Legislature May Need to Redraw District; Legislature Authorizes New Session on Districts; Legislature Will Hold Special Session on Redistricting; Redistricting Revised News Clippings
Press
October 9, 1981 - October 11, 1981

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Williams. Legislature May Need to Redraw District; Legislature Authorizes New Session on Districts; Legislature Will Hold Special Session on Redistricting; Redistricting Revised News Clippings, 1981. 19b8a0a6-da92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/963712f3-df04-44a2-a293-79ec618d41d5/legislature-may-need-to-redraw-district-legislature-authorizes-new-session-on-districts-legislature-will-hold-special-session-on-redistricting-redistricting-revised-news-clippings. Accessed May 21, 2025.
Copied!
ay neea ByA.L.MAY Chlcl C.oltol Corr6Doodsrt N.C. Justice Department law- yers told legislative leaders firurs- day that they doubted they could successfully defend legislative redistricting plarc against a pend- ing court ehallenge, raising the likelihood that lawmakers will re- turn to Raleigh later this month to redraw district boundaries. A final decision on the additional session is expected today as the I*si:lature winds up its budget sesslon. fire redistricting plans approved by the Legislature earlier this year were challenged in a lawsuit by the NAACP Legal Defense and Edueation Fund. "14re just said we had problems (successfully defending) it,', said James F. Bullock, a senior deputy attorney- general, after meeting with key lawmakers. Bullock said his advice to Lt. Gov. James C. Green, House Speaker Liston B. Ramsey and other legislative leaders was that legislators should consider reworking the plans. Rep. Robert A. Jones, D-Ruther- ford, co+hairman of the House Legislative Redistricting Commit- tee, said, "I'd say the chances are pretty good we'll have one (redis- tricting session) some time in lggl." Membens of the House and Sen- ate redistricting committees were briefed Wednesday on the lawsuit by the Juslice Department defense team. Bullock said the legislators werc told that the sta0e successfully could defend the congressional plan, which also was redrawn dur- ing the last session of the General Assembly, but that it probably would lose on tlre legislative plans because of the U.S. Supieme Qu"t's one-man, one-vote princi ple. Jones said the special session pnobably would be later this month and that the redistricting commit- tees could start preparing new plans as early as next week. The aetion is needed soon because the filing period for the spring,s pri- mary is Jan. 4, Jones said. - The NAACP Legat Defense and Bucation Fund, Icting on behalf of four black residents] rued suit last month against the state House qna *n"!g plans and the congres- sional redistricting plan. fire suit alleges that the legisla- tive plans violate the Supreme Court's principle of "one man, one vote" and the voting rights of blacks as protected by the U.S. Constitution and the t96S Voting RightsAct. The suit's challenge to the con- gressional redistricting plan fo- cuses on alleged discrimination agains! blacks in the 2nd Congres- sional District, which hooks ti the west of Durham and Chapel HilI. The issue of one man, one iote also was raised with regard to the con_ gressional plan. . Lawgake-rs were required to ad- just political boundariei to popula- tion shifts shovm in the l*t0'cen- sus. The House and Senate plans, which.made. q1rly e few chinged from the existin! districts sel'ir l97l, allowed significant devia tions in district populations. Thq House plan contain} a differenc SecSTATE,Wc I0 Fra-fud',i([u., + Oh^i \rLL\ lD-q -8 t f\'l$lc ptr : ii4_?,:J :(:.r,. "r..t ${{id"j-d&Fi$llr,' &, :;;+;(afrB -(-pP-n Erc)l- 4.l> b'r E F 6 'Oo dr .C,-:r 4n4 o -E * 5 Etate says tedra*irg $r airtricts ;'probable -iontinucdfrom Page orc ji populations of 23.6 Percent be- toecn thc largest and smallest dis- ' lgicts. The Scnate plans contains a 22.6 percent devlatlon. "lEdrlier this year. a three-judge kderal court panel overturned Virginia's legislative Plans be- tiuie thev contained deviations of ibout 26 percent. Legislators said fhursday that the state attorneys Bid said that a total deviation of 1d.5 percent was the greatest dif- frirence allowed bv a federal court. :lSullock said [hat figure had been mentioned. But he said that ii oreoaring the state's legal de- fc'nie.'lawvers had found that. to il safe, tlie districts should devi- afe no more than l0 Percent. i .Ramsey said that if a session ivere held, it likely would be within a'month and probablY would last oily two days.jl"But *" haven't decided anY- lhing, and I can't saY anY.thing brore until I have a chance to meet bittr ttre lieutenant governor," he iaia.' Asked about the PossibilitY of a isoecial session or ieconvening of tfre General AssemblY after to- dav's expected adjournment of the buileet iession, Green said, "I've sot t-o get with the speaker and see ihat w1've got to work out." Green said the redistricting is- sue was "not under consideration by the Senate at this time-" bly would be But some legislators who Proba' v would be affected bY a changcbyblv would be attected DY a cnangc in'district lines said they were op -^.-,r +^ o cmcial session and saidoosed to a special session and said r . furey wante<i the state to fight the issue in court. "I'm opposed," said ReP. Edd Nve. D-Biiden, whose House dis- trict is to percent below the nu- merical ideal. "Bullock is not the iudee. and I don't know whY we ltro"uta no holding a session just be- cause of his oPinion that we can't win." Nve said that anyone who thinks the !ensitive topic'of redistricting could be handled in a one'or two' day session is engaging in wishful thinking. Julius Chambers, president of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund , said in an interview that his group would be concerned whether, in ariy redistricting effort, legislators would continue to follow the state Constitution's requirement that legislative districts be comprised of whole counties. ln its lawsuit, the fund has chal- lenged the state constitutional prG' vision on grounds that it inhibits the formation of single-member legislative districts that rvould be more advantageous to black can' didates. ! dt.f C: Legislature ' 'antthorizes new sess?on on'ditsti'icts .. ByA.L.MAY CttLt C.pilol Corr.3Doll{tcat At 12:{5 a.m., with the clocks in both chambers stopped just shfr of midnight because of a previoits adjournment resolution, the legis- Iators irformally decided to ?a- journ the session at g a.m. todayt The House earlier voted 6$17ito hold the redistricting session, which would be an unpiecedented third session in a year. Ttre Senate tentatively approved the measur{,31-0. \ During the session, legislator$ . will try to head off a court chal-\ |enge,to their newly {rawn_district \ 1 !i Ttrc Legislature decided Friday . to hold a special redistricting ses- sion Oct. 29, while iawmakers gave final approval tc a $3(X) mil- lion water and sewer bond referen- dum and headed toward final boundaries by the NAACP Legal l Defense and Education Fund. State Justice Department attor- leys said Thursday they would have problems defending against the suit. Ttre dispute between the House and Senate over school adminis- ,.trators' pay was the tra_St rpadblock delaying fin'al passage of tbe bud- get. The -proposed S percent salary upgrading would not take effecl for any superintendents, princi- pals or other supervisors until 1984-85. But the N.C. Assoeiation of Fducators, representing teachers, lobbied againit the raGe because teachers were not guaranteed a similar pay increase. Senatord supporting the ad- ' ministrators and House members supporting the teachers were close to an agreement, but still were haggling over the language of a compromise. Not involved in the dispute is the Sec LEGISLATURE,pqe 6 hrr-0"r*tr' --^j.Ul^ t &[oosr"tN-t l0-to-tt 1 =r p$, -f, G sage of a 8122 million tal state budget. r t-tI P+' n5 JF { cd Legislaturewill hold special session on refistricting ,..,,.*n-,u,-. l,#;!**!:5jt[:f#iiut i;l':i,'#.'*t:ff,:lll'*" *'jl"]"*"s"11f;,1T'"flHi,['": ,";]*fl*e#mY;]]i1"x i[^ili[ J""#rlll'"9il.tr't ;n._s Fretn i.f nenhe Jdl .0. EGel tlE U.s:s{prh. courl'r o{hairmu ol th. }tou. L?si.la tcuNldcohetoRal.iEnoo.i. ___""-___' r''lra* lhc plats unlcss a red'rrl r€quiRh.nL riv. Bcdi,Lricting cuomiuee. m t" "r.a;;i; i in; *li ln rhe Hd*. seral loEnbrors 'ourr ord'rrd il .rh. bod is* bilt .r.d.d th. ir-G aiJicri, * or -,er'rv "ua rtuGd ro $;-;;ioi: ' '- -'-_- in mil.pporriorud di3triirs Md Bur Hou* spe,kc' Lsron B i**,,hi.h is erp..Ld to b. h.ld .ho;n byihc rso iftc. uis v.E. Lillcy Eid, "ve *Fe Jrcsr. u. Icus on ns tou'a{ana hr slrte iii irioiina tsr poputou. ais Uld.r lhr llousr msol"on. nuchudble.' rnr{ ro cn'ns' oG pEns v'oral6 J -)) -l U .) €,_ +P I -9 _ i-r(_l_ ? I ? Ihc l,l.ws.nd obsrrycr. RalriCh. tl. 9., Sat., ocl. 10, 1981 This neut s4a4er' s oFinion I _ The legislative redistrictini olan Sdopted by the General fusErirblv deviates so widely from the one-pef- son, one-vote principle that North Carolina lawm-akerslave no choice but to revise it. In carrvins out ihli'.. hecessary task, howevei. tEe Lesii- [dture faces more than a sim[le nUmbers game. :,i t\ edistricting revisited :.The numbers, of eourse, are stark. The plan adopted in June oer- inits variation of niore than 22 ircr- cbnt between the largest and sniati- est House and SenatC districts, con- slderably more than the variations under the existing plan and more than the highest j t'6 percent - al- lowed by a eourt. In d telling blow against the plan, the state Attornev General's Office savs it cannot dei- fdnd it successfully in federal court. .'A fair system of representation being essential to a derirocracy. the U.S. Supreme Court laid down a sound test with its one-person, one- vote doctrine, requiring that each citizen's votd cairv r"oushlv the same weight in leeislative e"ledtions. Since even the stlte's own lawvers say the plan fails that test. whal al- ternativ-e does the Legislature have than to try to repa-ir the job it botched in iune? Yet, the NAACP Legal Defense and Edueation Fund's l-awsuit soei beyond challenging the wide p6pu- ra[ron varlanees approved bv the Legislature. The 'suit also "ctral- lenges the state Constitution,s Dro_ vision prohibiting the crossind of county Iines in drawing distiictsl -The Legislature's redisirictins plan retained the current rmixeil system - some districts reoresent-ed by a single member.^ others represented by two or moie rhem- bers. Some North Carolinians have one representative and one senator. others have several representativei and senators. L . . Acco-rdingly, lawmakers are con_ Ironte-q wrth a constitutional issue as well as a numbers game. Lesis- lators indeed should Eonsider ihepossib-ility of a constitutionil amendment permitting the dividineot counties. Such an-amendment] which would require approval in a statewide referehdum.' would ooen the way to the adoptioir of a sinile- member district plin, in which elch voter would be represented by one representative and one senatof. The U.S. Supreme Court has said that multi-meinber districts are not necessarily unconstitutional. But there is precedent - in Louisiana. for example - for a federal court ordering a single-member district plan into effect. In anv case. all lep- islators are elected-'from' sinelE- member districts in B0 states,"in- cluding such Southern states as AIa- panla, Tennessee, Mississippi andLouisiana. i .: . The Legal Defense Fund arsues that multi-member districts ma[e it more difficult to elect blacks to the Legislature. If lawmakers decide to t stick with the current svstem. thai - point would be tested in court. gut. aside from the qugstion of minority representation, -there are certaih aclvantages to single-member dis- tncts. Single-member districts oroduce g wld-er diversity of intere'sts in a t egrslature. Voters have clearer choices at election time, rather than |1ving to select several legislaioii fron1. -a large, amorphoui"iGki-;i i candidates.The idea of sinele-mem- , ber districts in North Carofini G not I ne-w. Such legislators as J. Allen Adams of Wake Countv and W.D.(Billy) Mills of Onslow eountv have raised the issue in the past. 5ut the G-eneral Assembly haS turned ihe idea down. Though revising the plan is im- perative., merely s-hiftinf a few lines nere and there to narrow population variances may not be enoireh to nro- duee a satisfactory map 6f Hriuse and Senate differences.' e-soeciit ses.sion of the Legislature fo re-write redistricting -would not havL Deen _necessary had lawmakers done the job well Iast sorine. But the Legislature's current dilEmma may also be an opportunity to take i rresh Iook at amending the Constitu- llrrt i3[l enacting singte-member