Order Denying Motions

2 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Voting Legislation and Constitutional Amendments
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas
Case
- LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas
U.S. state
- Texas
Collection
- Case Files
Creator
Publisher
Taxonomy
Identifier
- fac27816-227c-f011-b4cc-6045bdffa665

Cite this item

Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Order Denying Motions, 1989. fac27816-227c-f011-b4cc-6045bdffa665. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/988fd8cf-ef3b-4622-8e4f-832c2485697e/order-denying-motions. Accessed November 07, 2025.

Copied!

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUN © 1989 
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION U. S. DISTR'CT CC URT 
CLES OFFI E 

LULAC, ET AL. ’ S BY eases «ss + DEPUTY 

$ 

§ 
JIM MATTOX, ET AL., & 

ORDER 
  

BEFORE THIS COURT is the State Defendants’ Motion to 

Continue in the above-captioned cause. The Motion by the State 

Defendants was filed on or about May 17, 1989. State Defendants 

supplemented their Motion on June 2, 1989. Plaintiff filed its 

opposition to the Motion to Continue on June 5, 1989. On that 

date, Dallas County District Judge Entz also filed a Motion for 

Continuance. Upon consideration of the Motions, response and 

arguments of the parties, this Court is of the opinion that such 

motion should be denied. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion of the State Defendants for 

Continuance is hereby DENIED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion of Judge Entz to 

Continue is hereby DENIED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Order Relative to Pretrial 

on the above-captioned cause is hereby amended as follows: 

1. Discovery must be complete by June 30, 1989 or as 

otherwise agreed by the parties. 

2. The Pretrial Order Rr be filed by July 7, 1989. 

SIGNED AND ENTERED this Ll day of 0 47 A 

a 
  

Jucius D. Bunton 
Chief Judge 

 



  

7:88—cv—-00154 

Sherrilyn Ifill, Esq. 
Matthews & Branscomb 

no pro hac vice 
99 Hudson St., 16th Floor 

New York, NY 10013 

SI

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Order Denying Motions

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Creator

Publisher

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in