Brief in Response to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Sever or Transfer and in Support of Plaintiffs' Motions for Preliminary Injunction and Class Certification

Public Court Documents
February 13, 1986

Cite this item

Brief in Response to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Sever or Transfer and in Support of Plaintiffs' Motions for Preliminary Injunction and Class Certification preview

49 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Voting Rights
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- Dillard v. Crenshaw County
Case
- Dillard v. Crenshaw County
U.S. state
- Alabama
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 4e0e03b3-b7d8-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0

Cite this item

Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Letter from David Boyd to Judge Thompson RE: Preliminary Injunction and Addition of State of Alabama as Party-Defendants, 1986. 6baf2e36-bad8-ef11-a730-7c1e527e6da9. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/314bb7b0-63db-4797-b657-e3c59d79a557/letter-from-david-boyd-to-judge-thompson-re-preliminary-injunction-and-addition-of-state-of-alabama-as-party-defendants. Accessed May 22, 2025.

Copied!

    S. EASON BALCH 
JOHN BINGHAM 
SCHUYLER A. BAKER 
FRANK H. HAWTHORNE 
HAROLD WILLIAMS 
MAURY D. SMITH 
WILLIAM J. WARD 
ROBERT M. COLLINS 
HAROLD A. BOWRON, JR. 
CAREY J. CHITWOOD 
A. KEY FOSTER, JR. 
JOHN S. BOWMAN 
THOMAS W. THAGARD, JR. 
CHARLES M. CROOK 

JOHN RICHARD CARRIGAN 
WILLIAM E. SHANKS, JR. 
T. DWIGHT SLOAN 
S. REVELLE GWYN 
JAMES H. MILLER, 111 
RALPH F. MacDONALD, Ii} 
STEVEN G. McKINNEY 
STEVEN F. CASEY 
MALCOLM N. CARMICHAEL 
RICHARD L. PEARSON 
BRIAN D. ROE 
JAMES A. BRADFORD 
DAN H. McCRARY 
EDWARD B. PARKER, II 

STERLING G. CULPEPPER, JR. WILLIAM P. COBB, Ii 
EDWARD S. ALLEN 
WARREN H. GOODWYN 
ROBERT A. BUETTNER 
JAMES O. SPENCER, JR. 
H. HAMPTON BOLES 
C. WILLIAM GLADDEN, JR. 
MICHAEL L. EDWARDS 
MARSHALL TIMBERLAKE 
WALTER M. BEALE, JR. 
RODNEY O. MUNDY 
JAMES F. HUGHEY, JR. 

J. FOSTER CLARK 
STANLEY M. BROCK 
RANDOLPH H. LANIER 
DAVID R. BOYD 

WILLIAM S. WRIGHT 
JOHN J. COLEMAN, Iii 
PATRICK H. LUCAS 
JOHN F. MANDT 
ROBERT L. SHIELDS, Ili 
ALAN T. ROGERS 
M. STANFORD BLANTON 
ELLEN G. RAY 
KEITH B. NORMAN 
JAMES M. PROCTOR, II 

PAUL A. BRANTLEY 
PATRICIA A. MSGEE 
JONATHAN S. HARBUCK 
DAVIS G. REESE 

* 
BALCH & BINGHAM 

ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS 

POST OFFICE BOX 7B 

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101 

(205) 834-6500 

June 12, 1986 

THE WINTER BUILDING 

2 DEXTER AVENUE 
COURT SQUARE 

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36104 
TELECOPIER (205) 269-0128 

  

BIRMINGHAM OFFICES 

600 NORTH 8TH STREET 
POST OFFICE BOX 306 

BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 3520! 
205} 251-8100 

TELECOPIER (205) 252-0420 

AND 

FINANCIAL CENTER 
SUITE 700 

505 NORTH 20IH STREET 
POST OFFICE BOX 306 

BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 3520] 
(2085) 251-8100 

TELECOPIER (205) 252-1074 

  
OF COUNSEL 

D. PAUL JONES, JR. 

EDWIN W. FINCH, Hi 

HAND DELIVERED 
  

The Honorable Myron H. Thompson 
United States District Judge 
Federal Courthouse 

Montgomery, Alabama 36104 

Re: Dillard, et al. v. Crenshaw County, et al. 

Civil Action No. 85-T-1332-N 
  

Dear Judge Thompson: 

In my June 11, 1986 letter to the Court, I neglected to 
advise the Court regarding the anticipated length of the trial of 
this case on the merits. I would estimate that any evidence to 
be offered by Lawrence County would take one-half to 
three-quarters of a day, and possibly a little less. 

At a conference in this case held prior to the hearing on 
motion for preliminary injunction, I understood the Court to 
instruct Plaintiffs to add the State of Alabama, or its 
appropriate officials, as Party-Defendants in this case, since 
the Plaintiffs' evidence on their intent claims relates to 
actions of legislators and state officials, rather than actions 
of officials of the various county Defendants. I understood 
further that the Court would allow the preliminary injunction 
hearing to go forward in the absence of the appropriate state 
Defendants, but that such Defendants would be added prior to the 
trial on the merits. At this time, I am aware of no efforts by 

the Plaintiffs to add the State as Defendants, and would 
appreciate the Court clarifying its intentions in this regard. 

Respectfully yours, 

Ravn 2 

David R. Boyd 

DRB/ jam 

cc: All Counsel Of Record 

 



BALCH & BINGHAM 

ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS 

P. O. BOX 78 

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101 

Deborah Fins, Esq. 

Julius L. Chambers, 
NAACP Legal Defense 
#90608 Hudson Street 
l6th Floor 

New York, New York 

inn men

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Brief in Response to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Sever or Transfer and in Support of Plaintiffs' Motions for Preliminary Injunction and Class Certification

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in