Memo from Hershkoff to Counsel Re: Income-Based Busing in Wisconsin and Newsclipping
Correspondence
August 13, 1992
2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Memo from Hershkoff to Counsel Re: Income-Based Busing in Wisconsin and Newsclipping, 1992. 26fa28ef-a246-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/8fc23a48-6188-494e-a216-f2f1f63793d2/memo-from-hershkoff-to-counsel-re-income-based-busing-in-wisconsin-and-newsclipping. Accessed November 03, 2025.
Copied!
TO:
FROM:
RE:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
132 WEST 43RD STREET
NEW YORK, N.Y. 10036
August 13, 1992
MEMORANDUM
Sheff Litigation Yeam
Helen Hershkoff.: ~
Income-Based Busing in Wisconsin
The attached article gives an up-date on the income-based busing plan in La
Cross, Wisconsin. According to the article school board members have been ousted
because of their support of the plan. The plan is going forward despite opposition
from a majority of the school board.
Education Week, August 5,
By Peter Schmidt
The La Crosse, Wis., schools will
go ahead this fall with a plan to bus
elementary pupils based on family
income, despite a new school-board
majority that opposes the idea.
Rather than dismantle the plan in
time for the new school year, the
board voted 5 to 4 last week to survey
the parents of elementary children to
find out which schools they prefer.
The board made no promises to
grant parents’ wishes, but indicated
that it would try to accommodate
those who object to their children’s
assignments under the plan.
Voters in a recall election last
month ousted four board members
who had backed the plan, replacing
them with candidates who pledged
1992
to lower taxes and to oppose busing
for socioeconomic integration.
The four new members joined two
others who defeated incumbents sup-
porting the plan in regular board elec-
tions in April. The July recall election
forced two other incumbents on .he
nine-member board into run-off elec-
tions to be held Aug. 11.
An organization called Recall
Alliance earlier this year targeted
for ouster the eight board members
who voted in January to adopt the
‘apparently unprecedented income-
based student-assignment plan.
(See Education Week, Oct. 30,1991.)
Integrating Hmong Students
The board's decision to survey the
parents of the district's 3,500 elemen-
tary students came after a tense two-
page 1 of 1
[a Crosse To Push Ahead With Income-Based Busing Plan
Wis. district to
proceed despite
new opposition
on school board.
hour meeting in which all 23 resi-
dents who addressed the board spoke
in defense of the busing plan.
Thai Vue, a Hmong parent, re-
ceived a standing ovation from a
crowd of about 200 when he ap-
pealed to the board to continue the
busing plan, which was primarily
intended to disperse the district's
population of poor Hmong students.
The previous board, asked to re-
draw the district's attendance bound-
aries to fill two new schools, had also
| taken the goal of socioeconomic bal-
ance into account when approving
new boundaries in January.
At the time, the 29 percent of stu-
dents who qualified for federally
subsidized lunches were distributed
unevenly. Their share of the enroll-
ment in individual schools ranged
from 4 percent to 68 percent.
Richard Swantz, the district's su-
perintendent, had proposed redis-
tributing low-income students so
they would make up no fewer than
15 percent and no more than 50 per-
cent of any school’s population.
“We have strong racial segregation
here and very poor test scares because
of it,” John D. Parkyn, the board's re-
cently ousted president, said last
week. He asserted that the district
had been harming its mostly Hmong
population of lower-income studer:
by grouping them with pupils with
the same backgrounds.
Of the 3,500 elementary pupils,
about 1,600 are slated under the plan
to be assigned to new schools, with
about half being moved to fill new
buildings and the others being moved
for the sake of socioeconomic balance.
Douglas Farmer, a new board
member, noted that incumbents had
fared poorly in lower-income wards.
“The socioeconomic plan was sup-
posedly going to help certain sec-
tions of the city,” he said. “Thoee sec-
tions said, ‘No, thank you,’ very
resoundingly.”
But Mr. Parkyn and Mr. Swantz
maintained that the results reflected
dissatisfaction with high taxes more