Memo from Lani Guinier RE: Next Voting Rights Registration Strategy Meeting

Correspondence
April 12, 1984

Cite this item
Memo from Lani Guinier RE: Next Voting Rights Registration Strategy Meeting preview

1 page

Cite this item

  • Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Memo from Lani Guinier RE: Next Voting Rights Registration Strategy Meeting, 1984. dcad7912-e692-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/901a5557-9351-495f-9a0c-468d670d0aa4/memo-from-lani-guinier-re-next-voting-rights-registration-strategy-meeting. Accessed August 19, 2025.

    Copied!

    o
r9 84April L2,

MEMO TO:

FROII :

RE

CIyde
Ron
GaiI

Lani

Next Voting
Meetin

Lowell
JoeI
Jean

Registration Strategy
at 4:00

Penda
Peter
Julia

Rights
ril 23

Please be prepared to report on the results of the
factual investigation in your states on Monday, April
23 at 4:00. The information on specific counts within
your state should include both the actual procedures
for registration within the county as well as the reg-
istration rates by race if at all possible. At least
try to get the numbers of registered and unregistered
people per county or whatever information can be cor-
related with the specific practices to show the gap
between white and black registration or the nexus
between low registration rates and restrictive regis-
tration procedures. We are also interested in whatever
political inteltigence you can provide regarding the
possibility of entering into a consent decree with
specific state officials.

ft would be most helpful if you would try to organize
the types of registration practices that you are doc-
umenting by county into three categories, as follows:

1. Where there is permissive state legislation,
for example, discretionary appointments of
deputy registrars, but no one exercises that
discretion to deputize.

2. Where the discretion to deputize is exercised
selectively, either from county to county or
within a county based on the type of group seek-
ing appointment.

3. Where rules across the board are restrictive,
e.g., inconvenient hours are mandated by state
6t5tutes, a limit is placed on the number of
forms given out or satellite registration is
limited to fixed sites.

LG/r

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top