Fifth Circuit Opinion

1 page

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Voting Legislation and Constitutional Amendments
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas
Case
- LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas
U.S. state
- Texas
Collection
- Case Files
Creator
Publisher
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 6d0d8555-227c-f011-b4cc-6045bdffa665

Cite this item

Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Fifth Circuit Opinion, 1990. 6d0d8555-227c-f011-b4cc-6045bdffa665. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/94196a52-0515-467e-b180-bd09878b3f2e/fifth-circuit-opinion. Accessed November 06, 2025.

Copied!

    ore OF UNITED LATIN AM. CITIZENS v. k EMENTS 

LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERI- 
CAN CITIZENS, COUNCIL NO. 4434, 

Plaintiffs—-Appellees, 

and 

Jesse Oliver, et al., Intervening 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

V. 

William P. CLEMENTS, etc., et 

al., Defendants, 

Jim Mattox, et al. 

Defendants—-Appellants, 

V. 

Judge F. Harold ENTZ, etc., Judge Sharo- 

lyn Wood, etc., and George S. Bayoud, 

Jr., etc., Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

Tom Rickhoff, Susan D. Reed, John J. 

Specia, Jr., Sid L. Harle, Sharon Mac- 

rae and Michael P. Pedan, Bexar Coun- 

ty, Texas State District Judges, Appel- 

lants. 

No. 90-8014. 

United States Court of Appeals, 

Fifth Circuit. 

May 16, 1990. 

Appeals from the United States District 
Court for the Western District of Texas, 

Lucius Desha Bunton, III, Chief Judge. 

* Judges Williams and Garwood are recused, and 

4173 

(Opinion May 11, 1990, 5 Cir., 1990, 

— F.2d —) 

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, 

REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, 

JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, 

JONES, SMITH, DUHE, and 
BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.” 

BY THE COURT: 

A majority of the judges in active ser- 

vice, on the Court’s own motion, having 

determined to have this case reheard en 

banc, 

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be 

reheard by the Court en banc on Tuesday, 

June 19, 1990 in New Orleans, Louisiana. 

The parties and the United States as ami- 

cus may file simultaneous supplemental 

briefs within 20 days from the date of this 

order. 

therefore did not participate in this decision. 

Adm. Office, U.S. Courts—West Publishing Company, Saint Paul, Minn.

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Fifth Circuit Opinion

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Creator

Publisher

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in