The Clerk will enter my sppesrance as Couneel for the Signature Address 99 Hudson Street, 16th floor City urd g,"r" IIew Yorkr New York 10013 NOTE: This appearanoe must be eigned by sn individual Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the Unitcd Ststea. The Clerk is requested to notify counsel of action of the Court by means of: [ ] Collect Telegram [ ] Airmail Ietter I x] Regular Msil NOTE: When more than one attorney repnesents a single party or group of parties, eounsel should designate a particular individual to whom notification is to be sent, with the understanding that if other counsel should be informed he will perform that function. In this case the person to be notified for is: Lani Guinier ( 99 Hudson Street, I6th floor (Strwt Address) New York, New York 10013 Ralph Gingles, €t. aI. SUP *,ilffiffifirrnn?em (llespondent, or Appellce) [ ] Petitioner(s) [ ] Respondent(s) [ ] Appellant(a) k I Appellee(s) [ ] Amicus cG73 (City, State ead Zip Code) No. B3-re6B O rN THE SUPREIU.E COURT OF THE UNITED STATES October Term, 1983 RUFUS L. EDMfSTEN, €t ErI., Appellants, -v- RALPH GINGLES, €t dI., Appellees. On Appeal From the United States District Court For The Eastern District of North Carolina CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, C. LANI GUINIER, hereby certify that f am a member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the United States and that I have served three (3) copies of the Motion to Dismiss or Affirm upon counsel for Appellants Jerris Leonard, EsQ. r Kathleen Heenan McGuan, Law Offices of Jerris Leonard, P.C., 900 17th Street, N.W. Suite 1020, Washington, D.C. 20007, and one coPy each to Arthur Donaldson, Esq., Burke, Dona]dson, Holshouser & Kenerly, 309 North t{ain Street, Salisbur}r North Carolina 28154; James Wallace , Jr. , DePuty Attorney General for Legal Affairs, Attorney General's Office, N.C. Department of Justice, Post Office Box 629, Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 and Robert N. Hunter, Jr., 20I West llarket Street, Post Office Box 3245, Greensboro, North Carolina 27402, by depositing them, first class postage prepaid, in the United States mail box, this third day of August, 1984. A11 parties required to be served ha r, been I5th Floor 99 Hudson Street New York, N.Y. 10013 tlo. 83-1968 IN THE STJPREI'IE COURT OP THE T,NITED STATES October Term, 1983 RUFUS L. EDIT{ISTEN, et 81., Appellants, RLLPH GINGLES, €t al., Appellees. On Appeal From the United States District Court For The Eastern District of North Carolina AFFIDAVTT OF I{AILING C. LANI GUINIER, being duly sworn, deposes and states: I. I am an attorney for Appellees Ra1ph Gingles, et aI., and I am a member of the Bar of this Court. 2. Pursuant to Rule 28.2 of the Rules of this Court, orl August 3, 1984, &t approximately 4:00 p.m., E.D.S.T., I caused to be placed forty (40) copies of the Appellees' I"lotion to Dismiss or Af firm in a package addressed to the Clerk of this Court, with first class postage prepaid,, and caused the package to be placed in the United States mail, in a mail box under the exclusive care and custody of the United States Postal Service within the City and State of New York. c, NIER Sworn to before me this 3rd day of August, 1984. , I wttfir R. PlsE iot t, Public, Stare ol llcw Yon I lo. ,l{?66E8 ' 0utliticd ih Queeas Countv ^ .. Samission Erpires tiarch 30, fg..trC