Jones v. City of Lubbock Memorandum Opinion
Public Court Documents
January 20, 1983

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Bozeman v. Pickens County Board of Education. Gillman v. State Court Opinion, 1910. e511843f-f192-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/5bead28d-4ac3-4dff-9c1d-e8228e914a28/gillman-v-state-court-opinion. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
ta ( , I r , , a qr&,t* e RALEIGH DIVISION I I ) ) CTVTL AETION no. 81-803-crv-5 RALPH GINGI.PS, et aI. ) Plaintlffs, I v. rN THE T'NITED STATES DISTRICT COURq POR THE EASTERN DTSTRICT OF NORTH CAROLTNA ) RUFUS EDMISTEN, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) Alex X. Brock, being duly srdorn, hereby deposes and says: 1. l, Alex K. Brockr Brn Secretary-Dlrector of the state Boarcl of Elections of North carolina, the offices of whlch are located at suite Bo1, Raleigh Brrild.inq, 5 west Hargett Street, Raleigh, North Caroll-na 276Oli 2- r have served in that capacity continuously since August 5, L965, and was, therefore, servlng in that capacity in 1967 when the General Assembly of North Carolina ratified chapter 640, Session Laws of L967, which contained proposals for two amendments to the constitution of North carolina; 3. Those two proposals hrere approved by vote of the peopre in November of 1968 and became Article rr, s4(3) (presently Article ff, 53(3)) and Article ff, SG(3) (presently Article rf 55 (3) ) of the ConstitutLon of Dlorth Carolina; 4. ArticLe ff, 53(3) provides, inter alia, that the General Assembly of North Carolina is prohibited from dividing counties in forming the state senate electoral districts; Artlcle ff , 55(3) provides, iptgr a1la, that the General Asserqbly is prohibtted from dividing counties ln forming State Representative electoral dLstricts ? 5. As best f recalI, f did not deem these amendments to the State ConstitutLon to be subject to the submissl.on requirements of 55 of the voting Rtghts Act of 1965, at the time of.their adoptLon, and, therefore, r did not submit the amend.ments to the Attorney General of the Unlted States for approval or seek thelr approval by the Unlted States District Court for the District of Columbla i . of on : r I k l6 !!tbs". t ""orn*issLon ExpLres 1* qfo -2- 6. I have, however, now advl.sed the Attorney General the 1g5g co'rstLtutional alrendments, by way of correspondence the dates of Septerober 22, 23, 24 and 28, 1981; 7. A copy of all of my corresPondence to the Attorney General, regardlng J.n part the 1958 amendments Ls attached' hereto, along with pertlnent attachments to the corresPondenee, excluding copLes of sessLon laws, the eorresPondence and attach- ments belng incorporated herein by reference: 8. I have subnLtted all information to the Attorney General whl-ch f deerc to be of any Lrlportance or significance to a determina- tion by him as to whether the amendments satisfy the reggirements of s5 of the ltoting Rights Act of 1965 and have requested that the determLnation be made as expedltiously as possible; g. f have also submitted to the Attorney General, for his approval, copies of chapter 8oo, chapter 82L, and Chapter 87, Session Laws of 1981, these constituting, resPectively, North Carolina's apportionment plans for the state House and Senate' and state Congressional electoral districts ? l0.Ihavesubrnittedallotherinformationdeemedbyrne to be pertinent to the apportionment plans, includinq aII supplernental information requested by the Attorney General' 01,*H tsr,^L Alex K. Brock Secretary-Dl-rector North Carolina State Board of Elections AFFIANT Sworn to and subscribed before me this *" 6fu daY of october, 1981.