Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Alexander L. Stevas (Clerk) Re: Edmisten v. Gingles
Public Court Documents
May 9, 1985

Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Alexander L. Stevas (Clerk) Re: Edmisten v. Gingles, 1985. b5bbb5a2-e792-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/94641c61-e016-42d8-9285-cf3c0304c91d/correspondence-from-lani-guinier-to-alexander-l-stevas-clerk-re-edmisten-v-gingles. Accessed April 09, 2025.
Copied!
May 9, 1985 The Honorable Alexander L. Stevas Clerk Supreme Court of the United States Washington, D. C- 20543 Re: 83-1958 Rufus L. Edmisten, €t aI' v' Ral"ph Gingles, et aI. Dear Mr. Stevas: I am counsel of record for appellees in the above -.ft:.on.d case in which probable jurisdiction was noled, April 29, Igg5. pursuant to our conversa- tion of iray 3, 1985, I write to alert you to a fotential lroblem r have regardinq the briefing lched,ule dlscribed in the Memorandum to Counsel in iai.= Granted Review on April 29, 1985. The brief i"r appellents is now due June 13, 1985. Accordingly, the brief for appellees will be due in mid-July, 1985. As I stated during our conversation, I aln also lead counsel for one oi three co-defendants in a criminal j;t case that is set for trial June L7, 1985 ]gt}!?q i:=i== -'- s"==.:: = er---4f = - Cr' No' 8s00014 and Cr. No. S the trial is sched- uled to last four weeks, during the sane period in which f would be preparing the brief for appellees. I thought it prudent to bring this apEarent conflict to youi atten-tion early on. Counsel for appellants frav6 stated they do not object to my seeking an ex- tension of time within which to file my brief' Thank you for your consideratj-on and assistance. Respectfull \ YourVl Cril,&'^*A* Carol Lani Guinier CLG/T cc: Jerris Leonard, Esg. James Wa11ace, Esq. NI\]ETY NINE HUDSON STREET i212t 219-i'3C0 \ra ir' " , in. ,\l 'l i -jU lJ