Order Disallowing Interrogatories

Plaintiff's Revised Proposed Findings of Fact preview

73 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- School Desegregation
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- Sheff v. O'Neill
Case
- Sheff v. O'Neill
U.S. state
- Connecticut
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 42c65e87-a146-f011-877a-002248226c06

Cite this item

Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. Order Disallowing Interrogatories, 1970. 4a6c203c-d167-f011-bec2-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/7a537c38-39bf-4b51-89e2-c74d45f30ac0/order-disallowing-interrogatories. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    4 * 

  

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 
U. 8. COURT OF APPEALS 

jon § 3 - ™ FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT i | I.E |» 

  

JUN 301970 

EDWARD W, WADSWORTH 

CLERK; 

NOS 28042 & 28030 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Appellants 

Vv. 

HINDS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, 

et al., 

Appellees 

BEATRICE ALEXANDER, et al., 

Appellants 

Ve 

HOLMES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, 

et al., 

Appellees 

  

— wo— S— on — 

The interrogatories served by the N.A.A.C.P. Legal 

and Educational Defense Fund, Inc. in the within matters are 

disallowed. Most of the information sought has been supplied 

in the reports required by the court in its order of March 30, 

1970. The court has instituted its own systems, of which the 

reporting requirements are one, in an effort to manage these 

thirty school cases in an orderly and expeditious manner. 

 



  

4 

While general discovery will not be permitted, the J 

court will allow discovery in any particular matter upon cause 

shown. 

This ___ day of June, 1970, 

. gw 3 3 i. : ¥ I ( 

TF 3 FL 3 4 Va Ne Re 

  

Griffin B. Bell 

iliper Siatey/trouls Judge 

AUN 
Homer Thornberry / 

United States Circuit Jydge 
/ 

, / 

  

  

™, 

  

; J pr 4 

rd Fa ”, 7 fl orig // " L/ 7 / 7 3 v, / {- yg 

Lewis R. Morgan v4 
United States Circuit Judge

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Plaintiff's Revised Proposed Findings of Fact

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in