Memo from Hershkoff to Counsel Re: Income-Based Busing in Wisconsin and Newsclipping
Correspondence
August 13, 1992

2 pages
Cite this item
-
Connecticut, Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Memo from Hershkoff to Counsel Re: Income-Based Busing in Wisconsin and Newsclipping, 1992. 26fa28ef-a246-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/8fc23a48-6188-494e-a216-f2f1f63793d2/memo-from-hershkoff-to-counsel-re-income-based-busing-in-wisconsin-and-newsclipping. Accessed September 18, 2025.
Copied!
TO: FROM: RE: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION 132 WEST 43RD STREET NEW YORK, N.Y. 10036 August 13, 1992 MEMORANDUM Sheff Litigation Yeam Helen Hershkoff.: ~ Income-Based Busing in Wisconsin The attached article gives an up-date on the income-based busing plan in La Cross, Wisconsin. According to the article school board members have been ousted because of their support of the plan. The plan is going forward despite opposition from a majority of the school board. Education Week, August 5, By Peter Schmidt The La Crosse, Wis., schools will go ahead this fall with a plan to bus elementary pupils based on family income, despite a new school-board majority that opposes the idea. Rather than dismantle the plan in time for the new school year, the board voted 5 to 4 last week to survey the parents of elementary children to find out which schools they prefer. The board made no promises to grant parents’ wishes, but indicated that it would try to accommodate those who object to their children’s assignments under the plan. Voters in a recall election last month ousted four board members who had backed the plan, replacing them with candidates who pledged 1992 to lower taxes and to oppose busing for socioeconomic integration. The four new members joined two others who defeated incumbents sup- porting the plan in regular board elec- tions in April. The July recall election forced two other incumbents on .he nine-member board into run-off elec- tions to be held Aug. 11. An organization called Recall Alliance earlier this year targeted for ouster the eight board members who voted in January to adopt the ‘apparently unprecedented income- based student-assignment plan. (See Education Week, Oct. 30,1991.) Integrating Hmong Students The board's decision to survey the parents of the district's 3,500 elemen- tary students came after a tense two- page 1 of 1 [a Crosse To Push Ahead With Income-Based Busing Plan Wis. district to proceed despite new opposition on school board. hour meeting in which all 23 resi- dents who addressed the board spoke in defense of the busing plan. Thai Vue, a Hmong parent, re- ceived a standing ovation from a crowd of about 200 when he ap- pealed to the board to continue the busing plan, which was primarily intended to disperse the district's population of poor Hmong students. The previous board, asked to re- draw the district's attendance bound- aries to fill two new schools, had also | taken the goal of socioeconomic bal- ance into account when approving new boundaries in January. At the time, the 29 percent of stu- dents who qualified for federally subsidized lunches were distributed unevenly. Their share of the enroll- ment in individual schools ranged from 4 percent to 68 percent. Richard Swantz, the district's su- perintendent, had proposed redis- tributing low-income students so they would make up no fewer than 15 percent and no more than 50 per- cent of any school’s population. “We have strong racial segregation here and very poor test scares because of it,” John D. Parkyn, the board's re- cently ousted president, said last week. He asserted that the district had been harming its mostly Hmong population of lower-income studer: by grouping them with pupils with the same backgrounds. Of the 3,500 elementary pupils, about 1,600 are slated under the plan to be assigned to new schools, with about half being moved to fill new buildings and the others being moved for the sake of socioeconomic balance. Douglas Farmer, a new board member, noted that incumbents had fared poorly in lower-income wards. “The socioeconomic plan was sup- posedly going to help certain sec- tions of the city,” he said. “Thoee sec- tions said, ‘No, thank you,’ very resoundingly.” But Mr. Parkyn and Mr. Swantz maintained that the results reflected dissatisfaction with high taxes more