Correspondence from Clerk Ganucheau to Clerk O'Connor

Public Court Documents
September 15, 1980

Cite this item
Correspondence from Clerk Ganucheau to Clerk O'Connor preview

2 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Bolden v. Mobile Hardbacks and Appendices. Correspondence from Clerk Ganucheau to Clerk O'Connor, 1980. 6c0b1289-cdcd-ef11-8ee9-6045bddb7cb0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/90adb752-6a95-4bf4-88cd-5e17f5a00fec/correspondence-from-clerk-ganucheau-to-clerk-oconnor. Accessed July 01, 2025.

    Copied!

    ®.. States Court of Appeals 

FIFTH CIRCUIT 

TEL 504-589-6514 
GILBERT F. GANUCHEAU OFFICE OF THE CLERK 600 CAMP STREET 

CLERK NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130 

September 15, 1980 

Mr. William J. O'Connor, Clerk 

U. S. District Court 

P.O. Box 2625 

Mobile, AL 36652 

Nos. 76-4210 and 77-2042 - WILEY L. BOLDEN, ET AL. vs. 

CITY OF MOBILE, ET AL. 

(Dist. Ct. No. CA-75-297-P) 
  

Dear Mr. O'Connor: 

Enclosed is a certified copy of the Court's opinion-order 
rendered in the referenced cause on remand from the Supreme 

Court of the United States, which is issued as and for the 

  

mandate. 

Very truly yours, 

GILBERT F. GANUCHEAU, Clerk 

2 ’ ; 7 = 

o. Lid d Jaglhet 
/cfs Deputy Clerk 
enclosure 

cc and enclosure: 

Mr. Charles B. Arendall, Jr. 

Messrs. William S. Rhyne 
Charles S. Rhyne 

Messrs. J. U. Blacksher 

Larry Menefee 

Edward Still 

Messrs. Jack Greenberg « 
Eric Schnapperv 

Mr. Dennis J. Dimsey 
Ms. Miriam R. Eisenstein 

Messrs. Brian K. Landsberg 

Walter W. Barnett 

Drew S. Days 

 



  

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT -OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 

  

Nos. 76-4210, 77-2042 

  

WILEY 1. BOLDEN, ET AL., 

Plaintiffs-Appellees 

versus 

CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA, ET AL., 

Defendants-Appellants 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Alabama 

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

( SEPTEMBER 15, 1980 ) 
  

Before WISDOM, SIMPSON and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM: 

The judgment heretofore entered by the District Court 

in this cause is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the 

United States District Court for the Southern District of 

Alabama for further proceedings in light of the Supreme 

Court's opinion in City of Mobile, Ala, v. Bolden, U.S. 
  

r 100.8,.Ct. 1490 (1980).

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top