North Carolina's Housing Element State Planning Report 146.01
Reports
June 1, 1972
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. North Carolina's Housing Element State Planning Report 146.01, 1972. ddd82804-dd92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/9418150c-82be-4f29-9b50-08607e7fa6f8/north-carolinas-housing-element-state-planning-report-14601. Accessed November 27, 2025.
Copied!
PLAINTIFF'S
EXHIBIT
I
I
I
I
4
I{
It
it
B
t
i
li
t;
ii
li
t;
li
I
l:
t'
I
l;
I
li
ll
l;
i
,i
;l
ii
-10-
imposed by substandard occupancy on even one family in the State. lt is
atso true, however, that without a clear understandi.ng of the problem and
how it is distributed in space, no commitment to eliminate it - no matter
how slncere-can possibly have much impact. lt is the purpose of this
section of the housing element, therefore, to lay the basis for a better
understanding of the problem, to indicate those aspects of the problem
that require additional clarification and to provide the foundation for
a housing planning process in North Carolina which can and must become
an integral component of the Statewide Development Pol icy
North Snrolinats Housing: A Tragedv OLGrave Proportions
North Carolina, like each of her sister states, suffers from a housing
crisis of grave proportions. As is nrost f requently the case throughout
the country, the problem impacts differently on different segments of the
population, and varies with respect to the geography of the State. Thus,
in North Carolina, renters are more likety to suffer from serious housing
defic.iencids than owners; blacks rnore prone than whites; rural famllies.
npre than urban dwellers; and, of course, the Poor are nrost at risk, re-
gardless of their other socio-economic characteristics.
As implled in the earlier discussion of the Statewide Development Policy,
North Carolina remains a predominantly rural, non-farm state that is charac-
terized by large numbers of small and intermedlate sized urban population
clusters within.-its boundaries. Thus, although approximately 55 percent of the
Statets population is classified as rural, there are forty-one places of
10,000 people or more, including six Standard Metropol itan Statistical Areas,
wherein more than 35 percent of the population resides.
-1 1-
TheslightlymorethanfivemilllonNorthCaroliniansoccuPymorethan
l.6millionpermanent(yearround)housingunits,alrrpsttwo-thirdsof
which are owned by the fami ries in residence (Tabte 0ne). vrhre reriabre
dataonhouslngconditionsincludedintheCensusofHousingarevery
limitedandscarcelyrelatehowdebilitatinginsplritandlIfestyle
substandardoccupancyis,thedatadoreflectminimumlevetsofeffort
requiredtomeeteventhenpstminimumneedsofthecitizenry.
lnNorthCarolinainlgT0,roughlyoneoutofeightdwellingunitslacks
some or a, plumbing facirities; one in nine occupied units are overcrowded;
whileonehousingunitintwenty.fivelackbothplumbingfacilitiesand
areovercrowded.lgnoringthespatialdistributionofhousingunitsin
the state for a moment ronger, and concentrating sorety upon the dimensions
ofraceandtenure,impliesthattheinterrelatedproblemsofraceand
povertyinNorthCarolinaplaythemselvesoutastheydoinmostother
states in the union' Whereas' for example' seven out of ten whlte families
arehomeowners,lessthanfiveintenblackfamiliesareowner-occupants.
And while homeowners i n genera I errJvv
carorina, ress thanone in ten white owners occupy housing lacking some
plumbingfacilities,comParedtothreeoutoftenblackowners.rorrenters,
theproblemsforbothracesaregreater,whilethegapbetweenthemremains
verylarge.Forwhiterenters,l4percentlacksomeplumbing,comparedto46
percent of all non-whites. And, as the data in Table One illustrates, the race.
tenure dichotomy.exists with respect to overcrowding as well' .ne final way of
SurnmarizingthisproblemistocomparegeneraIoccuPancycharacteristics
in Norfh carorina with the characteristics of just the substandard inven-
tory(TableTwo).Whereas,forexample,65percentoftheStatersinventoryis
-12-
Table I
SELECTED CHARACTERI STI CS OF THE HOUSING STOCK
BY RACE. 1970 in NORTH CAROLINA
Nurnber of Owner 0ccupied Units
Percent 0wner Occupied
Number of Renter 0ccupied Units
Percent Renter 0ccupied
Number of Units Lacking Some 0r
All Facilities
Pe rcen t
Nunber of Occupied Units With
l.0l 0r Hore Persons Per Room
Pe rcen t
Nunber of 0ccupied Units With All
Plumbing Faci I ities and l.0l 0r
More Parscns Per Room
Percen\
Nunber 0f 0ccupied Units Lacking
Sorne 0r All Plumbing Facilities
and l.0l 0r More Persons Per Room
Percent
lJh i te
858097
69.85
370383
30.ls
109179
8.887
83642
5.809
65376
5.322
L8266
1.487
Non-!Jh i te
127519
45.463
L52973
54.537
L52973
38.45
70908
25.29
33777
L2.O42
37131
13. 238
TOTAL
985616
65. 317
523356
34.693
2L7027
L4.392
154550
12.794
991s3
6.57
55397
3.67r
SOURCE: The 1970 Census of Popu I ation and Hous i ng
-t5-
Table 2
Owner occuPied units
Renter occuPled units
Black occuPied
Average monthlY rent
Average val ue
Number
97007
t20020
I 07848
$ 35.50
$5,869. I I
Percent
44.10%
55.30,
4e.6ei
Source:ThelgT0UnitedStatesCensusofPooulationandHousing
CHARACTERI ST I CS HOUSING LACKING
ifFActLlrl I
owner occupied, only 45 percent of
Similarly, whereas only 23 percent
res ided i n by non-wh ite fami I ies,
housing is occupied by non-whites.
the substandard inventory is so class,r,"O.
of all occupied housing in l.lorth Carolina is
practlcal ly one half of al I substandard
while awaiting f inar pubtication of comprete census reports,
some tndication can be obtained of how the problem is dlstrlbuted among
urban and rural areas of the state. Beginning with the baslc urban-rurat
dichotomy, forty-two Percent of the housing units in North Carolina are
located in urban areas, as defined by the U.S. census.0f those, only 6 percent
lack all or some plumbing facilities. of the almost sixty percent of the
statets rural housing units, which inctudes some 9401000 dwellings, alrnost
210,000 suffer f rom ptt.rmbing def iciencies (Table Three)..All together then, of
the nrore than 250,000 dwelling units lacking complete ptumuing facitities,
approximately 80 percent are located in rural North carol ina.
A Note 9n Housinq Qual ilv
l'he reader of this report will note that alt data referring to housing
quality in the following tabtes in actualify deals with the presence or
absence of complete plumbing facilities in occupied housing units in North
carol ina. whereas, the tabtes are appropriatery captioned, frequentry the
text of the report will, in analyzing fhe tables, refer to substandard
housing conditions. Traditionally, of course, the presence of comptete
plumbing faci lit,es has been a necessary but not a suf f icient condition for
classifying an.y housing unit as standard.
As most housing analysts are aware, therrtgTo Census of poputation and
Housingt'doas not classify housing units according to their physicat condition,
-t5-
Table 5
Urban-Rural Housing Units
By Plumbing Facilities, North Carolina, 1970
Permanent Housing Units ln N.C.
Complete Pl umbing Faci I ities
lncomplete Plumbing Faci I ities
Urban Housing Units in N.C.
Complete Plumbing Faci I ities
lncomplete Pl umbing Faci I ities
Rural Houslng Units in N.C.
Complete Pl umbing Faci I ities
lncomplete Plumbing Faci I ities
I ,616,099
I ,363,327
252,772
676,543
633,291
43,252
939,556
730,036
209,520
(84.4r)
(|5.61)
(4t.9tr)
03.6%)
( 6.4fi)
(58. rr)
(77.7fi)
Q2.3%)
Source: Charles E. Lewis, Extension Sociologist
Commun i ty Deve I opment Department
N. C. Agrigultural Extension Service
Prepared from Advanced Report, .
1970
Census of Housing, U' S' Department of
Crmmerce, Bureau of the Census'
- 16-
as the Bureau has done in the past. The sound, deterioratingand dilapidated
designations have been dropped because they have proven to be unreliable bases
for judging housing quality when the assessments are.made by enumerators,
each of whom bring to the task a variety of
,biases
which affects his views
of the world. Rather than continue to publish statistics on housing quality
which cannot be depended upon, in 1970, the Bureau tlmited its concern
to measuring housing characteristics that can be objectively documented and
replicated, thus the primary emphasis on the presence or absence of comptete
plumbing faci I ites.
For the purPoses of this report, all housing lacking sorne or al I plumbing
facilities are considered substandard. Although plumbing def iciencies would
be expected to be highly correlated with structura I deficiencies, using the
plumbing variable alone is almost certain to result in an underestimate of
the real problem. This would be particularly the case in the larger urban
areas where structural deficiencies are more abundant than the incidence of
r:ult1' cr incemplete plumbing faci lities. At best, therefore, a mlnimum or bench-
mark of the iagnitude of North Carolinars housing difficulties is presented here.
As indicated in the introduction to the Housing Element, the Stafets
Development Pol icy Program is based upon a multi-county, tr€gional approach
to the analysis of problems of growfh and development. As indicated atso,
this perspective is founded upon the significant regional variations exist-
ing in North Carol iha with respect to population characteristics, economic
base, resources and growth potential. Table Four presents selected social and
hcusing characteristics of the Statets Mountain, Piedmont and Coastal Plains
regions which clearly illustrate the importance of geography in North Carotina.
Economic Characteristics and Housinq Conditions
-17-
Table 4
Selected Housing and Social Characteristics
of the Mountain, Piedmont and Coastal
Plains Regions, North Carol ina, 1970
N. C. Appal achia Piedmont
Popu lation 5,082,059 I ,037 ,212
Percent Black 22.4 10.0
lulatrlarch lndex 12.6 10.5
Number of Hous i ng Un its I ,638,246 358,095
Overcrowding lndex 10.2 9.0
Bl ack Overcrowo i ng 25.3 19 .3
lncomplete Plumbing 14.4 14.0
Black lncomplete Plumbing 38.4 l9.B
Average Monthly Rent $67 $65
Black Average Reot $48 552
Owner Occupancy Rate 65.3 72.8
Black Average Occupany Rate 45.5 47.7
Vacancy Rate 6.6 7.2
i S ing l e Fami I y Un its 82.7 84 .7
I Uong Vacancy 3B.B 43.9
2,112,750'
20.5
lt.9
678,706
9.3
24.3
10.2
27.6
$70
$53
66.3
45.3
4.8
82.3
32.5
Vacancy Rate:
Percent Long
Coasta I
Plains
I ,932 1097
3l .l
t4.6
601 ,445
t2.t
27.3
t9.6
5r.0
$64
$42
59.6
45.1
8.4
8t.9
40.2
Legend:
Matriarch lndex: the percentage of fami I ies with members under age
eighteen which have female heads.
Overcrowding lndex: the percentage of occupied housing units with l.0l
or more Persons per room.
Bl ack Overcrowd i ng: the percentage of b lack occup ied hous i ng r-rni ts w i th
I .01 or rnore persons Per room.
lncomplete Plumbing: the percentage of occupied housing units lacking
complete plumbing
the percentage of year-round housing units that are vacant.
Vacancy: the percentage of vacant year-round housing units
that have been vacant for six months or more.
Source: 1970 Census of Population and Housing