Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Alexander L. Stevas (Clerk) Re: Edmisten v. Gingles

Public Court Documents
May 9, 1985

Cite this item

Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Alexander L. Stevas (Clerk) Re: Edmisten v. Gingles preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Matter
- Lani Guinier Correspondence
Case
- Lani Guinier Correspondence
U.S. state
- General
Collection
- Legal Department General
Taxonomy
Identifier
- b5bbb5a2-e792-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Alexander L. Stevas (Clerk) Re: Edmisten v. Gingles, 1985. b5bbb5a2-e792-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/94641c61-e016-42d8-9285-cf3c0304c91d/correspondence-from-lani-guinier-to-alexander-l-stevas-clerk-re-edmisten-v-gingles. Accessed November 05, 2025.

Copied!

    May 9, 1985

The Honorable Alexander L. Stevas
Clerk
Supreme Court of the United States
Washington, D. C- 20543

Re: 83-1958 Rufus L. Edmisten, €t aI' v'
Ral"ph Gingles, et aI.

Dear Mr. Stevas:

I am counsel of record for appellees in the above
-.ft:.on.d case in which probable jurisdiction was
noled, April 29, Igg5. pursuant to our conversa-
tion of iray 3, 1985, I write to alert you to a

fotential lroblem r have regardinq the briefing
lched,ule dlscribed in the Memorandum to Counsel in
iai.= Granted Review on April 29, 1985. The brief
i"r appellents is now due June 13, 1985. Accordingly,
the brief for appellees will be due in mid-July, 1985.

As I stated during our conversation, I aln also lead
counsel for one oi three co-defendants in a criminal
j;t case that is set for trial June L7, 1985 ]gt}!?q
i:=i== -'- s"==.:: = er---4f = - Cr' No' 8s00014
and Cr. No. S the trial is sched-
uled to last four weeks, during the sane period in
which f would be preparing the brief for appellees.

I thought it prudent to bring this apEarent conflict
to youi atten-tion early on. Counsel for appellants
frav6 stated they do not object to my seeking an ex-
tension of time within which to file my brief'

Thank you for your consideratj-on and assistance.

Respectfull \ YourVl

Cril,&'^*A*
Carol Lani Guinier

CLG/T

cc: Jerris Leonard, Esg.
James Wa11ace, Esq.

NI\]ETY NINE HUDSON STREET i212t 219-i'3C0 \ra ir' " , in. ,\l 'l i -jU lJ

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Alexander L. Stevas (Clerk) Re: Edmisten v. Gingles

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in