Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Judge Emmett Cox Re: United States v. Albert Turner, United States v. Hogue

Public Court Documents
April 19, 1985

Cite this item

Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Judge Emmett Cox Re: United States v. Albert Turner, United States v. Hogue preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Matter
- Lani Guinier Correspondence
Case
- Lani Guinier Correspondence
U.S. state
- General
Collection
- Legal Department General
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 3d0462d3-e792-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Judge Emmett Cox Re: United States v. Albert Turner, United States v. Hogue, 1985. 3d0462d3-e792-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/89dab331-42bb-4efe-85c5-b2388a806344/correspondence-from-lani-guinier-to-judge-emmett-cox-re-united-states-v-albert-turner-united-states-v-hogue. Accessed November 23, 2025.

Copied!

    ApriI 19, 1985

Hon. Bmmett Cox
District Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of Alabama
Federal Building
113 St. Joseph Street
IlobiIe, AL 36652

Re: United States of America v. Albert Turner et al
-000I4; United States of America v.

Spencer Hogue, Jr., Ct. No. 85-00025

Dear Judge Cox:

On April 8, 1985, counsel for Spencer Hogue, Jr., defen-
dant in the above-noted matters, submitted a number of pretrial
motions in United States v. Hogue, Cr. No. 85-00025. On April
17, 1985, c mber of pretrial motions in
United States v. Turner, €t &1., 85-00014. With reference to

se be advised of the following:

1. Mr. Hogue hereby adopts the following motions
filed in United States v. Turner, Cr. No. 85-00014, as
motions i , Cr. No. 85-00025:

Motion to Suppress Evidence, etc.

Motion to Vacate or I'lodify Portion of Order
dated February 8, 1985, to Permit Defendant
to Participate in the Preparation of His
Defense

2. In support of 1"1r. Hoguers Motion in Cr. No. 85-00025
to Dismiss the Indictment, for Discovery and for an Eviden-
tiary Hearing, Mr. Hogue adopts pp. 6-76 of his Motion to Dis-
miss the Indictment as the Product of an Invidiously Selective
and Vindictive Prosecution, etc., the Exhibits (both sealed
and unsealed) to said Motion, and his Motion for Leave to File
Exhibits Under SeaI in Cr. No. 00014.

he
his

NINETY NINE HUDSON STREET (212) 219-1 900 NEW YORK, N.Y. 10013



Hon. Bnmett Cox
April 19, 1985
Page 2

3. In support of !1r. Hogue's Motion in Cr. No. 85-00025,
to Transfer Tria1 to the Northern Division, Elt Selma, Dlr.
Hogue adopts pp. 1-11 and Exhibit A to his it{otion in Cr. No.
85-00014 to Transfer the Trial to the Northern Division, at
SeIma.

4. Ivlr. Hogue adopts in Cr. No. 85-00025, the Motion of
Evelyn Turner in 85-00014 for Transfer Within Districts.

5. Mr. Hogue adopts in Cr. No. 85-00025 the l{otion for
Bill of Particulars filed by Albert Turner in Cr. No. 85-
00025.

Sincerg.\y, /)/){) il
l- - N*t,+-' rQllnazr-tt ryz
C. Lani Guinier
Attorney for Spencer Hogue, Jr.

CLG: deh

cc: Hon. Patrick H. Sims, Magistrate
Hon. John V. OrBrien, Clerk
Hon. E. T. Rolison

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Judge Emmett Cox Re: United States v. Albert Turner, United States v. Hogue

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in