North Carolina's Housing Element State Planning Report 146.01
Reports
June 1, 1972

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. North Carolina's Housing Element State Planning Report 146.01, 1972. ddd82804-dd92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/9418150c-82be-4f29-9b50-08607e7fa6f8/north-carolinas-housing-element-state-planning-report-14601. Accessed May 21, 2025.
Copied!
PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT I I I I 4 I{ It it B t i li t; ii li t; li I l: t' I l; I li ll l; i ,i ;l ii -10- imposed by substandard occupancy on even one family in the State. lt is atso true, however, that without a clear understandi.ng of the problem and how it is distributed in space, no commitment to eliminate it - no matter how slncere-can possibly have much impact. lt is the purpose of this section of the housing element, therefore, to lay the basis for a better understanding of the problem, to indicate those aspects of the problem that require additional clarification and to provide the foundation for a housing planning process in North Carolina which can and must become an integral component of the Statewide Development Pol icy North Snrolinats Housing: A Tragedv OLGrave Proportions North Carolina, like each of her sister states, suffers from a housing crisis of grave proportions. As is nrost f requently the case throughout the country, the problem impacts differently on different segments of the population, and varies with respect to the geography of the State. Thus, in North Carolina, renters are more likety to suffer from serious housing defic.iencids than owners; blacks rnore prone than whites; rural famllies. npre than urban dwellers; and, of course, the Poor are nrost at risk, re- gardless of their other socio-economic characteristics. As implled in the earlier discussion of the Statewide Development Policy, North Carolina remains a predominantly rural, non-farm state that is charac- terized by large numbers of small and intermedlate sized urban population clusters within.-its boundaries. Thus, although approximately 55 percent of the Statets population is classified as rural, there are forty-one places of 10,000 people or more, including six Standard Metropol itan Statistical Areas, wherein more than 35 percent of the population resides. -1 1- TheslightlymorethanfivemilllonNorthCaroliniansoccuPymorethan l.6millionpermanent(yearround)housingunits,alrrpsttwo-thirdsof which are owned by the fami ries in residence (Tabte 0ne). vrhre reriabre dataonhouslngconditionsincludedintheCensusofHousingarevery limitedandscarcelyrelatehowdebilitatinginsplritandlIfestyle substandardoccupancyis,thedatadoreflectminimumlevetsofeffort requiredtomeeteventhenpstminimumneedsofthecitizenry. lnNorthCarolinainlgT0,roughlyoneoutofeightdwellingunitslacks some or a, plumbing facirities; one in nine occupied units are overcrowded; whileonehousingunitintwenty.fivelackbothplumbingfacilitiesand areovercrowded.lgnoringthespatialdistributionofhousingunitsin the state for a moment ronger, and concentrating sorety upon the dimensions ofraceandtenure,impliesthattheinterrelatedproblemsofraceand povertyinNorthCarolinaplaythemselvesoutastheydoinmostother states in the union' Whereas' for example' seven out of ten whlte families arehomeowners,lessthanfiveintenblackfamiliesareowner-occupants. And while homeowners i n genera I errJvv carorina, ress thanone in ten white owners occupy housing lacking some plumbingfacilities,comParedtothreeoutoftenblackowners.rorrenters, theproblemsforbothracesaregreater,whilethegapbetweenthemremains verylarge.Forwhiterenters,l4percentlacksomeplumbing,comparedto46 percent of all non-whites. And, as the data in Table One illustrates, the race. tenure dichotomy.exists with respect to overcrowding as well' .ne final way of SurnmarizingthisproblemistocomparegeneraIoccuPancycharacteristics in Norfh carorina with the characteristics of just the substandard inven- tory(TableTwo).Whereas,forexample,65percentoftheStatersinventoryis -12- Table I SELECTED CHARACTERI STI CS OF THE HOUSING STOCK BY RACE. 1970 in NORTH CAROLINA Nurnber of Owner 0ccupied Units Percent 0wner Occupied Number of Renter 0ccupied Units Percent Renter 0ccupied Number of Units Lacking Some 0r All Facilities Pe rcen t Nunber of Occupied Units With l.0l 0r Hore Persons Per Room Pe rcen t Nunber of 0ccupied Units With All Plumbing Faci I ities and l.0l 0r More Parscns Per Room Percen\ Nunber 0f 0ccupied Units Lacking Sorne 0r All Plumbing Facilities and l.0l 0r More Persons Per Room Percent lJh i te 858097 69.85 370383 30.ls 109179 8.887 83642 5.809 65376 5.322 L8266 1.487 Non-!Jh i te 127519 45.463 L52973 54.537 L52973 38.45 70908 25.29 33777 L2.O42 37131 13. 238 TOTAL 985616 65. 317 523356 34.693 2L7027 L4.392 154550 12.794 991s3 6.57 55397 3.67r SOURCE: The 1970 Census of Popu I ation and Hous i ng -t5- Table 2 Owner occuPied units Renter occuPled units Black occuPied Average monthlY rent Average val ue Number 97007 t20020 I 07848 $ 35.50 $5,869. I I Percent 44.10% 55.30, 4e.6ei Source:ThelgT0UnitedStatesCensusofPooulationandHousing CHARACTERI ST I CS HOUSING LACKING ifFActLlrl I owner occupied, only 45 percent of Similarly, whereas only 23 percent res ided i n by non-wh ite fami I ies, housing is occupied by non-whites. the substandard inventory is so class,r,"O. of all occupied housing in l.lorth Carolina is practlcal ly one half of al I substandard while awaiting f inar pubtication of comprete census reports, some tndication can be obtained of how the problem is dlstrlbuted among urban and rural areas of the state. Beginning with the baslc urban-rurat dichotomy, forty-two Percent of the housing units in North Carolina are located in urban areas, as defined by the U.S. census.0f those, only 6 percent lack all or some plumbing facilities. of the almost sixty percent of the statets rural housing units, which inctudes some 9401000 dwellings, alrnost 210,000 suffer f rom ptt.rmbing def iciencies (Table Three)..All together then, of the nrore than 250,000 dwelling units lacking complete ptumuing facitities, approximately 80 percent are located in rural North carol ina. A Note 9n Housinq Qual ilv l'he reader of this report will note that alt data referring to housing quality in the following tabtes in actualify deals with the presence or absence of complete plumbing facilities in occupied housing units in North carol ina. whereas, the tabtes are appropriatery captioned, frequentry the text of the report will, in analyzing fhe tables, refer to substandard housing conditions. Traditionally, of course, the presence of comptete plumbing faci lit,es has been a necessary but not a suf f icient condition for classifying an.y housing unit as standard. As most housing analysts are aware, therrtgTo Census of poputation and Housingt'doas not classify housing units according to their physicat condition, -t5- Table 5 Urban-Rural Housing Units By Plumbing Facilities, North Carolina, 1970 Permanent Housing Units ln N.C. Complete Pl umbing Faci I ities lncomplete Plumbing Faci I ities Urban Housing Units in N.C. Complete Plumbing Faci I ities lncomplete Pl umbing Faci I ities Rural Houslng Units in N.C. Complete Pl umbing Faci I ities lncomplete Plumbing Faci I ities I ,616,099 I ,363,327 252,772 676,543 633,291 43,252 939,556 730,036 209,520 (84.4r) (|5.61) (4t.9tr) 03.6%) ( 6.4fi) (58. rr) (77.7fi) Q2.3%) Source: Charles E. Lewis, Extension Sociologist Commun i ty Deve I opment Department N. C. Agrigultural Extension Service Prepared from Advanced Report, . 1970 Census of Housing, U' S' Department of Crmmerce, Bureau of the Census' - 16- as the Bureau has done in the past. The sound, deterioratingand dilapidated designations have been dropped because they have proven to be unreliable bases for judging housing quality when the assessments are.made by enumerators, each of whom bring to the task a variety of ,biases which affects his views of the world. Rather than continue to publish statistics on housing quality which cannot be depended upon, in 1970, the Bureau tlmited its concern to measuring housing characteristics that can be objectively documented and replicated, thus the primary emphasis on the presence or absence of comptete plumbing faci I ites. For the purPoses of this report, all housing lacking sorne or al I plumbing facilities are considered substandard. Although plumbing def iciencies would be expected to be highly correlated with structura I deficiencies, using the plumbing variable alone is almost certain to result in an underestimate of the real problem. This would be particularly the case in the larger urban areas where structural deficiencies are more abundant than the incidence of r:ult1' cr incemplete plumbing faci lities. At best, therefore, a mlnimum or bench- mark of the iagnitude of North Carolinars housing difficulties is presented here. As indicated in the introduction to the Housing Element, the Stafets Development Pol icy Program is based upon a multi-county, tr€gional approach to the analysis of problems of growfh and development. As indicated atso, this perspective is founded upon the significant regional variations exist- ing in North Carol iha with respect to population characteristics, economic base, resources and growth potential. Table Four presents selected social and hcusing characteristics of the Statets Mountain, Piedmont and Coastal Plains regions which clearly illustrate the importance of geography in North Carotina. Economic Characteristics and Housinq Conditions -17- Table 4 Selected Housing and Social Characteristics of the Mountain, Piedmont and Coastal Plains Regions, North Carol ina, 1970 N. C. Appal achia Piedmont Popu lation 5,082,059 I ,037 ,212 Percent Black 22.4 10.0 lulatrlarch lndex 12.6 10.5 Number of Hous i ng Un its I ,638,246 358,095 Overcrowding lndex 10.2 9.0 Bl ack Overcrowo i ng 25.3 19 .3 lncomplete Plumbing 14.4 14.0 Black lncomplete Plumbing 38.4 l9.B Average Monthly Rent $67 $65 Black Average Reot $48 552 Owner Occupancy Rate 65.3 72.8 Black Average Occupany Rate 45.5 47.7 Vacancy Rate 6.6 7.2 i S ing l e Fami I y Un its 82.7 84 .7 I Uong Vacancy 3B.B 43.9 2,112,750' 20.5 lt.9 678,706 9.3 24.3 10.2 27.6 $70 $53 66.3 45.3 4.8 82.3 32.5 Vacancy Rate: Percent Long Coasta I Plains I ,932 1097 3l .l t4.6 601 ,445 t2.t 27.3 t9.6 5r.0 $64 $42 59.6 45.1 8.4 8t.9 40.2 Legend: Matriarch lndex: the percentage of fami I ies with members under age eighteen which have female heads. Overcrowding lndex: the percentage of occupied housing units with l.0l or more Persons per room. Bl ack Overcrowd i ng: the percentage of b lack occup ied hous i ng r-rni ts w i th I .01 or rnore persons Per room. lncomplete Plumbing: the percentage of occupied housing units lacking complete plumbing the percentage of year-round housing units that are vacant. Vacancy: the percentage of vacant year-round housing units that have been vacant for six months or more. Source: 1970 Census of Population and Housing