On Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc

2 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Includes Envelope to Ifill.

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Voting Legislation and Constitutional Amendments
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas
Case
- LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas
U.S. state
- Texas
Collection
- Case Files
Creator
Publisher
Taxonomy
Identifier
- de5f8663-257c-f011-b4cc-6045bdd81421

Cite this item

Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. On Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc, 1990. de5f8663-257c-f011-b4cc-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/96c9403f-77f5-4ac2-bedc-709f50072696/on-suggestion-for-rehearing-en-banc. Accessed November 07, 2025.

Copied!

    IN TH@EAUNITED STATES COURT OF APRg@arS U-S.CLURT OF APPEALS 
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT FILED 
  

  

  

No. 90-8014 MAR 11990 
GILBERT F. GANUCHEALU 

LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, COUNCIL NO. 4434, CLERK 
: Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

and 
JESSE OLIVER, ET AlL., Intervening Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

versus 
WILLIAM P. CLEMENTS, ETC., ET AL., Defendants, 

JIM MATTOX, ET AL., : Defendants-Appelleesappellants, 
versus 

JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ, Etc., JUDGE SHAROLYN 

WOOD, Etc., and GEORGE S. BAYOUD, JR., Etc. 

Defendants-Appellants, 
and 

TOM RICKHOFF, SUSAN D. REED, JOHN J. SPECIA,. JR., SID lL. HARLE, 

SHARON MACRAE and MICHAEL P. PEDAN, Bexar County, Texas State 

District Judges. Appellants. 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 
Western District of Texas 

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC 

  

  

( March 1, 1990 ) 

Before GEE, DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM: 

(vv) Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition 
for panel rehearing, it is ordered that the petition for panel 
rehearing is DENIED. No member of the panel nor Judge in regular 
active service of this Court having requested that the Court be 
polled on rehearing en banc (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 
and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED. 

( ) Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition 
for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. 
The judges in regular active service of this Court having been 
polled at the request of one of said judges and a majority of said 
judges not having voted in favor of it (Federal Rules of Appellate 

Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc °° 

is DENIED. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT: 

on Gill 
  

tapes States Cit J 'REHG-8 

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 
FIFTH CIRCUIT 

OFFICE OF THE CLERK 

600 CAMP STREET 

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70130 

OFFICIAL BUSINESS 

PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE $300 

Ms. Sherrilyn A. Ifill 
NAACP Legal Defense and 

Education Fund, Inc. 
99 Hudson Street 
16th Floor 
New York, NY 10013 

AT 

POSTAGE AND FEES PAID 

UNITED STATES COURTS 

usc i

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

On Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Creator

Publisher

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in