Order Denying Motion to Amend Judgment

Public Court Documents
January 10, 1978

Order Denying Motion to Amend Judgment preview

3 pages

Includes Notice of Signed Order; Correspondence from Judge Keady to Clerk.

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Norwood v. Harrison - Hardbacks. Order Denying Motion to Amend Judgment, 1978. 8c85acb2-722e-f111-88b4-000d3a199651. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/8b550cb0-d242-4095-8133-db00060d4664/order-denying-motion-to-amend-judgment. Accessed July 19, 2026.

    Copied!

     [||19eb91d6-42e1-4696-9f22-d7d686d0fbf9||] 0 

Untied Sintes District Con 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MIS SISSIE 

WESTERN DIVISION 
OXFORD, MISSISSIPPI 

  

NOTICE 

HY
 

C ~ an
) 

: 

January 10, 1978 

DELORES NORWOOD, ET AL 

V NO. WC7053-K 

D.:L. HARRISON, SB., ET AL 

TAKE NOTICE that Chief Judge William C. Keady signed an Order on 

January 10, 1978, denying the motion to amend judgment. 

NORMAN L. GILLESPIE, CLERK 

To EE ae aa FL La 
‘Deputy Clerk Jan J. Estes 

To: Mr. Melvyn R. Leventhal 
10 Columbus Circle 
New York, N.Y. - 10019 

Mr. Fred L. Bauks,6 ‘Jr. 
538 1/2 North Farish 
Jackson, Ms. 39202 

Mr. Peter Stockett 
Box 220 
Jackson, Ma, 39205 

  

    

     



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI 

Fost OFFICE DRAWER 190 

GREENVILLE, MISSISSIPPI 38701 

V/iLuiaym C. KEADY 
CHIEF JUDGE January 10,1978 

Mrs. Katherine Butts 

Chief Deputy Clerk 
United States District Court 

Oxford, Mississippi 

Re: Norwood wv. Harrison, No. WC 70-53-K 

Dear Katherine: ' 

For the jacket file I am enclosing Order in the 
above case, which I have today signed. 

Copy 1s being sent to counsel listed below. 

Yours very truly, 

7 

William C. Keady 
WCK/fg 
Enclosure 

cc: Honorable Melvyn R. Leventhal 
10 Columbus Circle 
New York, New York 10019 

Honorable Fred L. Banks, Jr. 

538 1/2 North Parish 
Jackson, Miss. 39202 

Honorable Peter Stockett 

Box 220 

Jackson, Miss. 39205  



  

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT Or MISSISSIPPI 

WESTERN DIVISION 

DELORES NORWOOD, ET AL, Plaintiffs 

¥Y. NO. WC 70~53-K 

D. L. HARRISON, SR., ET AL, Defendants 

  

The court has before it the motion of plaintiffs to 

amend judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e), F. R. Civ. P., and after 

duly considering same, the court concludes that the amount of 

attorney fees fixed in its opinion of January 3, 1978, is in 

payment of services rendered to March 2, 1976, and not thereafter. 

Plaintiffs' motion to obtain attorney fees for events 

accruing since March 2, 1976, in view Of the action taken by the 

Court of Appeals dismissing the case for failure of a final 

appealable judgment, is denied, but without prejudice to renewal 

s judgment fixing attorney fees as of March 2, 1976, 

is upheld on appeal and the Court of Appeals mandates that we 

allow fees for additional services rendered since March 2, 1976. 

Accordingly, the motion to amend judgment is denied in 

accordance with and on the conditions hereinabove stated. 

ORDERED, this, 10th day of January, 1978. 

r 

oH Meas 45 Kew 
  

Chief Judge 
United States District Court [||19eb91d6-42e1-4696-9f22-d7d686d0fbf9||] 

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.