Defendants' Second Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff
Public Court Documents
April 6, 1977
4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Campbell v. Gadsden County District School Board Hardbacks. Defendants' Second Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff, 1977. bf89590b-a211-f111-8407-7c1e526962fd. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/8caaf00b-fb37-4b88-b70a-ae09951067cf/defendants-second-set-of-interrogatories-to-plaintiff. Accessed March 05, 2026.
Copied!
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
JOHN HUTLEY, WITT CAMPBELL,
Plaintiffs,
VS. TCA 73-177
GADSDEN COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,
et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
DEFENDANTS' SECOND SET OF
INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
Pursuant to Rule 33, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
Defendants propound the following Interrogatories to Plaintiff
and class representative Witt Campbell to be answered under oath:
1. What are the particularized interests of the black
electors of Gadsden County with respect to the School Board of
Gadsden County, Florida?
2. Explain how each particularized interest identified
in response to interrogatory number 1 was ascertained.
a) If an interest or interests were determined
to exist through a public opinion poll,
please give the date of the poll and the
name and address of the person or organiza-
tion conducting it.
3. For each interest identified in response to interroga-
tory number 1 as being particularized to black voters, explain
how it differs from the interests of all white voters in Gadsden
County.
4. For each interest identified in response to interroga-
tory number 1 as being particularized to black voters, explain
how it differs from the interests of white voters in Gadsden
County who have the same socio-economic status as the majority
of black voters in Gadsden County.
5. List each instance in which plaintiff alleges or intends
to prove that defendants have been unresponsive to the particularized
interests of black voters.
6. For each instance named in answer to interrogatory
number 5 give the following information:
a) The name and address of each person who
has knowledge of each instance and the
instance of which they have knowledge.
b) The location, place and date of each
alleged unresponsive act.
c) Plaintiff's source of information about
each alleged unresponsive act.
d) The name of each person now a defendant
in this suit who participated in each
named act of unresponsiveness and identify
the act.
e) Describe the action of each person named
in (d) above which constituted participa-
tion in the alleged unresponsive act.
f) For each alleged act of unresponsiveness
list the name and address of each witness
plaintiff plans to have testify at trial
concerning that act.
g) For each witness listed in (f) above give
a summary of what the witness' testimony
will be.
h) For each alleged act of unresponsiveness
given at 4 above, explain how each defend-
ant in the case was made aware of each
particularized interest to which that
defendant was allegedly unresponsive.
i) For each witness plaintiff intends to have
testify about the matters asserted in answer
to (h) above, list the witness' name, address
and summary of his testimony.
7. Describe how at-large school board elections unconstitu-
tionally diluted the vote of black electors when a majority of
the registered voters in Gadsden County are black (as in 1972).
8. Describe how at-large school board elections unconstitu-
tionally diluted the vote of black electors when the majority of
registered Democratic electors are black.
9. In answer to defendants' interrogatories class repre-
sentative John Hutley stated that when Witt Campbell ran for
superintendent of schools in 1972 there were 7,715 registered black
voters and 7,713 registered white voters. Explain what factors
today, if any, prohibit blacks from being the majority of registered
voters in Gadsden County.
10. For each factor listed in 9 above, list the name and
address and summary of the testimony of each witness whom plaintiff
plans to have testify about that factor. If plaintiff will not use
witness testimony, explain how plaintiff intends to prove each
factor.
11. In Gadsden County how many blacks and how many whites are
presently eligible to register to vote?
a) Give the source of plaintiff's informa-
tion in answering this interrogatory.
12. How many black and how many white electors are presently
registered to vote in Gadsden County?
a) Give the source of plaintiff's informa-
tion in answering this interrogatory.
13. How many white persons are presently registered to vote
as Democrats in Gadsden County and how many black persons are
presently registered to vote as Democrats in Gadsden County?
a) Give the source of plaintiff's informa-
tion in answering this interrogatory.
14. As class representative are you prepared to pay costs
and attorney's fees in the event the defendants are the prevailing
party and the Court should award them fees as provided in 42 U.S.C.,
$1973 1° H{e)?
15. List those financial assets from which you can pay
Court costs and attorney's fees if they should be awarded.
a) For each asset give its present value
in dollars.
b) Give your gross annual income.
16. List the name and address of each witness plaintiff
intends to present at the trial of this case, and if not already
described in plaintiff's foregoing answers, give a summary of each
witness' testimony.
RICHARD J. GARDNER
201 Quincy State Bank Building
Ouincy, Florida 32351
and
C. GRAHAM CAROTHERS and
AA 2ZANA 1
MICHAEL, PEARCE “DODSON of
Ausley, McMullen, McGehee,
Carothers and Proctor
Post Office Box 391
Tallahassee, Florida 32302
(904) 224-9115
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been
furnished by United States mail to Kent Spriggs, Esquire, 324
W. College Avenue, Tallahassee, Florida 32301 and Jack Greenberg
and Charles Williams, Legal yo) Fund, 10 Columbus Circle,
New York, New York 10019 this G21 auy of April, 1977.
Wlddlliargsodn.
MICHAEL PEARCE DODSON’